Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:23 PM Apr 2016

Why tens of thousands of America’s poorest people just lost their food stamps

Source: WP

As many as 1 million Americans will stop receiving food stamps over the course of this year beginning on Friday, the consequence of a controversial work mandate that has been reinstated in 22 states as the economy improves.

The 20-year-old rule — which was suspended in many states during the economic recession — requires that adults without children or disabilities must have a job in order to receive food stamps through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for more than three months, with some exceptions. Many states have begun to reimpose the federal rule as the economy recovers, with the largest group reviving it at the beginning of this year. As a result, many recipients' three-month limit expires today, April 1.

The change has reignited a fierce debate between conservative leaders, who say waiving the mandate discourages people from working, and their liberal counterparts, who say the three-month time limit ignores the reality that jobs are still hard to come by for low-skilled workers.

Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who helped author the work requirement as a U.S. congressman in 1996, is among the conservative politicians arguing that able-bodied adults should not receive SNAP benefits if they are not working. At the end of 2013, Kasich decided not to request an extension of the statewide waiver of the work mandate, enforcing the rule in all but its most economically depressed, rural counties.

A spokesman for Kasich, a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, said reinstating the requirement would prod people to seek work in the improving economy.

“These are, again, adults — no dependents, physically and mentally capable of working,” said Rob Nichols, a spokesman for Kasich’s presidential campaign, in a recent interview. “Just as much as we believe in the social safety net, we also believe it’s a sin not to help oneself.”

Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/why-tens-of-thousands-of-america%E2%80%99s-poorest-people-just-lost-their-food-stamps/ar-BBreajV?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=iehp

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why tens of thousands of America’s poorest people just lost their food stamps (Original Post) Lodestar Apr 2016 OP
1996, hmmmm Uponthegears Apr 2016 #1
Who was that guy. RATM435 Apr 2016 #3
1996. Good question. Who in the world agreed to such a horrible rule? And was he married? JDPriestly Apr 2016 #4
Expanded Medicaid could care for persons having no job. Doctors can determine if a person DhhD Apr 2016 #10
Great for people who have physical disabilities. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #13
You just described the people who are often most vulnerable jwirr Apr 2016 #25
Right. I have wondered whether some of them might qualify as severely autistic. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #27
When I wrote that I was thinking about one of my best friends. jwirr Apr 2016 #33
As a parent of autistic adults... Blanks Apr 2016 #35
I agree although I don't know as much as you do about autism. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #43
Exactly. jwirr Apr 2016 #44
Dinocrats are social darwinists Scootaloo Apr 2016 #41
+1 jwirr Apr 2016 #46
"Clintons?" I thought Hillary was FLOTUS then? Jitter65 Apr 2016 #20
Hillary served only four years as Secretary of State and eight years at most in Congress. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #21
She claims being first lady among her credentials Scootaloo Apr 2016 #42
yes,and this country has a lot of these types. wendylaroux Apr 2016 #32
Hmmmm 20 years.... Lemme do the math... mpcamb Apr 2016 #47
Starving the very poor, the very ones who most need it. 99th_Monkey Apr 2016 #2
You are correct those without children or dependents are the jwirr Apr 2016 #24
while they scream about being "Christians" LiberalElite Apr 2016 #26
Clinton welfare 'reform' strikes again Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #5
Exactly. jwirr Apr 2016 #23
and all that time he was in office LiberalElite Apr 2016 #30
You and your friend are not by any means the only ones jwirr Apr 2016 #34
I know - we were just 2 LiberalElite Apr 2016 #36
Sorry about your friend. jwirr Apr 2016 #37
Thank you. nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #39
It's disgusting that Kasich sets up one set of rules for urban voters and another set off rules StevieM Apr 2016 #6
what is disgusting is bill clinton signed this into law, with hillary cheering all the way questionseverything Apr 2016 #53
This is something which should be a big convo starter for Bernie pinebox Apr 2016 #7
Kasich's good ol' boy down home personality deceives some people I think. Tobin S. Apr 2016 #8
And a little more polite than Trump eats his pizza with a fork and knive. classykaren Apr 2016 #16
Who gets the money from Food Stamps? The poor don't Downwinder Apr 2016 #9
Must agree. They can surly calculate their loss of business. DhhD Apr 2016 #11
Why . . . some guy Apr 2016 #12
"...a sin..." SHRED Apr 2016 #14
Hmm maindawg Apr 2016 #15
Do they report their income to the IRS? TexasBushwhacker Apr 2016 #18
I gotta say that I'm way more concerned LiberalElite Apr 2016 #38
I am as well TexasBushwhacker Apr 2016 #40
That is true - no reporting = no record = no benefits LiberalElite Apr 2016 #45
I think many don't think ahead TexasBushwhacker Apr 2016 #49
Scum.... daleanime Apr 2016 #17
Any Republicans? SansACause Apr 2016 #19
Where in the Bible is the fib about "it's a sin not to help jwirr Apr 2016 #22
It's in the Bootstrap Bible. dchill Apr 2016 #28
Exactly. jwirr Apr 2016 #29
Who claimed it was in the bible? n/t 24601 Apr 2016 #48
The last paragraph of the OP talks about sin. And anyone jwirr Apr 2016 #52
Kasich isn't Calvinist. He's Episcopal/Anglican - and one of our faith who came over from the Roman 24601 Apr 2016 #55
You must know that the faith based ideas are so intertwined jwirr Apr 2016 #56
Compounded by the usual suspect states who don't use federal money to help their most vulnerable BeyondGeography Apr 2016 #31
The bears will go back into the forest... sofa king Apr 2016 #50
These people are human beings, for christ's sake. The people who would harm them should be punished, Judi Lynn Apr 2016 #51
Jobs picking up rich folks' dogs' crap Blandocyte Apr 2016 #54
Why is this the only kind of thing Repugs can get accomplished legislatively? Bozvotros Apr 2016 #57
And we have the Clintons to thank liberalhistorian Apr 2016 #58
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
1. 1996, hmmmm
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:34 PM
Apr 2016

I think I remember the president at that time proudly holding out that welfare reform bill as one of the major accomplishments of his presidency.

Who was that guy anyway?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
4. 1996. Good question. Who in the world agreed to such a horrible rule? And was he married?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 03:47 PM
Apr 2016

Who was his wife? What was her name now? What ever happened to her?

We have a friend whose son is justpeople what you would call "eccentric." He is kind of a hermit. He has a house left to him by his family, and his sister makes sure his property taxes are paid, but he does not work and would never be hired by anyone because he is just eccentric.

He relies on food stamps because he doesn't have an income.

There are many people like him with various conditions that psychologists can name but most of us would just describe as "strange" or misfits. This law means that only those who are employable get to eat. But who decides who gets a job?

The system assumes that because we are equal in the eyes of God, we can all function at the same capacity. That is false. Most people want to work. Not all are employable.

This bill and Kasich are completely lacking in humanity and compassion. It isn't really about the money. It is simply about getting a sadistic pleasure from the suffering of people who are "different."

Kasich should be called out for this.

And he should be reminded of the saying, "There but for the grace of God go I."

Some of us have been so blessed and are so lucky. Why should we be so stingy with those who have not had our good fortune?

Kasich is one of the stingy. And the Clintons? Was deforming welfare really such an achievement? Not for me.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
10. Expanded Medicaid could care for persons having no job. Doctors can determine if a person
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:05 PM
Apr 2016

Doctors can determine if a person is unable to work or unable to do substantial work due to mild, moderate, or severe disability, physical, mental or both.

The state workforce commission can also do aptitude testing, with family members present to take notes. Can the workforce place the person in appropriate work and work environment; that includes transportation?

Anyone can apply for Social Security Disability Benefits. It provides for a free physical. Medicare takes up to 5 months for a decision; so apply for Medicare at the same time. Below is an online application.

https://www.ssa.gov/disabilityssi/apply.html

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
13. Great for people who have physical disabilities.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:11 PM
Apr 2016

But I worked on a homeless project for years.

There simply are a lot of people who might have worked as farm hands in days of yore, but who are social misfits and simply cannot work in a modern workplace.

They are often reclusive, quiet people you would not notice.

They would not qualify for Social Security Disability Benefits.

Lack of compassion in our society. And Medicaid helps with health needs but does not feed people as far as I know. Do you have a link showing that it does?

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
25. You just described the people who are often most vulnerable
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:36 PM
Apr 2016

We all know them - they are the ones no one WILL hire. They are the ones no one WANTS around.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
27. Right. I have wondered whether some of them might qualify as severely autistic.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:41 PM
Apr 2016

Autism was not recognized when I was growing up. I think my friend's son may be autistic. He is very kind and quiet and sweet really. My husband gets along with him well. If you see him, you think he is a hippy but he isn't. He is just who he is. And probably unemployable.

A lack of compassion is a very sad thing. It is a way of expressing ingratitude for one's own good fortune.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
33. When I wrote that I was thinking about one of my best friends.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:50 PM
Apr 2016

She was an over weight child who did not have many friends because she was so different and then she married a man just like her. Neither of them were hired regardless of all the applications they put in. And this was in a small town where compassion would have not hurt anyone.

And I had not thought of it as autism then but now that you say this it may very well have been the case for both of them. They just never fit in.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
35. As a parent of autistic adults...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:58 PM
Apr 2016

I think a lot of autistic people can be taught to work and hold down a job, but the training and constant intervention to help autistic persons get and keep a job would probably be more costly to the government than just feeding them and training them to take care of themselves and their private areas.

I'd rather see the government develop competent training and intervention programs, but I think the powers that be would prefer to pretend that they don't exist at all.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
20. "Clintons?" I thought Hillary was FLOTUS then?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:13 PM
Apr 2016

It really is slimy to hang everything Bill signed onto around her neck. Cheap shots...all.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
21. Hillary served only four years as Secretary of State and eight years at most in Congress.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:17 PM
Apr 2016

That is not much experience for a presidential candidate -- unless you include as experience her time as FLOTUS.

From what I can tell, she counts her time as FLOTUS when it is convenient but doesn't want it counted when it is embarrassing. She can't have it both ways.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
42. She claims being first lady among her credentials
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 07:18 PM
Apr 2016

And so far as I know, hasn't denounced the nasty neoliberal shit of her husband's administration

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
32. yes,and this country has a lot of these types.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:48 PM
Apr 2016

and honest to God,who in the fuck, thinks it's ok to not give food to a hungry person? no
matter what their story is? gd assholes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

mpcamb

(2,878 posts)
47. Hmmmm 20 years.... Lemme do the math...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 08:09 PM
Apr 2016

1996 Who capitulated to the R's that year???

"The 20-year-old rule — which was suspended in many states during the economic recession — requires that adults without children or disabilities must have a job in order to receive food stamps through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program..."

Ah, Reaganomics, the trickle down promise.... Didn't work then, doesn't work now.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
24. You are correct those without children or dependents are the
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:32 PM
Apr 2016

ones who cannot get any other source of assistance. Food stamps is all they have.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
30. and all that time he was in office
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:44 PM
Apr 2016

I and a good friend who was more into politics and thus more up on things than I was - we both wondered what the hell was going on with the Democrats? Then, bamboozled by Bubba as we were, we voted for Clinton a second time. We were just two of the liberals who were deserted by the Democratic Party. I still remember the exodus of left-leaning Democrats stating "I'm not a liberal". Just about the only one who stood firm was Ted Kennedy, R.I.P.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
34. You and your friend are not by any means the only ones
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:55 PM
Apr 2016

bamboozled - we are in a long line. But not this time.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
36. I know - we were just 2
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:58 PM
Apr 2016

but I didnt' realize what was behind all that till I came to DU. I dont' know how I found this place, imperfect that it is especially in primary time. Nope I'm eyes wide open now. (My friend died a few years ago - ovarian cancer.)

StevieM

(10,500 posts)
6. It's disgusting that Kasich sets up one set of rules for urban voters and another set off rules
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 04:04 PM
Apr 2016

for rural voters. It really speaks to his character, or lack thereof.

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
7. This is something which should be a big convo starter for Bernie
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 04:17 PM
Apr 2016

He needs to come out and start screaming about this. It would seriously hurt Hillary

Tobin S.

(10,418 posts)
8. Kasich's good ol' boy down home personality deceives some people I think.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 04:21 PM
Apr 2016

He's the same GOP monstrosity as the rest of them- with a happy face.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
9. Who gets the money from Food Stamps? The poor don't
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 04:30 PM
Apr 2016

see any cash. That might be why Walmart closed a bunch of stores.

some guy

(3,448 posts)
12. Why . . .
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:09 PM
Apr 2016

Because we're a Fascist Empire in decline and are only interested in waging our global war of terror. Malignant neglect is simply a more subtle form of terror.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
14. "...a sin..."
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:35 PM
Apr 2016

And these assholes are going to determine who the "sinners" are?

How very Xtian of them.

 

maindawg

(1,151 posts)
15. Hmm
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 05:42 PM
Apr 2016

Lots of people make their money by their own means. They work flea markets, play music, do odd jobs, they have misseleneous income. Does that count as a job ?
Oh well figures kasic was the guy who led the charge in the war on poor people. Kasic is the real evil that Trump is portraying so garishly and kasic is the most dangerous Rethugs in the bunch. He is very cunning. He's a snake in the grass. Always dreaming up new ways to attack poor people.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,219 posts)
18. Do they report their income to the IRS?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:06 PM
Apr 2016

I realize they probably don't make enough to pay income tax, but technically they are self employed and should be paying Social Security and Medicare taxes on their first dollar. That's just the way it works.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
38. I gotta say that I'm way more concerned
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 07:01 PM
Apr 2016

about the corporations that pay exactly $0.00 in taxes. Also the ones leaving the country to avoid taxes. Lookin' at you, Pfizer.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,219 posts)
40. I am as well
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 07:09 PM
Apr 2016

But working for cash and not reporting income can bite you in the ass. For one thing, when you retire, there is no Social Security. If you become disabled, there is no disability. If you're lucky you can get SSI, but that's only $800 a month.

I met a man at the unemployment office. He worked for decades as a ranch hand for cash. He hurt his back and the man he worked for died. So he could work as a ranch hand any more and he had no references. He was in his late 40s. Who is going to hire someone like that?

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
45. That is true - no reporting = no record = no benefits
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 07:22 PM
Apr 2016

My longtime self-employed 69-yr-old hairdresser prefers cash. But then, i've learned from him over the years - he has money from his parents, investments, etc. He isn't cutting hair for survival, while the former ranch hand is up ye olde shit creek with no paddle.

OTOH some don't think ahead and there's nothing anyone can do. Or, maybe he thought he'd be able to keep working more or less indefinitely, which would be pretty unrealistic especially in a physically demanding job.

One more OTOH - maybe he worked for cash because the boss was too fucking cheap and he needed every cent. It should not be this way.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,219 posts)
49. I think many don't think ahead
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 09:36 PM
Apr 2016

Someone I knew became a widow at age 19 with a 1 year old son. Her husband was 10 years older, so he had a work record when he died. She got SS benefits as a widow and for her son. Since she did drugs, she decided to sell them for a living. (Great idea! I know). Eventually she got a straight job, but when she became disabled with Hep C, she had only contributed to SS for 10-15 years. So when she did finally get disability, she got less than $900 a month - just enough to make her ineligible for food stamps.

So now she supplements her SSDI by selling weed, even though if she was caught she would likely loose her SSDI. she never was much of a forward thinker.

SansACause

(520 posts)
19. Any Republicans?
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:10 PM
Apr 2016

I wonder because the Republicans won in a landslide in 2014 and took most of the state houses. They said they were going to do this. I wonder how many poor, white Republicans are about to go hungry?

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
22. Where in the Bible is the fib about "it's a sin not to help
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:28 PM
Apr 2016

oneself."?

Calvin the theologist also said that if the government was going to require people to work then the government had to provide jobs. As to a link I think that was in The Protestant Work Ethic.

Of course the rw churches have rewritten the entire theology.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
52. The last paragraph of the OP talks about sin. And anyone
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:39 AM
Apr 2016

who has put up with Calvinist Christians knows how they interpret it. I have heard it most of my life since I have been poor most of my life.

24601

(3,963 posts)
55. Kasich isn't Calvinist. He's Episcopal/Anglican - and one of our faith who came over from the Roman
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:28 PM
Apr 2016

Catholic faith. Projecting Calvinist thoughts onto US Episcopalians (we bad boys and girls are on Anglican double secret probation) isn't cool. Try again with the time-tested "whenever four Episcopalians are gathered, there will be a fifth.

I don't recommend looking too hard for a bible cite when you are talking to or about us Episcopalians. When we start a sentence, "I believe...." It's just as likely that the next words are "...that I'll have the Scotch...on the rocks, and please make that a double."

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
56. You must know that the faith based ideas are so intertwined
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 06:51 PM
Apr 2016

in today's America today that it is really hard to tell what is what. The ideas about the poor seem to appeal to every faith. I am Lutheran and there are many of us who believe that bull also. It is part of the Americanization of the churches.

BeyondGeography

(39,383 posts)
31. Compounded by the usual suspect states who don't use federal money to help their most vulnerable
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 06:44 PM
Apr 2016

people:

More than a million people received assistance last year in an employment and training program for SNAP recipients. But some states returned federal money to the government, and 21 states did not use any of the federal funds that were available to them in the program, federal officials said.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/04/02/us/politics/thousands-could-lose-food-stamps-as-states-restore-pre-recession-requirements.html?referer=https://www.google.com/

Judi Lynn

(160,631 posts)
51. These people are human beings, for christ's sake. The people who would harm them should be punished,
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:21 PM
Apr 2016

but since that's not possible, it should become necessary for their constituents to develop a moral sense, and NOT send them back to Washington.

I hope there's a giant Tasmanian Devil with a colossal flyswatter waiting to greet them when they pass over.

Blandocyte

(1,231 posts)
54. Jobs picking up rich folks' dogs' crap
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 04:47 PM
Apr 2016

being their pool boys, taking care of the rich's trust fund babies, etc. Get to work, youse! Sarky sarky.

Bozvotros

(785 posts)
57. Why is this the only kind of thing Repugs can get accomplished legislatively?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 07:40 PM
Apr 2016

I mean besides voting to repeal the ACA every couple of months. It is clear they feel a strong need to stick it to the poor. Gotta make sure those deadbeats aren't getting something for nothing, especially if they aren't white. That's only for the so called job creators who will love the increased traffic of those needing jobs and willing to take whatever pittance they offer. The Republican electorate consists of :

1.) Cold hearted wealthy folks of any color who have either inherited money or figured out how to use the system to make themselves rich off other peoples money or labor.

2.) white middle class workers who think it was only their hard work that brought them their tiny modicum of success and who look down on the struggling poor as lazy and or stupid

3.) A growing white under class willing to cut their own throat to keep people of color from getting any government assistance because they believe lazy colored people are the main reason they can't get ahead.

4. Fundamentalist religious zealots, ammophiles and xenophobes who are deathly afraid of something that won't happen and who have a need to either exterminate, imprison, torture or deport anyone who doesn't agree with them.

liberalhistorian

(20,819 posts)
58. And we have the Clintons to thank
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:09 PM
Apr 2016

for pushing that ridiculous "reform" bill through in the 90's, with little consideration or accounting for economic conditions or availability of jobs. That and the crime bill they so eagerly championed have done tremendous damage to so many people and communities.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Why tens of thousands of ...