Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 09:45 AM Feb 2016

Britain gives scientist go-ahead to genetically modify human embryos

Source: Reuters

Scientists in Britain have been give the go-ahead to edit the genes of human embryos for research, using a technique that some say could eventually be used to create "designer babies".

Less than a year after Chinese scientists caused an international furor by saying they had genetically modified human embryos, Kathy Niakan, a stem cell scientist from London's Francis Crick Institute, was granted a license to carry out similar experiments.

"The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has approved a research application from the Francis Crick Institute to use new 'gene editing' techniques on human embryos," Niakan's lab said on Monday.

It said the work carried out "will be for research purposes and will look at the first seven days of a fertilized egg's development, from a single cell to around 250 cells".

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/health-genes-editing-idUSL8N15G1SU

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Britain gives scientist go-ahead to genetically modify human embryos (Original Post) IDemo Feb 2016 OP
What could go wrong... nt branford Feb 2016 #1
Maybe this? alcina Feb 2016 #3
No doubt, 400,000 years ago some slow-witted lower Paleolithic man once asked the same LanternWaste Feb 2016 #7
If you watch the news or studied history, branford Feb 2016 #8
Everything we do has a downside The2ndWheel Feb 2016 #10
As American science slides farther and farther behind the rest of the world's. DrBulldog Feb 2016 #2
What could possibly go wrong? NV Whino Feb 2016 #4
These embryos will not get beyond seven days old TexasMommaWithAHat Feb 2016 #5
The alien/human hybrid experiments must go on! Baclava Feb 2016 #6
Yum! n/t PasadenaTrudy Feb 2016 #9
Very cool. nt ZombieHorde Feb 2016 #11
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
7. No doubt, 400,000 years ago some slow-witted lower Paleolithic man once asked the same
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 12:33 PM
Feb 2016

No doubt, 400,000 years ago some slow-witted lower Paleolithic man once asked the same when confronted with the controlled use of fire by human. Though I doubt he was clever enough to append his query with "nt."

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
8. If you watch the news or studied history,
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 12:41 PM
Feb 2016

you could certainly advance the argument that it might have been best if man never played with fire.

Nevertheless, I was being a little facetious in my prior post.

The risks of experimentation with human embryos still do have significant ethical, moral, legal, social, and practical problems that need to be addressed. If that wasn't the case, the article would not have been particularly newsworthy.

The2ndWheel

(7,947 posts)
10. Everything we do has a downside
Mon Feb 1, 2016, 01:32 PM
Feb 2016

It all has an upside as well, but the downside is there. That downside doesn't stop us from doing what we want to do, but it's there. If we live on a finite planet, everything is give and take.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Britain gives scientist g...