Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hoosierlib

(710 posts)
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 06:54 PM Feb 2016

Indicted Anti-Abortion Activist Offered Probation in Case

Source: ABC News

One of the two anti-abortion activists indicted last month after making undercover videos about Planned Parenthood has been offered probation to settle the charge, prosecutors announced Wednesday.

The possible resolution was made public following Sandra Merritt's initial court appearance after she turned herself in to Texas authorities and posted a $2,000 bond, which had been reduced from $10,000.

The other activist, David Daleiden, was scheduled to turn himself in Thursday. Both are charged with tampering with a governmental record, a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison. Daleiden also was indicted on a misdemeanor count related to purchasing human organs that carries up to a year in prison. The two activists plan to plead not guilty.

Harris County prosecutor Britni Cooper said Wednesday that Merritt has been offered pretrial diversion, which is a form of probation typically offered to nonviolent first-time offenders. If Merritt maintains a clean record while on probation then the charge could be dismissed, Cooper said.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/anti-abortion-activist-indicted-texas-turns-36691242



Such bull shit...if they minority and not conservative activists, they would have had the book thrown at them...
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Indicted Anti-Abortion Activist Offered Probation in Case (Original Post) hoosierlib Feb 2016 OP
Maybe someone cut a deal... Ellipsis Feb 2016 #1
According to Daleiden's Wiki page, he registered his front group as a 501(c)(3) jmowreader Feb 2016 #2
Could part of a plea deal be disclosure of all donors to their fake charity? csziggy Feb 2016 #5
Filing requirements homegirl Feb 2016 #7
Oh - I didn't realize that. Thanks! nt csziggy Feb 2016 #8
Thee is no "federal case" here. former9thward Feb 2016 #9
I know what they were charged with... jmowreader Feb 2016 #13
Daleiden must go to jail. Dawson Leery Feb 2016 #12
IRS Law Allows Groups cynzke Feb 2016 #14
I agree with this. deathrind Feb 2016 #3
Yes, they should go to jail William Seger Feb 2016 #4
+1000 smirkymonkey Feb 2016 #10
Fair enough. I see your point. deathrind Feb 2016 #11
As much as I agree Lazy Daisy Feb 2016 #6

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
2. According to Daleiden's Wiki page, he registered his front group as a 501(c)(3)
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:11 PM
Feb 2016

Since he wasn't actually running a charity, there have GOT to be laws against doing this. If Merritt will roll over on Daleiden and help them build a federal case against him, I'd be happy with giving her pretrial diversion.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
5. Could part of a plea deal be disclosure of all donors to their fake charity?
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:53 PM
Feb 2016

I would very much like to know who is financing these people so they can make their lying videos to damage organizations that exist to help people.

As long as the people who make the video have to admit to their guilt (so it will be forever linked to their names) and name who helped them do it, I could live with a plea deal.

homegirl

(1,428 posts)
7. Filing requirements
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 08:07 PM
Feb 2016

501 (c) (3) organizations are required to file with the Sec. of State of the state of formation. These filings are available from the Sec.of State upon written request from any citizen. Filings are sometimes available through the Registrar of Voters in your county. Sources of imcome are clearly shown on these filings.

former9thward

(31,981 posts)
9. Thee is no "federal case" here.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 08:15 PM
Feb 2016

They both were charged with creating a fake driver's license. This is something hundreds of thousands of college students use every night to buy beer and get into bars. They don't go to jail and these people will not either.

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
13. I know what they were charged with...
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 10:10 PM
Feb 2016

Problem is, what he was charged with doesn't completely cover everything he did - not even close. He set up fake charities, established a fake company, made illegal videotapes and attempted to destroy Planned Parenthood. Charging him with "fake ID" is like letting a bank robber plea bargain down to illegal parking in front of the bank.

cynzke

(1,254 posts)
14. IRS Law Allows Groups
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 11:32 PM
Feb 2016

to file as 501(c) 3's or 4's on their own in advance of IRS approval. This is "self-declaring". Its not illegal and you may begin your activities, but if you can not meet the proper criteria, then you lose "tax-exempt" status . You have to change your "self-declared" status to a political group, list your donors and pay taxes.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
3. I agree with this.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:16 PM
Feb 2016

I don't think either should be put in jail but I do feel there should be a very substantial fine for their actions.

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
4. Yes, they should go to jail
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:39 PM
Feb 2016

The direct result of this video was the loss of millions of dollars that would be going to health care for women; it shouldn't be treated like a prank. Obviously, the prosecutors didn't consider how much real damage had been done.

deathrind

(1,786 posts)
11. Fair enough. I see your point.
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 08:42 PM
Feb 2016

My thinking was instead of the taxpayer paying for them to have room and board they should have to pay a very substantial fine and do several thousands of hours community service...perhaps at a Planned Parenthood facility so they could see what PP actually does and realize the enormous help PP provides to both women and men.

But I see your point and it is very valid as well.

 

Lazy Daisy

(928 posts)
6. As much as I agree
Wed Feb 3, 2016, 07:58 PM
Feb 2016

with not locking everybody up for non-violent crimes, this isn't a victim less crime. This was done with malice.
I'm having a hard time being as forgiving.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Indicted Anti-Abortion Ac...