Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:00 PM Apr 2016

Russian Censorship Group Seeks Chinese Help to Better Control Internet

Source: VOA

MOSCOW— Russian authorities are seeking greater control of information on the internet, with some who favor tighter restrictions looking to China. Russia's Safe Internet League, an influential lobby, hosted a first-ever forum Wednesday in Moscow with China's top internet censors, including Fang Binxing, known as the "Father of the Great Firewall of China." Comments from speakers at the event underscored the desire for authorities to further limit and control information online.

Lu Wei, China’s cybersecurity and internet policy chief, is shown at the World Internet Conference in Wuzhen, China, Nov. 19, 2014. He reportedly said at a recent Russian forum that online freedom was not a right but a responsibility to be kept in check. Fang lectured on “cyber sovereignty,” arguing that countries’ borders apply to the online world as well and foreign “interference” should not be tolerated.

China’s cybersecurity and internet policy chief Lu Wei said that online freedom was not a right but a responsibility to be kept in check lest it lead to terrorism, according to a tweet from a Financial Times reporter. Lu echoed Kremlin rhetoric, saying Western media were waging an “information war” against their countries.

Both Chinese and Russian speakers lamented American companies’ dominance of the internet. Konstantin Malofeev, who is chairman of the Safe Internet League and is linked to both the Kremlin and the Russia-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine, said Russia should learn from China’s internet censorship practices and assert its sovereignty online.
...
“I think this reflects their level of desperation inside of the Kremlin,” said Andrei Soldatov, co-author of "The Red Web: The Struggle Between Russia's Digital Dictators and the New Online Revolutionaries," who spoke to VOA via Skype. “They have these coming elections. And, it seems they need desperately to find some sort of solution to be absolutely sure that they can control the internet before the elections.”

Read more: http://www.voanews.com/content/russian-censorship-group-seeks-chinese-help-better-control-internet/3308924.html

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russian Censorship Group Seeks Chinese Help to Better Control Internet (Original Post) uhnope Apr 2016 OP
someone needs to blanket the world with free wifi satellites Sunlei Apr 2016 #1
He forgot that this headline has a mirror image: forest444 Apr 2016 #2
Where does this article say anything about censorship? Democat May 2016 #4
thank you uhnope May 2016 #5
You're going to sit there and call people names all day long? forest444 May 2016 #6
So thin-skinned. That's exactly the attitude that brought us Dubya. forest444 May 2016 #7
I think the issue people are having is that there is little hesitance for people to criticize the US PersonNumber503602 May 2016 #14
That's just what I told OLTG below, when he mentioned that many in gov. find the policy justifiable. forest444 May 2016 #17
Weren't you just complaining about name calling? pintobean May 2016 #15
If you consider that name calling, forest444 May 2016 #16
I don't know what "think-skinned" means pintobean May 2016 #18
What, you've never seen a typo? forest444 May 2016 #19
Doesn't mention Censorship from NSA? One_Life_To_Give May 2016 #8
But it's very effective at fostering the most insidous censorship of all: forest444 May 2016 #9
Doubt most Europeans give a crap what NSA thinks of their posts One_Life_To_Give May 2016 #10
I hope you're right. forest444 May 2016 #12
"I don't think anyone seriously doubts that it's used to blackmail people of influence " uhnope May 2016 #11
I would give you examples of how the NSA blackmails citizens, but they are blackmailing me PersonNumber503602 May 2016 #13
That idea is actually older than the internet. DetlefK Apr 2016 #3
kick Blue_Tires May 2016 #20

Democat

(11,617 posts)
4. Where does this article say anything about censorship?
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:35 AM
May 2016

Do you post a reactionary "America sucks" reply to every thread?

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
5. thank you
Sun May 1, 2016, 04:42 AM
May 2016

yes, it seems that poster or someone has to stink up almost every thread that way. It's either clinical or professional

forest444

(5,902 posts)
6. You're going to sit there and call people names all day long?
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:06 PM
May 2016

Last edited Sun May 1, 2016, 01:01 PM - Edit history (1)

DU is not a schoolyard you know.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
7. So thin-skinned. That's exactly the attitude that brought us Dubya.
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:11 PM
May 2016

Criticism is the cornerstone of democracy, as anyone on DU will tell you.

I'm surprised you don't know that, having already been here for 15 years.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
14. I think the issue people are having is that there is little hesitance for people to criticize the US
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

on this site and on many other sites. In fact we can go to the front page and find many threads and discussions that are critical of the US. Which is fine and not many people take issue with that, as many feel that "criticism is the cornerstone of democracy". It's just weird that when negative information about other countries come up, particularly China or Russia, there is always someone there to direct the conversation away from them and back to the US. This is despite the fact there are likely thousands or even tens of thousands of threads about the NSA programs. If someone posted a new news article about some recently discovered NSA program that put cameras in every American's bathroom, wouldn't you find it odd if someone posted a link to the story about Russia's attempt to emulate the Chinese censorship in some attempt to minimize the NSA spycams?

The vast majority of the posts in this thread are about the US rather than Russia. Not fully your fault, as everyone (including myself) responding are contributing to it, but it does seem like a problem. You also didn't state your opinion about what the article is about. Do you care, or do you only care about the America because you feel the US is the greatest country in the world and the only country that matters?

forest444

(5,902 posts)
17. That's just what I told OLTG below, when he mentioned that many in gov. find the policy justifiable.
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:52 PM
May 2016

I'm sure they do, and can even rationalize it pretty well - but that's exactly what the Russias and the Chinas of the world tell their own people.

It's still an extremely slippery slope, especially given what we know know about how little the NSA actually oversees these programs. I'm sure the countries doing this have this same problem (we know the U.K. does).

And yes, I suppose I do care at least a little. I wouldn't bother posting my thoughts on the matter otherwise, let me tell you.

Thank you for your very well-considered reply, btw. A real contribution to the discussion at hand, and something a couple of these others could definitely take a page from.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
15. Weren't you just complaining about name calling?
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:32 PM
May 2016

Yeah, I even served on the 1-6 leave it jury for that complaint. Now you're calling someone thin skinned.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
18. I don't know what "think-skinned" means
Sun May 1, 2016, 02:16 PM
May 2016

but, I was going by your apparent standards. I don't think you were called a name, yet we got an alert and a whine.

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
8. Doesn't mention Censorship from NSA?
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:16 PM
May 2016

Reading what people say/do and possibly try to hide on the internet is not the same as censoring. NSA monitoring and the Great Firewall of China are two totally different programs. Both in terms of how they do it as well as the goals of doing it.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
9. But it's very effective at fostering the most insidous censorship of all:
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:22 PM
May 2016

Self-censorship.

I don't think anyone seriously doubts that it's used to blackmail people of influence as well - particularly those in politics and the press.

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
10. Doubt most Europeans give a crap what NSA thinks of their posts
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:32 PM
May 2016

Just as most american's don't care what China thinks about their opinions posted on the net either. The CIA is instead relegated to having it's own fact check site to try and counter (dis)information in a public way, which is as free speech/thought/expression should be.
Not at all the same as China's Firewall and certainly less effective than China's tying citizens financial/credit ratings to their posting history and friends history of support/dissent with their anointed leaders.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
12. I hope you're right.
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:41 PM
May 2016

But remember that that's exactly what the Russians and Chinese tell their people.

And as under-regulated as we know know the access to such information at the NSA to be, the odds of it being misused are probably very good.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
11. "I don't think anyone seriously doubts that it's used to blackmail people of influence "
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:33 PM
May 2016

oh, please tell us more about this CT. The NSA is blackmailing people? Really?

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
13. I would give you examples of how the NSA blackmails citizens, but they are blackmailing me
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:21 PM
May 2016

and that prevents me from sharing this information. Seriously.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
3. That idea is actually older than the internet.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:13 PM
Apr 2016

William Gibson wrote the sci-fi "Neuromancer"-trilogy, accidently predicting things like the internet, virtual reality, social media...

In his novels, there is the lunatic, insulated and insanely rich Tessier-Ashpool clan. They made their fortune by renting out internet-servers in orbit.

----------------

Space is international territory. This server-in-space-thing could work... until Russia and China start actively shooting them down.

And there's the risk of crime and terrorism with these independent servers.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russian Censorship Group ...