Luxembourg plans to pioneer asteroid mining
Source: ABC News (Australia)
Luxembourg plans to pioneer asteroid mining
Updated about 4 hours ago
As Earth cooled during the early phase of its formation, most heavy substances including valuable ones like gold sank toward its core, making them inaccessible.
As a result, mineral extraction is now beginning to explore a new frontier: space.
Luxembourg has announced plans to pioneer the potentially lucrative business of mining asteroids in space for gold, platinum and tungsten.
The Government said it planned to create a legal framework for exploiting resources beyond Earth's atmosphere, and said it welcomed private investors and other nations.
Read more: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-04/space-mining-plans-unveiled-by-luxembourg/7138380
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Luxembourg?
Maybe they plan to become the Cayman Islands for SpaceX style companies.
How are we supposed to take this seriously?
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)I have not had anyone to talk about the space elevators since forever, My friends read either romance or investment books. I am the only scifi reader in my personal life since I got divorced, it was the one thing I actually shared with my ex.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I grew up with Clarke, but for the Golden Agers, I tend to lean towards Heinlein, Silverberg and Herbert. I actually saw Frank Herbert speak at University of North Texas back in the early '90s.
I've been reading some super stuff lately, but not near as many stories as I used to read. There is so much coming out these days as a result of epublishing. So much crap, but also many more superb novels.
Have you checked out Ready Player One or anything by John Scalzi?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)It's a fricken' amazing story.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)daleo
(21,317 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)We could build a space elevator and there's a tricky construction-method where we wouldn't even need super-strong materials. All we had to do would be to lower 1000 tons of steel-cable from a space-station in orbit while that space station continuously climbs into higher orbits to keep the center-of-mass at the right height.
Luxembourg has the wrong latitude for rocket-launches into orbit.
Yeah, tax-haven for space-companies is the only possible way.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)And send giant air-filled balls of gold and platinum to the earth at 60MPH, nowhere near dense enough to achieve a large velocity.
They could plop down in the middle of an otherwise vacant area, be collected and then melted down.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)It sounds intriguing. Do you know if there is a term for it or a link describing it in more detail?
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)The video is here:
&t=27m55sA brief discussion is here:
http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/53949/does-the-metal-foam-whiffleball-orbital-reentry-idea-make-any-sense
My only question is the softness of these metals. The space in between would presumably be a vacuum. Wouldn't it implode when it got to a high enough pressure? And what would happen then?
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,339 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)this is turning into my reading list when is someone going to mention Vonnegut?
Baclava
(12,047 posts)Go to Ceres and set up a base there. Nothing comes back to earth, all the raw materials to be used to build mining colonies is out there. 1000 miles in diameter, Ceres has more water than all the Earth's oceans. This frozen fresh water can also be made into hydrogen/oxygen fuel.
A base at Cere's position would make it a good gas station for trips throughout the solar system. With only 3% of Earth's gravity, it won't take much to escape Ceres after refueling.
Genetically modified human colonists with increased radiation resistance and enhanced for low gravity environments would be best. They will not be returning to earth either.
Robots would do most of the work.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)- Energy: The asteroid-belt is too far out for solar-power. Thermoelectric batteries need radioactive material, really strong stuff. Fusion-reactors will come in 50-100 years.
- Leakage of air and water simply by going in and out of hatches... You would need a whole biosphere just to stay barely alive. And we still have problems creating artificial biospheres with stable climate and plant-life.
- Trips: You would still need some kind of fuel for actio=reactio-propulsion-engines. And Sol is one hell of a strong gravity-well. Except with a fly-by, small spacecraft will have a hard time leaving the inner zone of the solar system.
- Humans cannot survive in space for more than a few years, because of medical problems. We have no idea how human embryos grow in zero-gravity. Mice-embryos exhibit serious deformations.
- Well, there is a gene for increased resistance to radiation. It was developed by a fungus growing in the Chernobyl reactor...
Baclava
(12,047 posts)Hollowed out smaller asteroids could be used for habitats as well as spacecraft.
100 years ago people laughed at airplanes as cloth and piano wire contraptions that would never amount to much.
100 years from now people will look back and laugh at our supposed superiority in science knowledge.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)where a vacuum is pulled against them. It wouldn't 100% eliminate the losses, but it would cut them down to nearly nothing. It would take quite a bit of energy and time every time someone wanted to go out or come in, though.
The second to last point you made is going to be the killer. Reduced gravity is super unhealthy. It's going to be hard to be a miner when your bones are getting weaker and your heart is getting smaller.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Get the smaller asteroids to rotate?
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)Been watching too much of the latest SyFy series
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)So many of our social and political problems have been hashed out in SF novels for decades. They're the roadmaps to what we become.
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.