New Snowden Leak Upstages U.S. Move to Declassify Documents
Source: Reuters
New Snowden leak upstages U.S. move to declassify documents
By Alina Selyukh and Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON | Wed Jul 31, 2013 3:50pm EDT
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New revelations from former security contractor Edward Snowden that U.S. intelligence agencies have access to a vast online tracking tool came to light on Wednesday as lawmakers put the secret surveillance programs under greater scrutiny.
The Guardian, citing documents from Snowden, published National Security Agency training materials for the XKeyscore program, which the newspaper described as the NSA's widest-reaching system that covers "nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet."
Intelligence analysts can conduct surveillance through XKeyscore by filling in an on-screen form giving only a "broad justification" for the search and no review by a court or NSA staff, the Guardian said.
Snowden's revelations to media that U.S. intelligence agencies collected data on phone calls and other communications of Americans and foreign citizens as a tool to fight terrorism have sparked uproar in the United States and abroad.
Intelligence officials say the programs helped thwart terrorist attacks.
"The implication that NSA's collection is arbitrary and unconstrained is false," the agency said in a statement in response to the Guardian's new report, calling XKeyscore part of "NSA's lawful foreign signals intelligence collection system."
Lawmakers have called for greater oversight of the vast surveillance system, which expanded rapidly after the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE96U03320130731
Vietnameravet
(1,085 posts)or do more harm? Well then let the Russians keep their word and ship him back...
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Vietnameravet
(1,085 posts)deurbano
(2,895 posts)<<The Guardian, citing documents from Snowden, published National Security Agency training materials for the XKeyscore program, which the newspaper described as the NSA's widest-reaching system that covers "nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet.">>
Snowden already gave the Guardian the documents. The paper has been gradually reviewing them and analyzing them before deciding on what to publish.
SeattleVet
(5,477 posts)and it's taking time to go through them, vet them, and whatever before he publishes them. Essentially, these documents have already been released, but the claim is that he has a LOT more that has not been sent to any outlets.
pscot
(21,024 posts)except to the careerist fear mongers who are getting rich off the surveillance state?
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)On the subject of Snowden he'd already handed that information over - the fact it has only just been published is incidental.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)QuestForSense
(653 posts)I agree, but while all eyes are 'focused' on Snowden, a lot of things swirl around the periphery, unnoticed. For instance, I've read a few things about Sabrina De Sousa, a former CIA officer, a big story which lasted about half a day before disappearing. And there is also Robert Seldon Lady, another former CIA agent who, ironically, is like a 'reverse' Edward Snowden. Tom Engelhardt's article on Lady is still up on Salon (see http://www.salon.com/2013/07/29/u_s_chased_down_snowden_but_let_cia_operative_robert_seldon_lady_disappear_partner/), but I think a lot of stories which might give people a sense of perspective are allowed to die so stories like Snowden's can blossom and take on a life of their own. The facts recede and people's reactions actually 'become' the story. It's a great formula because it works like a charm, but the new story is still only a lie. Why do the citizens not want him to expose what he knows? I think maybe a lot of people prefer the comfort of a lie. He exposed the truth, and only the truth hurts.
mallard
(569 posts)... make life hard on their American friends. They don't want to be an enemy.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And the notion downthread that "he (Snowden) might not have done it" is absurd on its face. He's the one who has asserted that HE has positive control over the documents, and that even torture couldn't get them from him.
I think Snowden fucked himself. If Putin wants to resolve this with little or no damage to himself, Snowden just gave him an "out" to so do. Plus, the US government would be in Pootie's "debt," another thing Pootie likes....
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Civilization2
(649 posts)It is not so much what they SAY they use all this scraped info for,. it is how easy it is for contractors or anyone with "access" to dig dirt on anyone they need to destroy, political foes say,. . a system with this much information cross-linked and historically archived will make it trivial to destroy/control any opponent, or opposition. The new corporate-military state will be all knowing and all powerful,. all opposition will be quashed. Welcome to the new world order they have promised, the military empire has a secret intelligence empire big brother to keep it protected, and the people can eat cake.
Silly proles. Know your place, and let the 1% run the ship of empire.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)He's analyzing the stuff before it comes out, making sure there are no mistakes in the stories, spreading it around the world, the feed rate is keeping it in the public eye, and the revelations seem to be getting more depth as time goes on.
It's a textbook lesson in high-impact journalism. Nice job, Glenn!