Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,522 posts)
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 11:11 AM Mar 2017

Border agent lawyer asks court to bar video evidence in murder case

Source: Associated Press


BY ASSOCIATED PRESS | March 21, 2017 @ 5:02 am






TUCSON, Ariz. — The attorney for a Border Patrol agent charged with second-degree murder in the fatal cross-border shooting of a Mexican teen is asking the court to bar video evidence, saying the agency didn’t hold on to original copies of the footage.

Attorney Sean Chapman filed the motion earlier this month asking a judge to exclude the video and re-creations. Chapman says the copies are “highly compressed and deeply flawed.”

The motion was filed in the case against Lonnie Swartz, who faces trial later this year for the October 2012 shooting of 16-year-old Jose Antonio Elena Rodriguez.

Swartz is accused of firing through the border fence into Nogales, Sonora, and striking Elena Rodriguez about 10 times. He says Elena Rodriguez threw rocks at him, endangering his life. But the boy’s family says he was just walking home after a game of basketball with friends.



Read more: http://ktar.com/story/1499758/border-agent-lawyer-asks-court-to-bar-video-evidence-in-murder-case/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Border agent lawyer asks court to bar video evidence in murder case (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2017 OP
I dont think the videos should be barred. cstanleytech Mar 2017 #1
Well, if Rodriguez threw rocks over a fence... Orrex Mar 2017 #2
So the agency was in possession of a video... PoiBoy Mar 2017 #3
Yes, I wish to know just why the agency didn't Sorceress Mar 2017 #4

cstanleytech

(26,284 posts)
1. I dont think the videos should be barred.
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 11:34 AM
Mar 2017

The defense should be given the time and resources to investigate where if in any places said video is inaccurate but alot of the evidence on the video should still be intact more than enough to allow its use by the prosecution.

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
2. Well, if Rodriguez threw rocks over a fence...
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 11:48 AM
Mar 2017

I can certainly see why the brave Swartz felt compelled to fire randomly through the fence in response.

I mean, what else could he do in that case except try to murder a child?

PoiBoy

(1,542 posts)
3. So the agency was in possession of a video...
Tue Mar 21, 2017, 07:47 PM
Mar 2017

showing an officer involved shooting and they "didn't hold onto original copies of the footage"..?

WTF..?

I thought it was protocol to preserve any and all evidence in a case like this... pretty clever to make copies, destroy the original, hand over copies to the Plaintiff, then claim that the copies are “highly compressed and deeply flawed.”






Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Border agent lawyer asks ...