Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson is collapsing in the polls
Source: International Business Times
25 OCT 2016 AT 13:19 ET
Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson had hoped to take advantage of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's record unpopularity and play spoiler in the upcoming presidential election. Now that is looking less likely.
Johnson's poll numbers have been in free fall since August, when he was polling in the low double digits. He now sits at just six points on average. While that would be a significantly larger share of the popular vote than most third party candidates would normally receive, it will not make Johnson a big factor in November.
A new CNN-ORC poll released Monday revealed that Johnson is down four percentage points from the same poll in October. In that same span of time, Clinton and Trump each gained 2 percentage points. The exodus of Johnson's support to Clinton and Trump appears to be concentrated among men. Johnson lost seven percentage points in the polls among men, but none from women. Those men split between Clinton and Trump roughly evenly. It is looking less and less likely that Gary Johnson will play spoiler in November's presidential election. Photo: Reuters
Johnson's sagging polling could be a result of the penchant he has shown for gaffes and his apparent lack of knowledge on certain issues, especially regarding foreign policy he famously asked "What is Aleppo?" in response to a question on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" about the Syrian city at the heart of the refugee crisis. Johnson could also be suffering from the natural tendency of voters to swing to the major party candidates as the election draws nearer. But this was supposed to be an election where third party candidates like Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein could make headway, thanks to the polarization caused by Clinton and Trump. Johnson is nowhere near the almost 19 percent of the popular vote independent candidate Ross Perot the most successful third party candidate in modern history claimed in the 1992 election when he played spoiler to Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush. Even then, Perot was still not able to secure an electoral vote.
-snip-
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/libertarian-presidential-candidate-gary-johnson-is-collapsing-in-the-polls/
TonyPDX
(962 posts)Coolest Ranger
(2,034 posts)to the Reverend Al show I'm thinking of. He always calls in and complains about lack of Gary Johnson coverage.
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,031 posts)I was hoping he would siphon off a few more of the Donald's supporters.
TeamPooka
(24,223 posts)Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)The reason they even considered Gary in the first place is they thought he was a reasonable, "Republican Lite" alternative to the raving maniac. So they will now either vote for Hillary or just not vote, period--both of which help Hillary.
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)..."What's a poll"?
LisaM
(27,806 posts)Not only is that funny, it sounds a lot like "What's Aleppo"?
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)Wait ... isn't that the Swiss cheese?
onehandle
(51,122 posts)FSogol
(45,481 posts)Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)FSogol
(45,481 posts)all the votes are counted.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)when the article in question is discussing an enemy and/or opponent, but instead simply randomly respond? Your wording also carried no trace of of being a prediction of his eventual numbers. It faced up as a direct comment that insinuates he has dropped from 5% to 0.7%, which is non factual.
FSogol
(45,481 posts)some data on methane to prove that his collapse is not similar to the properties of a fart?
BTW, Johnson, like most libertarians, is too lame to be an enemy or a credible opponent. That's a fact.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)not only an enemy, but credible as a threat as well.
Nader ring a bell?
If you look at many state polls, Hillary does worse in terms of spread size vs the Shitgibbon in a 4 way race versus a 2 way choice.
keithbvadu2
(36,788 posts)JI7
(89,248 posts)PSPS
(13,594 posts)murielm99
(30,736 posts)I think "propaganda."
Whoever is saying that or writing that can go to hell. If I can tell them to his or her face, I will. I am sick of being nice to propagandists.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I'm old enough to remember when the libertarians had the pride to at least field halfway competent candidates...
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)They show up every 4 years, make some noise, then disappear.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Since it's probably going to be a done deal in California -thereby making it virtually impossible for prohibition to continue much longer federally in any real, intrusive sense- and because our Party (thanks in part to Sen. Sanders' advocacy on the matter) has embraced a pathway to legalization in our platform, Johnson's appeal is pretty nonexistent.
stopbush
(24,396 posts)The fact that he's collapsing in the polls, or the fact that so many people were backing his candidacy?
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)genuinely nice person but his politics veer far right.
Early on in the veering to the far right, I bail.
4lbs
(6,855 posts)that were detailed and actually doable, like Hillary did.
Motley13
(3,867 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Kennah
(14,261 posts)Jim Dandy
(358 posts)As it should.