Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 08:44 AM Apr 2016

Los Angeles County violated Constitution by putting Christian cross on seal: judge

Source: RAWSTORY

A federal judge has ruled that Los Angeles County violated the U.S. and state constitutions by placing a tiny cross atop a depiction of a California mission on its official seal, despite claims by local leaders that it was done for historical accuracy.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Christina Snyder comes in response to a lawsuit filed by civil liberties activists and others who objected to the inclusion of a religious symbol on a government emblem and marks the latest twist in a six-decade saga that has seen the county seal redesigned three times.

The judge granted a permanent injunction against the county’s use of the seal, presumably requiring another make over unless her order is overturned on appeal.

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/los-angeles-county-violated-constitution-by-putting-christian-cross-on-seal-judge/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Los Angeles County violated Constitution by putting Christian cross on seal: judge (Original Post) left-of-center2012 Apr 2016 OP
Cross - unacceptable, "In God we Trust" - acceptable??? Herman4747 Apr 2016 #1
The cross is an Xtian symbol, the name for the deity is not, it is generic. bemildred Apr 2016 #2
The name "Los Angeles" is also a christian name aggiesal Apr 2016 #3
Maybe they can appeal in "Sacramento". Throd Apr 2016 #4
Yet another religious name ... aggiesal Apr 2016 #5

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. The cross is an Xtian symbol, the name for the deity is not, it is generic.
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:20 AM
Apr 2016

The deity, being the deity, must be unique, maximal, since it rules all. "God" is (theoretically) OK, but Allah, Jehovah, Shiva, etc. are not.

I dont agree, I think "no religion" mean no religion, nothing about religion in politics, religious arguments have no weight in law or politics, except as the opinions of certain people, who have the right to hold them, as long as the behave and uphold the law themselves.

But that is the argument as I've seen it.

aggiesal

(8,921 posts)
3. The name "Los Angeles" is also a christian name
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:38 PM
Apr 2016

So, let's change the name of the city as well.

Los Angeles is "The Angels" in Spanish.

In New Mexico, there is a city named Las Cruces or "The Crosses" in Spanish,
I guess we'll have to change that name as well.

aggiesal

(8,921 posts)
5. Yet another religious name ...
Fri Apr 8, 2016, 01:50 PM
Apr 2016

Should change Sacramento (Sacrament in Spanish) as well.

Nicely done.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Los Angeles County violat...