Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,624 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:52 PM Feb 2016

Scalia's Death Prompts Dow to Settle Suits for $835 Million

Source: Bloomberg

Dow Chemical Co. said it agreed to pay $835 million to settle an antitrust case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court after Justice Antonin Scalia’s death reduced its chances of overturning a jury award.

Dow, the largest U.S. chemical maker by sales, said Friday the accord will resolve its challenges to a $1.06 billion award to purchasers of compounds for urethanes, chemicals used to make foam upholstery for furniture and plastic walls in refrigerators.

The Midland, Michigan-based company disputed a jury’s finding it had conspired with four other chemical makers to fix urethane prices and asked the Supreme Court to take the class-action case on appeal. Scalia, one of the court’s most conservative members, had voted to scale back the reach of such group suits.

“Growing political uncertainties due to recent events with the Supreme Court and increased likelihood for unfavorable outcomes for business involved in class-action suits have changed Dow’s risk assessment of the situation,” the company said in an e-mailed statement.


Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-02-26/dow-cites-scalia-s-death-in-settling-urethanes-case-for-835m



IOW - "It's a pain not having a friendly vote already in our corner"
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scalia's Death Prompts Dow to Settle Suits for $835 Million (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2016 OP
Corporations, gun nuts, and haters of women have no clue how this changes everything. nt onehandle Feb 2016 #1
I fervently hope they are about to find out. Raster Feb 2016 #8
K&R ffr Feb 2016 #21
I wish the people threatening not to vote leftynyc Feb 2016 #18
I hope that people realized that we need to nominate the most electable candidate Bernie Sanders.n/t Loudestlib Feb 2016 #29
I'll be voting in leftynyc Feb 2016 #32
I can't help chuckling that your hyperactive autocorrect found "emir" to be a more tblue37 Feb 2016 #34
I hate autocorrect leftynyc Feb 2016 #38
That it does! nt tblue37 Feb 2016 #39
As a Second Amendment supporter TeddyR Feb 2016 #30
Here's an article with a couple of good updates. Another good source of scotus okaawhatever Feb 2016 #33
How nice - sensible input from a "gun nut." :) Hortensis Feb 2016 #35
It's nice to know he didn't die in vain n/t sharp_stick Feb 2016 #2
DUzy! Raster Feb 2016 #5
Too soon? awoke_in_2003 Feb 2016 #11
Perfect! mountain grammy Feb 2016 #16
Nicely done! NurseJackie Feb 2016 #24
All hail Mr Justice Scalia... malthaussen Feb 2016 #3
Hear - Hear!!!! ffr Feb 2016 #20
fking pond scum saturnsring Feb 2016 #4
Obama should start nominating real Liberal people so it can stay 4-4. It appears LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #6
Absolutely. Right-wingers don't realize the disadvantage of a 4/4 court. mainer Feb 2016 #7
One can only hope. Dow just up and settling for that amount would scare me. LiberalArkie Feb 2016 #13
Probably just chicken feed to them. malthaussen Feb 2016 #22
ITS SCARY! cynzke Feb 2016 #28
What's especially scary about that, tho? The lower decisions, Hortensis Feb 2016 #36
I hope all the candidates are asked what they think about this. floppyboo Feb 2016 #9
Scalia's absence could affect a number of cases Gothmog Feb 2016 #10
Even more reason Lazy Daisy Feb 2016 #12
I'm sorry to his family & friends for their loss. However, Sunlei Feb 2016 #14
Best decision Scalia ever made was to die.. mountain grammy Feb 2016 #15
Maybe this makes it difficult for the SCOTUS to select the next prez. /nt NCjack Feb 2016 #17
There you go bringing up history again... FailureToCommunicate Feb 2016 #25
5 - 4 Progressive. Can there be no better excuse to vote this November? ffr Feb 2016 #19
"increased likelihood for unfavorable outcomes for business" Marie Marie Feb 2016 #23
Yes, businesses that steal and fix prices that is. cutroot Feb 2016 #27
I wonder just how McConnel is going to deal with all the 4-4 decisions or 5-3 where the Pubs lose in napi21 Feb 2016 #26
Big smile here dmr Feb 2016 #31
Awww...poor Wall Street they lost their biggest tool! Rex Feb 2016 #37
What made Scalia TeddyR Feb 2016 #40
Awww did I hurt your feelings? Rex Feb 2016 #41

Raster

(20,998 posts)
8. I fervently hope they are about to find out.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:08 PM
Feb 2016

1. Strengthen Roe v. Wade and affirm the rights of reproductive freedom;
2. Equal pay for equal work, across the board;
3. One person, one vote. Period;
4. People are persons: living, breathing persons. Corporations are business entities, neither person, nor immortal;
5. The right for two persons to commit and establish a family unit, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, religion, race, creed or color; and
6. Freedom of religion. Freedom FROM religion.

My wish list. Just a start...

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
32. I'll be voting in
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:17 PM
Feb 2016

The general for whoever has the D by emir name. I would hope everyone who cares about civil rights, women's rights, voting rights, gay rights and the environment would do the same.

tblue37

(65,442 posts)
34. I can't help chuckling that your hyperactive autocorrect found "emir" to be a more
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 02:47 PM
Feb 2016

likely option than "their" in your sentence! Apparently autocorrect prefers anything a bit unusual.

WHen I tried to post something about Oliver Sacks' death once, autocorrect turned it into "all of her socks."

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
38. I hate autocorrect
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 06:32 PM
Feb 2016

It always seems to take a simple typo that anyone could figure out and makes it something crazy.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
30. As a Second Amendment supporter
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:14 PM
Feb 2016

Or apparently a "gun nut," I doubt this changes anything with respect to the right to keep and bear arms. Let's assume that the Supreme Court decides to reverse Heller (most people who actually pay attention to Supreme Court rulings believe this is unlikely), what do you think that changes? Many, if not most, state constitutions protect the right to keep and bear arms, and Congress isn't going to do anything meaningful on firearms in the foreseeable future. Heller could go away right now and I'd still have the right to keep and bear arms here in Virginia.

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
33. Here's an article with a couple of good updates. Another good source of scotus
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:32 PM
Feb 2016

info written in a way non-lawyers can understand is scotusblog.com Here is an article on 2A


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/major-second-amendment-case_us_56659b12e4b079b2818f2118

http://www.scotusblog.com/2015/06/new-doubts-on-second-amendment-rights/

Their is a Guns-RKBA Group here at DU. If you go to the bottom of the page and click on Forums/Groups, then subject: Justice & Public Safety you can see the home page for it. Welcome to DU

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
35. How nice - sensible input from a "gun nut." :)
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:55 PM
Feb 2016

I think so too. What is it, one in every four households in America has a gun or guns?



LiberalArkie

(15,720 posts)
6. Obama should start nominating real Liberal people so it can stay 4-4. It appears
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:05 PM
Feb 2016

that a lot of big people can't get what they want now.

mainer

(12,022 posts)
7. Absolutely. Right-wingers don't realize the disadvantage of a 4/4 court.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:07 PM
Feb 2016

They could lose a lot of big cases while they refuse to consider a replacement.

malthaussen

(17,205 posts)
22. Probably just chicken feed to them.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:11 PM
Feb 2016

But more chicken feed than it would have cost them in other circumstances.

-- Mal

cynzke

(1,254 posts)
28. ITS SCARY!
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 05:49 PM
Feb 2016

No longer a sure thing. Even with Scalia, the court favored on the side of ACA twice and gay marriage. A tie is not guarantee there will be a tie in every case. IF ANYTHING, there will be more incentive on both sides to reach a consensus on cases and settle them OR merely send them back to the lower court decision.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
36. What's especially scary about that, tho? The lower decisions,
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:57 PM
Feb 2016

even when bad, only apply to their districts, and only until they're taken up again.


floppyboo

(2,461 posts)
9. I hope all the candidates are asked what they think about this.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:11 PM
Feb 2016

It would certainly be a good litmus test. Not only on the SCOTUS issue, but on class action. Especially interested in Hillary's reaction. Trump we can pretty much guess.

 

Lazy Daisy

(928 posts)
12. Even more reason
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:20 PM
Feb 2016

Bernie must be the nominee and not Hillary. Hillary will, IF elected, nominate corporate friendly justices and then it's back to the same ol' same ol'. She's already dog whistled to the right she's open to restrictions to Roe v Wade.

But no, President Obama should not wait, he should move ahead and we push like hell for Congress to act.

FailureToCommunicate

(14,014 posts)
25. There you go bringing up history again...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:57 PM
Feb 2016

I believe Justice Rehnquist was also pretty important in Bush v Gore, but the memory is getting fuzzy... and Antonin Scalia told us all to “Come on, get over it!”

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15tues4.html?_r=0

ffr

(22,671 posts)
19. 5 - 4 Progressive. Can there be no better excuse to vote this November?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:06 PM
Feb 2016

My fellow democrats, stay energized, get others energized and excited about voting for our progressive/liberal candidates all the way up to and including election day. We can sweep the Rethugs out and silence their voices. Just keep doing what you're doing.

Marie Marie

(9,999 posts)
23. "increased likelihood for unfavorable outcomes for business"
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:50 PM
Feb 2016

will mean favorable outcomes for we the people. 'Bout damn time!

napi21

(45,806 posts)
26. I wonder just how McConnel is going to deal with all the 4-4 decisions or 5-3 where the Pubs lose in
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 05:08 PM
Feb 2016

SCOTUS? Many of the cases before the court NOW are going to resort to the lower case decision because of 4-4 decisions. Cases that the Pubs were really excited to win, but now will; not. This is going to go on for more than a year before the new Prez gets to nominate someone, snd then there's the real possibility of the new Prez being a Dem! HAH! I love seeing them crying in there beer!

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
40. What made Scalia
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 07:55 PM
Feb 2016

Wall Street's "biggest tool"? Lot's of hyperbole and accusations but no facts.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
41. Awww did I hurt your feelings?
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 08:08 PM
Feb 2016

You worshiped the guy right? No doubt you loved his Citizens United ruling etc.. Now go play with the other kids, I'm sure someone will waste time on you if you try hard.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scalia's Death Prompts Do...