Trump Just Dismissed the People in Charge of Maintaining Our Nuclear Arsenal
Source: Gizmodo
Between the Trump transition teams infighting, incompetence, and high-profile resignations, any decisions that signaled even a modicum of stability for the country would come as a relief at this point. Unfortunately, the nascent Trump Administration isnt inclined to calm anyones nerves. According to an official within the Department of Energy, this past Friday, the President-elects team instructed the head of the National Nuclear Security Administration and his deputy to clean out their desks when Trump takes office on January 20th.
The NNSA is the $12 billion-a-year agency that maintains and enhances the safety, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile. Its unclear when the two officials will be replaced.
Traditionally, all political appointees of an outgoing presidential administration turn in resignation letters effective on noon of inauguration day, January 20. But appointees in key positionslike the people who make sure our nukes workare often asked to stay on in their roles until a replacement can be found and confirmed by the Senate, helping ensure a smooth transition and allowing our government to continue functioning. In fact, for the entirety of Obamas first term and into part of his second, the NNSA Administrator remained a Bush appointee.
Trump, however, appears determined to immediately push out everyone who was appointed by Obama, regardless of whether or not he has anyone in line for the job. Or, as our source put it: Its a shocking disregard for process and continuity of government.
Read more: http://gizmodo.com/trump-just-dismissed-the-people-in-charge-of-maintainin-1790908093
The Great Purge continues. Making America Great Again by weakening the agency which oversees and maintains our nuclear arsenal. Trump's recklessness puts us all in greater danger.
MBS
(9,688 posts)kimbutgar
(21,153 posts)After all they probably have been hacking into the system for years since the rethugs refused to fund upgrades.
I am beginning to think seriously the rethug party are sleeper cells of Russian influence.
Orrex
(63,213 posts)They'll be in a position to give extensive access to US intelligence data, procedures and operatives, thereby permanently and irretrievably crippling the nation's defense strategy.
But by all means, the GOP Congress should repeal the ACA first, and maybe investigate Benghazi a few more times.
WhiteTara
(29,716 posts)Trump is the head puppet.
Response to kimbutgar (Reply #2)
Name removed Message auto-removed
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)kimbutgar
(21,153 posts)xor
(1,204 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,715 posts)in the USA when conservatives voted in someone into office that is continually disarming us and making us vulnerable to our enemies.
atreides1
(16,079 posts)When has the US military protected our freedoms?
7962
(11,841 posts)They would have had little opposition taking the rest of Europe or here if they wanted. Not to mention the Chinese
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Solly Mack
(90,767 posts)To say the least.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Big_K
(237 posts)Cuban Missile Crisis, living in Jacksonville Florida, Naval Air Station about 3 miles across the St. Johns River from my elementary school, and Mayport, base of the 6th fleet at that time, about a 30 minute drive away.
We boys thought the dog tags we got were really cool. Like the ARMY! Of course, what's the main purpose of dog tags? Perhaps identifying the dead?
We brought gallon jugs of water and cans of diet meal replacement shakes to school, and did "drills" where Moms with station wagons were going to take us to safety in St. Augustine. Another 30 minute drive away, right down US 1.
Now I'm just gonna going to say fuck it and let the blast take me away.
SnowCritter
(810 posts)I, too, remember doing that in elementary school.
MsInformed
(48 posts)to Russian contractors.
The ones with the lowest bid and then he's not going to pay them.
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)Response to Renew Deal (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
lastlib
(23,238 posts)ifyagetmymeanin'..........
tinrobot
(10,902 posts)You can't say we weren't warned.
Fuck everyone who voted for this dangerous clown... and all those who didn't vote.
citizen blues
(570 posts)And fuck everyone who threw away their votes. I didn't get to vote for who I wanted either.
But you can't say you weren't warned.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)if the bombs, facilities using nuclear material(s) become unsafe, MILLIONS of americans wittingly or less rare unwittingly voted for this to happen, what's the big deal. We have a madman maniac for POTUS and now all of us have to just suck it up!!!!!!!!!
Botany
(70,508 posts)"Several months ago, a foreign policy expert on the international level went to advise Donald
Trump. And three times [Trump] asked about the use of nuclear weapons. Three times he asked
at one point if we had them why can't we use them," Scarborough said on his "Morning Joe"
program.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/03/trump-asks-why-us-cant-use-nukes-msnbcs-joe-scarborough-reports.html
Crash2Parties
(6,017 posts)Girard442
(6,075 posts)...who might go insubordinant when the orange man-baby throws a button-pushing tantrum.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)almost as if he's taking his marching orders from a hostile nation.
colorado_ufo
(5,734 posts)We can all be happy about that right?
riversedge
(70,233 posts)IMHO!!
... But appointees in key positionslike the people who make sure our nukes workare often asked to stay on in their roles until a replacement can be found and confirmed by the Senate, helping ensure a smooth transition and allowing our government to continue functioning. In fact, for the entirety of Obamas first term and into part of his second, the NNSA Administrator remained a Bush appointee.
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--6Fjcgrz7--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/tjdejne8vvpon7nmzqhs.jpg
haele
(12,657 posts)There will be a change notice in each department promulgated by the outgoing appointee - a "delegation of authority" that can be passed down to cover the period between the old boss and the new boss. It's something that typically happens over the holidays or when the appointee has to be out of office for a while, but I've seen official delegations last for as long as a year while the Government scrambles for a suitable replacement for a retiree at a high level.
The amount of immediate purging his administration would have to do to get "their people" in charge down the two or three levels to really ensure they change Federal policy in critical key departments with their people in charge in most of these departments would result in hundreds of thousands of people, if not closer to a million suddenly losing their jobs by the end of Q3 FY17. Everyone in the Country will have at least a personal relative or a relative of a friend affected.
This would be something that can't be hidden or explained away as "political/transitional business as usual". And what it would do to the economy would tank it.
So honestly, I'm not as concerned about the appointees as I am about the requests for the transition team on who is working what projects, or what positions they hold within the government. The first shows a petty temperament and a shallow understanding on how government works.
When they start looking at who's been doing the work as a career, at who has "corporate knowledge" of what is going on and how to get the projects completed and the service provided, then I really get worried.
Haele
TNNurse
(6,926 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Holy fuck
barbtries
(28,795 posts)it gets a little more surreal every day.
woodsprite
(11,915 posts)Don't know gizmodo's rep, other ones I found talking about it were political wire blog, and tree of liberty (ewww, I disinfected myself after visiting that site). Rawstory has it, but it was just a repost of gizmodo's article.
JHan
(10,173 posts)Still, the fact it's entirely believable is what's frightening.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)As in everything he is doing.
He will install HIS goons// as do all dictators..
It is not the Russians I am so worried about now. It is HIM!!! And his gestapo!
nancy1942
(635 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)How is this possible.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)yes, he can fire anyone anytime after that.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)Botany
(70,508 posts)Vinca
(50,273 posts)AwakeAtLast
(14,126 posts)Possibly literally.
orleans
(34,052 posts)such as washington post, nytimes, latimes, cnn (simply to corroborate & verify this story)
none have reported this that i can find
and if this story is true then wtf is wrong with these news outlets. you'd think something like this is rather fucking important and newsworthy
redwitch
(14,944 posts)And finding nothing to back up Gizmodo. I pray they are wrong!
orleans
(34,052 posts)that basically the story is bullshit
http://www.defensenews.com/articles/nnsa-denies-report-top-nuclear-officials-removed-by-trump-team
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)A top secret security clearance takes a minimum of 4 months and up to a year.
onenote
(42,703 posts)the difference is that when it was vacant, you had an experienced Principal Deputy to fill the gap. If the story is correct and both the administrator and the principal deputy are being let go, that is a serious problem.
world wide wally
(21,743 posts)Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)Dismissing nuke staff?!?! Using his personal security detachment instead of the Secret Service?!?!
This sounds like the beginning of the plot of one of those spy-action-war Clanceyesque novel.
He appoints people that will be loyal to him to control the nukes and he is surrounding himself with people loyal to him and not the constitution and the American people.
I'm not a person to get all worried about conspiracy nonsense, but things are shaping up to be very scary indeed.
Turbineguy
(37,332 posts)Please do not give Trump access to the launch codes.
lark
(23,102 posts)He'd love to see our nukes mishandled and don the con is too stupid to realize why. He thinks that Putin is on his side, and that's just really scary.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,319 posts)Quote of the day.
MBS
(9,688 posts)Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)kacekwl
(7,017 posts)This guy can't have this kind of power. The military took an oath to protect the country. If they don't have the power to stop this can't they file a lawsuit to tie his hands in court. Surely the Supreme Court will rule in the countrys interest. If not we have lost all hope.
ffr
(22,670 posts)Fcuk me!
Norbert
(6,040 posts)I live near GE Aircraft Engines, If all hell breaks loose GE will be a huge crater and I will be a pile of ash.
What a dumb shit he is.
LiberalLoner
(9,761 posts)Is relatively high up in the chain of command for NNSA. There are positions that are political appointees, and they always tender their resignations when a new President steps in. Yeah it might be nice to have a delay but nothing awful is going to happen in the meantime. People like my husband and his boss will step up to the plate and get the work done.
No worries, America. Not as far as the NNSA and it's mission are concerned, at least.
Lots of other things to worry about, but no need to worry about this one.
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)bdamomma
(63,849 posts)oh geez, thanks so much for calming everyone's fear.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)FrodosNewPet
(495 posts)Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)tavernier
(12,389 posts)States that Gizmodo article is false.
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)Anywho, here is a Business Insider report that cites the NNSA denial and why it doesn't make sense:
http://www.businessinsider.com/nuke-safety-leaders-allegedly-fired-by-trump-2017-1
orleans
(34,052 posts)Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)"An anonymous NNSA official cited by Defense News denies Klotz and Creedon were dismissed. "There have been no discussions between the president-elects transition team and any of NNSAs political appointees on extending their public service past Jan. 20," the official said.
If Klotz and Creedon were dismissed, it "doesn't make any sense," Joe Cirincione, president of the Ploughshares Fund (a global security foundation) and a nuclear policy expert, told Business Insider.
"It's another one of the unprecedented moves that Trump sees as a clean sweep but could be very bad for the country," Cirincione said. "You really don't want to strip away the senior management of your nuclear weapons without naming a replacement. The nukes are basically home alone if you do that.""
orleans
(34,052 posts)tavernier
(12,389 posts)I would link, but my phone is not agreeable today. But easy to google.
area51
(11,909 posts)Trump is the most corrupt president in US history.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Isn't this what we have always tried to prevent and stop at all costs?
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)They are barely relevent to the operation or function of federal agencies.