Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,515 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 06:57 PM Jun 2016

Judge rejects claim alleging illegal purge of election rolls

Source: Associated Press

Judge rejects claim alleging illegal purge of election rolls

Updated 5:24 pm, Wednesday, June 29, 2016

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A judge has rejected a lawsuit brought by voting rights groups that alleged Ohio's process for purging election rolls is illegally removing eligible voters.

The lawsuit was filed in April in federal court in Columbus and contended the state's system removes registered voters based on their failure to vote. It specifically alleged the illegal cancellation of registered voters who are homeless.

Judge George Smith said Wednesday that Ohio's procedures for maintaining voter registration rolls ensure the integrity of the election process.

Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted (HYOO'-sted) says the state manages voter rolls according to state and federal law. He says the ruling allows the state to put "another wasteful lawsuit" behind it and focus on the important work of running elections.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Judge-rejects-claim-alleging-illegal-purge-of-8332833.php



(Short article, no more at link.)
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
2. This is really sad, and does not bode well for the GE.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:29 PM
Jun 2016

Giving swing-state Ohio a green light to purge away as many Democratic
voters as they wish. It is no accident Husted is Republican.

I really hope the plaintiff's appeal this asap.

mpcamb

(2,870 posts)
3. This seems like it needs an appeal.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:15 PM
Jun 2016

Simply put, voting rights matter.
Taking that right away by an arbitrary purge flies in the face of reason and citizen rights.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
4. In Oregon, people have to "opt out" to not be registered
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jun 2016

Folks are automatically registered to vote when they are issued a drivers license.

I love my reliably blue state.

JudyM

(29,225 posts)
5. Research on organ donors in Europe shows that opt-out countries have far more donors than opt-in
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 11:13 PM
Jun 2016

countries, too. Administrative intent is a powerful thing. Do you know if OR has a higher turnout rate? (Turnout meaning mail-in)

JudyM

(29,225 posts)
7. Thanks, that is an interesting read. Especially Alaska and MN. We ought to have something on
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 01:53 PM
Jun 2016

the dem platform addressing this -- like a commitment to remove barriers to voting and of course ensuring security of the voting process. ReThugs claim to clamor for security but it's really about erecting participation barriers.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge rejects claim alleg...