Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 04:16 AM Jul 2013

Manning’s Conviction Seen as Making Prosecution of WikiLeaks’ Assange Likely

Source: Washington Post

By Billy Kenber, Published: July 30 E-mail the writer
The conviction of Army private Bradley Manning on espionage charges Tuesday makes it increasingly likely that the United States will prosecute WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as a co-conspirator, according to his attorney and civil liberties groups.

Judge Denise Lind, an Army colonel, found Manning guilty of several violations of the Espionage Act, and he could face life in prison. Press freedom advocates said the verdict adds to their alarm that the Obama administration’s aggressive pursuit of leakers will discourage whistleblowers from providing critical information on military and intelligence matters.

- snip -

Military prosecutors in the court-martial portrayed Assange as an “information anarchist” who encouraged Manning to leak hundreds of thousands of classified military and diplomatic documents. And they insisted that the anti-secrecy group cannot be considered a media organization that published the leaked information in the public interest.

Defense attorneys denied “the claim that Bradley Manning was acting under the direction of WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, but the government kept trying to bring that up, trying to essentially say that Julian was a co-conspirator,” said Michael Ratner, Assange’s American attorney and the president emeritus of the Center for Constitutional Rights in New York. “That’s a very bad sign about what the U.S. government wants to do to Julian Assange.”

A grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks is ongoing, according to a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. But it is unclear whether any sealed indictments exist or whether Assange has been charged.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mannings-conviction-seen-as-making-prosecution-of-wikileaks-assange-likely/2013/07/30/79746700-f94f-11e2-afc1-c850c6ee5af8_story.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manning’s Conviction Seen as Making Prosecution of WikiLeaks’ Assange Likely (Original Post) Hissyspit Jul 2013 OP
Weren't the deniers claiming the US Gov't "has no interest" in prosecuting Assange? leveymg Jul 2013 #1
Who is going to prosecute him? The US? DeSwiss Jul 2013 #2
They'll think of something suitable to fit him up. dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #3
Note this part BainsBane Jul 2013 #4
Fair comparison / illustration. dipsydoodle Jul 2013 #5
That seems reasonable to me davidpdx Jul 2013 #6
He's got two choices BainsBane Jul 2013 #7
Well I only vaguely alluded to that on purpose davidpdx Jul 2013 #8
as can everyone who published the material including DU Swagman Jul 2013 #9
What are you babbling about? davidpdx Jul 2013 #10
Thanks for the info, Hissy. snot Jul 2013 #11
now they should release him. He's been punished enough with 'time served' Sunlei Jul 2013 #12
Keep trying to stifle the "peasants" ConcernedCanuk Jul 2013 #13

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. Weren't the deniers claiming the US Gov't "has no interest" in prosecuting Assange?
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 04:24 AM
Jul 2013
A grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks is ongoing, according to a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.
 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
2. Who is going to prosecute him? The US?
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 04:25 AM
Jul 2013

Under what authority?

What law?

How does the US government prosecute a foreign national for violating its laws?

If they can do this, then what the fuck are we pretending at here?

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
3. They'll think of something suitable to fit him up.
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 04:50 AM
Jul 2013

Julian Assange you are charged with Living too close to Harrods or anything of a similar nature from Monty Python.

Wikileaks didn't steal the info : they published it.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
4. Note this part
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 05:09 AM
Jul 2013
Trevor Timm, executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, agreed that Manning’s conviction on espionage charges brought Assange “one step closer” to being prosecuted. But he added that “charging a publisher of information under the Espionage Act would be completely unprecedented and put every decent national security reporter in America at risk of jail, because they also regularly publish national security information.”

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
5. Fair comparison / illustration.
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 05:16 AM
Jul 2013

In my case the Guardian had come to mind because they initially republished the leaks.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
6. That seems reasonable to me
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 05:43 AM
Jul 2013

They wanted a conviction and they got one. Assange maybe out of hot water in terms of the US charges. Now he can sit back and continue to criticize the United States while Manning takes the fall.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
7. He's got two choices
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 05:46 AM
Jul 2013

Face up to the sexual assault charges or keep hiding in the Ecuadorian embassy.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
8. Well I only vaguely alluded to that on purpose
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 05:57 AM
Jul 2013

I'm sure you'll get a vulgar response you get to that one. I think no matter what he'll be in the Ecuadorian Embassy for awhile.

 

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)
13. Keep trying to stifle the "peasants"
Wed Jul 31, 2013, 05:10 PM
Jul 2013

.
.
.

Like that's gonna go over real well, sooner or later,

The masses will revolt methinks, not soon,

But it always happens when governments get too iron-fisted.

Stop, or at least reduce this on-going war-machine,

help out it's own citizens instead of spending trillions to bomb and occupy other countries,

USA may survive as "united".

USSR was iron-fisted.

Didn't end well.

CC

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Manning’s Conviction Seen...