Manning’s Conviction Seen as Making Prosecution of WikiLeaks’ Assange Likely
Source: Washington Post
By Billy Kenber, Published: July 30 E-mail the writer
The conviction of Army private Bradley Manning on espionage charges Tuesday makes it increasingly likely that the United States will prosecute WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as a co-conspirator, according to his attorney and civil liberties groups.
Judge Denise Lind, an Army colonel, found Manning guilty of several violations of the Espionage Act, and he could face life in prison. Press freedom advocates said the verdict adds to their alarm that the Obama administrations aggressive pursuit of leakers will discourage whistleblowers from providing critical information on military and intelligence matters.
- snip -
Military prosecutors in the court-martial portrayed Assange as an information anarchist who encouraged Manning to leak hundreds of thousands of classified military and diplomatic documents. And they insisted that the anti-secrecy group cannot be considered a media organization that published the leaked information in the public interest.
Defense attorneys denied the claim that Bradley Manning was acting under the direction of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, but the government kept trying to bring that up, trying to essentially say that Julian was a co-conspirator, said Michael Ratner, Assanges American attorney and the president emeritus of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York. Thats a very bad sign about what the U.S. government wants to do to Julian Assange.
A grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks is ongoing, according to a spokesman for the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. But it is unclear whether any sealed indictments exist or whether Assange has been charged.
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mannings-conviction-seen-as-making-prosecution-of-wikileaks-assange-likely/2013/07/30/79746700-f94f-11e2-afc1-c850c6ee5af8_story.html
leveymg
(36,418 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Under what authority?
What law?
How does the US government prosecute a foreign national for violating its laws?
If they can do this, then what the fuck are we pretending at here?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Julian Assange you are charged with Living too close to Harrods or anything of a similar nature from Monty Python.
Wikileaks didn't steal the info : they published it.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)In my case the Guardian had come to mind because they initially republished the leaks.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)They wanted a conviction and they got one. Assange maybe out of hot water in terms of the US charges. Now he can sit back and continue to criticize the United States while Manning takes the fall.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Face up to the sexual assault charges or keep hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I'm sure you'll get a vulgar response you get to that one. I think no matter what he'll be in the Ecuadorian Embassy for awhile.
Swagman
(1,934 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)snot
(10,529 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)ConcernedCanuk
(13,509 posts).
.
.
Like that's gonna go over real well, sooner or later,
The masses will revolt methinks, not soon,
But it always happens when governments get too iron-fisted.
Stop, or at least reduce this on-going war-machine,
help out it's own citizens instead of spending trillions to bomb and occupy other countries,
USA may survive as "united".
USSR was iron-fisted.
Didn't end well.
CC