John Edwards 'not guilty' on one count; mistrial declared on remaining charges
Source: MSNBC
Updated at 4:23 p.m. ET -- Capping a day of dramatic turnarounds, the jury in the campaign finance trial of former presidential candidate John Edwards found him not guilty on Thursday one one count and said it was deadlocked on the remaining five charges.
U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles then declared a mistrial on the remaining charges. It was not immediately clear if prosecutors intend to seek a new trial on those charges.
Read more: http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/05/31/11993007-john-edwards-not-guilty-on-one-count-mistrial-declared-on-remaining-charges
lark
(23,123 posts)HA!!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)banksters, admitted war criminals, or those illegally purging the voter rolls to suppress votes for Democrats.
RUMMYisFROSTED
(30,749 posts)rocktivity
(44,577 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Even if it took him a while.
tblue
(16,350 posts)There's no way to explain this as other than a political witch hunt, with a complicit DoJ fearing political backlash for the administration.
Grow a damed set, why don't they? Stop caving to greedy Repubs, including prosecutors with a contract out on John Edwards' future as an effective Democratic voice.
I am not one to jump on any bandwagon and I believe it is bad karma to kick a man when he's down.
cal04
(41,505 posts)Updated at 4:23 p.m. ET -- Capping a day of dramatic turnarounds, the jury in the campaign finance trial of former presidential candidate John Edwards found him not guilty on Thursday one one count and said it was deadlocked on the remaining five charges.
U.S. District Judge Catherine Eagles then declared a mistrial on the remaining charges. It was not immediately clear if prosecutors intend to seek a new trial on those charges.
Earlier, the jury of eight men and four women told Eagles that it had reached a verdict on all six felony accounts against Edwards. But after the jury returned to the courtroom, the foreperson stated that jurors had reached a unanimous decision on only one count. Eagles then sent them back to the jury room to resume deliberations.
https://twitter.com/NBCNews
Judge has ruled a mistrial on the 5 remaining counts.
Expand
NOT GUILTY on Count 3 (accepted/received illegal campaign contributions) and unable to decide on other counts.
Edwards acquitted on one count; mistrial on others
http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/05/24/2102221/edwards-jury-has-recahed-verdict.html
progressoid
(49,992 posts)I'm sure the RWers will use this as an example of how "Demoncrats" always get away with it.
spooky3
(34,461 posts)and ask them what they think of Citizens United and the $400 mill. contribution that the Koch bros. are making to GOP campaigns this year.
Life Long Dem
(8,582 posts)Not really but...
24601
(3,962 posts)federal gift tax, it wasn't a political donation. If they didn't declare it and pay, it wasn't meant as a personal gift.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)DianaForRussFeingold
(2,552 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)peace frog
(5,609 posts)Best wishes to the entire family, and I was happy to hear him lovingly include the love child among the fold.
Scairp
(2,749 posts)This was a shit case and I don't see a retrial. Glad it's over.
Tobin S.
(10,418 posts)It seems like the press had already found him guilty and sent him up the river. I wonder if they'll try to prosecute him again?
underpants
(182,843 posts)and he not only knew who to hire (and had the money to do it) but he was probably extremely important to building the case.
I went and saw him speech here in Richmond in 2004. I was maybe 15 feet from him. His message was what Occupy pushed as well. It is so sad to see Elizabeth having to go through this and how sad Edwards became. He slept with the mistress the first night so I doubt this was anything new to him. He was on the prowl probably.
SomeGuyInEagan
(1,515 posts)No doubt he was involved in building the case.
ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)"I think we should just classify John Edwards as "about as guilty as Newt Gingrich." Just for reference."
freshwest
(53,661 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)but the longer it took, the more I thought this would be the result
hatrack
(59,587 posts)Can't wait to see what the Flaring Nostrils of Justice will make of this outcome!
peace frog
(5,609 posts)as it is, I avoid her like the plague.
pscot
(21,024 posts)BlueStater
(7,596 posts)Meanwhile, mass murderers are allowed to walk around as free men and don't have to spend a day in court. What a great country.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)All this for consensual sex and a batty, very elderly woman who adored Edwards.
Since 2008, the Supreme Court has pretty much established an anything goes rule for campaign funding. All you have to do is register a corporation, and you can pay for all the whoopee you want. The entire charge, the whole trial -- a terrible waste of taxpayer money. An anachronism.
Of course, Holder will go back, permit the prosecutor to retry the case just to completely destroy Edwards and his family and discourage any other "leftist" (ridiculous) from challenging Obama or the corporate centrists ever again.
Meanwhile, back on planet earth, the temperature at the North Pole is dangerously high. But who cares? Edwards was unfaithful to his dying wife. And that is a crime that must be punished.
Oh, and, on edit, I forgot to mention that Gingrich, who also cheated on a wife who was suffering from cancer and who accepted much more financial support for his failed campaign from an addled casino owner is walking around free, mouthing off crazy ideas like a rooster in a barnyard.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)I was behind Edwards til he quit. Say what you will about him - NO ONE ELSE - ever even mentioned the plight of the poor. It's akin to the faithful ignoring the ultimatums for transgressions spelled out in the bible. Just ignore that which doesn't fit your fancy and it conveniently doesn't exist.
Edit: for typo
rurallib
(62,431 posts)Edwards was the only one ready to take on the corporatists. My feeling is that that was his real sin.
And while our court and media time is wasted on this, corporations rape us right and left. Jobs sent overseas, 1/4 of our children in poverty, 50,000 dying annually of lack of health care, not one bankster in jail for the biggest theft ever from the American people.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)But I've had a sneaking notion that maybe Hunters pursuit of Edwards was not all that primal. There may well be hidden payoffs for her seducing him. MAybe not, but I've never heard anyone else speculate on it. It should at least be thought about. Of course, his taking the bait is what makes it bad - put him in the same league as McCain leaving his ill wife.
To me - SOMETHING was fishy after his second place win in Iowa - when the networks seemed to go OUT OF THEIR WAY not to acknowledge it.
rurallib
(62,431 posts)they have 2 things in common:
1) They had the knowledge and ability to go after the boys on Wall Street (and were open about it)
2) they had a weakness that could be easily exploited.
edcantor
(325 posts)Bush, never even charged after all the people he willfully murdered and all the international laws he broke.
Makes sense only in a Republican world.
contrarian22
(16 posts)He approved it.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)The Wizard
(12,545 posts)in tune with Republican ideals, like start a war for profit. It may be the most immoral act, but there's no sex between consenting adults. Now if there was a stained blue dress and Ken Starr.......
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)That'll teach ya!!
Yeah, baby!!
Wabbajack_
(1,300 posts)F..ing gop smear job FAIL.