Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kadaholo

(304 posts)
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:04 PM May 2016

California Back in Big Oil's Crosshairs as Feds Quietly OK Offshore Fracking

Source: CommonDreams by Staff Writer Nadia Prupis

Two federal agencies on Friday quietly finalized two reports, set for release next week, that found offshore fracking in California poses no "significant" risk to the environment—paving the way for oil and gas companies to resume the controversial extraction method in the Santa Barbara Channel and imperiling the region's wildlife in the process, opponents said. The announcement Friday from the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (OEM) and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement puts an end to a court-ordered ban on offshore fracking in federal waters off the coast of California. The moratorium was put into place in January as part of a settlement with the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), which challenged the Obama administration's 'rubber-stamping' of offshore drilling activity without an environmental review.

Environmental activists warned on Friday that kicking off a new round of drilling in the area puts wildlife at risk from chemical-laden wastewater and said they would be willing to file another lawsuit to keep it from happening. "The Obama administration is once again putting California's beautiful coast in the oil industry's crosshairs," said Miyoko Sakashita, director of CBD's Oceans program. "Our beaches and wildlife face a renewed threat from fracking chemicals and oil spills. New legal action may be the only way to get federal officials to do their jobs and protect our ocean from offshore fracking."

Wenonah Hauter, executive director of the environmental advocacy group Food & Water Watch, criticized President Barack Obama for "doubling down on fracking, instead of providing climate leadership and protecting our communities and our environment." "This move paves the way for offshore fracking permits that were previously frozen and the dumping of toxic wastewater directly into the Pacific Ocean where Californians swim, fish, and surf," Hauter said. The news comes a year after a pipeline rupture in Santa Barbara sent tens of thousands of gallons of crude spilling onto public beaches and into the Pacific Ocean. The operator of the pipeline, Plains All American, has a history of wreaking environmental havoc throughout Southern California and elsewhere.

And it also follows the recent signing of the historic deal reached in Paris last December to keep global temperature rise under 2°C, a goal that climate advocates say can only be reached by keeping fossil fuels in the ground and investing in renewal energy. "It's clear that Americans want an inspiring new vision for our energy system," Hauter said. "The president continues to indicate that he is not the person to fulfill that vision. It’s a vision that can only be achieved by keeping fossil fuels in the ground and moving swiftly to a system driven by energy efficiency and renewables."


Read more: http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/05/28/california-back-big-oils-crosshairs-feds-quietly-ok-offshore-fracking
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Back in Big Oil's Crosshairs as Feds Quietly OK Offshore Fracking (Original Post) kadaholo May 2016 OP
this makes me furious oldandhappy May 2016 #1
What could *possibly* go wrong? Moostache May 2016 #2
This is so disappointing passiveporcupine May 2016 #3
Jerry Brown wont oppose that, not sincerely reddread May 2016 #12
what is the obsession with destroying the planet as fast as possible? hollysmom May 2016 #4
I guess the plan is to strip the planet and then move into their domed city LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #21
Or something along the lines of Elysium. forest444 May 2016 #32
Hopefully this will be publicized quickly and widely through California. JudyM May 2016 #5
Bernie needs to make an immediate ad about this in California stuffmatters May 2016 #27
+1. How to get that moving? JudyM May 2016 #28
I'm thinking send news to twitters of Digby, Paul Rosenberg, Michael Hilzik for starters stuffmatters May 2016 #30
I'm not on Twitter either. Anybody else here? JudyM May 2016 #31
What the hell. onecaliberal May 2016 #6
this must be addressed - now! hopemountain May 2016 #7
California is STILL amidst a historic drought. Fracking uses MILLIONS of gallons of water Triana May 2016 #8
Umm, California has plenty of saltwater Brother Buzz May 2016 #16
Also I thought the SB area had a desalinization plant to bring fresh h2O during droughts Person 2713 May 2016 #24
Offshore fracking? What could possibly go wrong?! Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #9
I know, right? Crash2Parties May 2016 #22
That Obama-Hope and Change it is. jalan48 May 2016 #10
I think you are right. 840high May 2016 #11
folks in Santa Barbara area.... dhill926 May 2016 #13
Damn, Obama must want as much money as Hillary zalinda May 2016 #14
that was a stupid comment olddad56 May 2016 #19
Really, then why would he let this happen zalinda May 2016 #20
This is an example of the madness that is permitted because of Neoliberalism AZ Progressive May 2016 #15
What. The. Fuck. abelenkpe May 2016 #17
DAMN! elleng May 2016 #18
Fracking is one think... Jnclr89 May 2016 #23
Because???? freebrew May 2016 #25
FFS!!!!! n/t RKP5637 May 2016 #26
This administration's antipathy for wilderness and wildlife rivals the GOP's... villager May 2016 #29

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
2. What could *possibly* go wrong?
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:26 PM
May 2016

I mean, its not like fracking has caused enormous spikes in tectonic activity in say Oklahoma or anything.

Why not disturb the San Andreas?
It'll be fine...
Trust me.

(says the guy in the silk suit with an Exxon-Mobil business card...)

 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
12. Jerry Brown wont oppose that, not sincerely
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:58 PM
May 2016

the entire rest of the state minus a few profiteers would.
lets see what happens.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
4. what is the obsession with destroying the planet as fast as possible?
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:30 PM
May 2016

Do oil execs want to see the "last days" in their lifetime?

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
27. Bernie needs to make an immediate ad about this in California
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:37 PM
May 2016

Bernie Sanders on record as resolutely anti-fracking, the only candidate of either party who is. Californians need to be warned about
this egregious threat to our coasts asap, while they still have time to vote for the only candidate who will stand against this insanity.

stuffmatters

(2,574 posts)
30. I'm thinking send news to twitters of Digby, Paul Rosenberg, Michael Hilzik for starters
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:39 PM
May 2016

Maybe #Bernie, Save California's Ocean from Frackers and then copy of the Common Dreams article.

I think these three widely read SoCa journalists(Rosenberg Long Beach & Digby Santa Monica for Salon, Hilzik for L.A. Times) are all still neutral on Bernie vs Hillary and they are aware enough to know that only Sanders unilaterally stands against fracking.

If I were more computer literate (like knew how to make an email out of a news story) or were on twitter I'd do it. Twitter addresses @digby56,@PaulHRosenberg@hiltzikm.



hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
7. this must be addressed - now!
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:45 PM
May 2016

we have so much work to do to stop this fracking business. according to reports, we have 5Xs the oil reserves we will ever need stored around the country - but primarily below ground off the texas shore.

what is the point of continued oil extraction? well, to sell to china, of course!

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
8. California is STILL amidst a historic drought. Fracking uses MILLIONS of gallons of water
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:47 PM
May 2016

for EACH fracked well and that water, once used for this purpose is NOT reusable.

Brother Buzz

(36,407 posts)
16. Umm, California has plenty of saltwater
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:18 PM
May 2016

and in most situations, saltwater will work well, although I'd hate to see the rest of the toxic shit they use in their secret 'fracking cocktail' escape into the marine environment.

Person 2713

(3,263 posts)
24. Also I thought the SB area had a desalinization plant to bring fresh h2O during droughts
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:22 AM
May 2016

Won't that be the same salt h2O area used in fracking that is a concern regarding marine life ?
They already had a pipe burst yuck
nothanks on tasty toxins

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
22. I know, right?
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:42 AM
May 2016

It's not like fracking results in toxic waste pretty much everywhere around the wells, or anything...

zalinda

(5,621 posts)
14. Damn, Obama must want as much money as Hillary
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:14 PM
May 2016

when he hits her age. I mean he has that 5 million dollar house to pay for.

Z

zalinda

(5,621 posts)
20. Really, then why would he let this happen
Sat May 28, 2016, 10:19 PM
May 2016

ANY thinking person would know that this is a disaster waiting to happen, or does no one remember The Gulf of Mexico? At least in the Gulf, it could be some what contained, if something happens here, it's goodbye oceans, because you know, no one would find out about it until it was too late.

Just when I thought he couldn't get much lower than TPP, he does this.

Z

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
15. This is an example of the madness that is permitted because of Neoliberalism
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:17 PM
May 2016

Something that establishment Democrats seem to approve of.

 

Jnclr89

(128 posts)
23. Fracking is one think...
Sun May 29, 2016, 02:46 AM
May 2016

legal or not. Fracking of the coast of Santa Barbara, California is another. The ecological effect is uncertain, if not tragic.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
25. Because????
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:42 AM
May 2016

they don't have enough earthquakes in the area?


I thought we elected a Democrat. Who is he really working for?
Certainly not the people's interests.(Well, maybe the rich ones).

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
29. This administration's antipathy for wilderness and wildlife rivals the GOP's...
Sun May 29, 2016, 07:41 PM
May 2016

Not quite the "change" I was "hoping" for...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California Back in Big Oi...