Anti-Hillary Clinton Buttons Reportedly At California GOP Convention Are Just Disgusting
Source: Huffington Post
The anti-Hillary Clinton buttons that were reportedly spotted at a California Republican Party convention are quite simply offensive and disgusting. San Francisco Chronicle's Carla Marinucci tweeted the following image Saturday:
Popular buttons at @CAGOP convention already take on @hillaryclinton #2016 in a big way... Ouch!!
https://twitter.com/cmarinucci/statuses/386669291954655233
When questioned about the validity of the photo, Marinucci provided more details, tweeting that they were spotted outside of a VIP reception area, and later appeared to have been removed.
The three-day convention focused attention on recruiting new Republican voters, specifically women, the Associated Press reported. If these buttons were really at the convention, they probably did not help that effort.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/05/hillary-clinton-buttons_n_4051545.html
The Party Of Women.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)underpants
(182,848 posts)calimary
(81,383 posts)"Stay classy, shitstain!" LOVE IT!!!!! And it's WELL-deserved!!!!
Although unfortunately it IS an insult to shitstains everywhere...
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)And people who object:
- Can't take a "joke"
- Can't handle the "truth"
- Can be called any number of misspelled names
warrant46
(2,205 posts)This classy Pre TeaParty scum and John Kerry's purple heart
These people are Scum Bags
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)Any women who are so addled and so confused about their own best interests that they could still consider voting Republican would be just fine with that button.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)(Our band had a gig there..I didn't like it) ...anyway...the dude was young and HAD to be a "crasher".
His pin said: After reading your button, I see you're the dumbest M.F. in the room"
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Dopes that they are.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)no rampant misogyny -- even on DU -- will prevent that outcome.
(And, those buttons just highlight the emotional immaturity maturity of many right wing Republicans.)
trumad
(41,692 posts)Nah just a few knuckle draggers who get taken care of pretty quick here at DU.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)to which I refer is that evidenced by the rabid right wing Republicans who've distributed those offensive buttons.
BluegrassStateBlues
(881 posts)Presidents in the U.S. are not selected by this mysterious TPTB you reference.
Demit
(11,238 posts)And then, of course, you're absolutely right! The electorate gets to choose between them.
brooklynite
(94,657 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)about TPTB, Blue. If you're trying to imply some grand conspiracy theory, you are being snarky and/or disingenuous. If you don't understand that the corporate megalomaniacs -- who've usurped our media, our politics and our global economy -- use their inordinate wealth and power to 'control' public opinion and determine who are the 'primary' candidates that will vie for POTUS, then you are not paying attention.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Who we get to choose between is already pretty much decided by the time half the country gets to vote in primaries. The whole damn system is set up from beginning to end. And if the Republicans don't like the outcome of an election? Well, we saw what happened in 2000, didn't we?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)sick.
askeptic
(478 posts)I'm surprised this even made the news - just serves to rankle feathers for no good reason. I've seen (and wore) buttons that have disrespected key Republicans in similar ways. These are calculated to piss off those who disagree...
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I've said some things I wouldn't want recorded in my day, as well.
But, it is the shear overpowering weight of bile, hatred, ignorance and racism found in the right that is the issue.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,020 posts)ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Surely the buttons you reference that were worn by Democrats can be found online. A picture of one would be appreciated.
Laelth
(32,017 posts)-Laelth
MiniMe
(21,718 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)except God forbid you ever insult a woman on her looks. That's what men are for.
Betcha it was KFC made 'em take 'em down, not Republican women, who probably thought it up in the first place.
OmahaBlueDog
(10,000 posts)If it's about your opponents, it's funny; if it's about your candidate, it's disgusting.
JimboBillyBubbaBob
(1,389 posts)I like nothing more than using some quip about the right wing. It sticks in the head longer.
7962
(11,841 posts)Not to mention the cartoons, photoshops, etc.
I want my team to win, but i dont want them to sign the best QB in history if he's a wife beater
Turborama
(22,109 posts)And what have you seen here that's "a LOT worse here on most any thread"?
7962
(11,841 posts)How many times have there been people wishing for dick cheneys heart to explode? Or death wished upon other people with whom we dont agree? As for the photoshops, what I'm referring to are obvious jokes, not something meant to be taken seriously.
Here's another thread for you just from today: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023800139 Any need for that?
If I knew how to search the site for pics, etc, I would. Unfortunately I'm computer-challenged.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)is sooooooooooooo negative towards women, ugh
dotymed
(5,610 posts)another "lesser of two evils", corporatist election.
I do think that these buttons were over the top and reflect a sick mentality.
Using someone's appearance as a basis to judge them?
Liberalism= communism ?
I find this idiotic.
However, unless we can get money out of politics why should these people take politics seriously?
We need the 99% represented, not more corporate representation.
R Merm
(406 posts)Attractive, callous and stupid
Oh and you can include Renee Ellmers in that description.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)even stupider.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)for that end of our political spectrum. Are there no grownups anywhere in that damn party of idiots and inflammatory extremists?
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Response to onehandle (Original post)
sonibeth This message was self-deleted by its author.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)n/t
sonibeth
(21 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)They only care about insulting her as a woman. They are sexist goons.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)This kind of stuff will only hurt them with women voters. Dumb.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)oh the same thing wrong with small dicks. ahem sorry I like breasts big or small. oh and these showed up in the month of October very classy
Beacool
(30,250 posts)But that fact would go against their "witty" attempt to demean her as a woman.
hue
(4,949 posts)seabeckind
(1,957 posts)what if the whole intent of the button is to elicit the response it is currently getting?
It does 2 things...enflames their base...and forces a reaction on our part. It helps to drive us to Hillary.
Perhaps that is the intent?
Prior to the nominations, the candidates are blessed by the PRICs (People Really in Charge). They get to sit there and watch the election without a care in the world. They don't care whether a D or an R wins cause they've bet on both. And gotten odds in their favor on both.
Every candidate for the people is usually eliminated long before the convention.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)full of right wings and ass holes.
KaryninMiami
(3,073 posts)Prepare for an ugly and disgusting fight. The GOPigs have been storing up piles of ammunition to defeat Hillary since 2008. Remember how ruthless they were to Pres. Clinton and to them both during those years? Now add in desperation to win back the White House and the panic of having no candidate of their own to run that can beat her. Fasten your seat belts- we are in for quite a ride once she throws in her hat. They will stop at nothing!
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)With PBO, they will show us all what they really think of women.
Cha
(297,436 posts)tosh
(4,424 posts)This pre-adolescent bully crap is ALL THEY HAVE.
7962
(11,841 posts)And some here may not want her, from comments I've read. But the fact today is that there is no one who can beat her on either side, who has shown any inclination to run.
Go ahead, throw a few names out there just for fun.
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)she wins the nomination. Might as well have a Rethug in there; same thing.
I wish Howard Dean would run again. Or Elizabeth Warren. Or Dennis Kucinich. Or Alan Grayson. I'd vote for any of them. Or even Ralph Nader.
7962
(11,841 posts)Which is my whole point. On the GOP side, ??. Christie? The Tea Party doesnt like him and would block him. The GOP cant get out of their own way. I have a few friends that I CAN discuss opposition politics with, and I always hear "The GOP keeps losing because we dont run candidates that are conservative enough".
After I stop laughing, I tell them go ahead, run Rand Paul or Ted Cruz or Sarah Palin. Then after he/she gets crushed in the election, what will be the excuse then?
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Think again, brother. We've put up with the right wing "liberals" for long enough. It's time to take a stand and run people who stand for OUR principles, not reasonable facsimiles. I'm sick of it. So should you be.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)The RW is far more frightening than any nominee the Democrats may elect.
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Sorry, not voting for Hillary.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)And, fortunately, a lot of other people feel as I do. YOU go ahead and elect your corporatist, and we'll hear you complaining for the next four years.
YOU go ahead and fool yourself thinking that it's Hillary or nothing. Not all of us are buying it.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)And here I thought you were trying to coerce me into voting for your favorite corporatist by pushing an either/or (the "or" being that I would have to settle for a Rethug as president) choice on me! And that's even BEFORE the nominations (which, as I'm sure you will recall, your corporatist candidate LOST the last time)!
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)These people never mentally got beyond 12.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)(woman are livestock) it to your face are two different things. The Extremist Religious part of the GOP is telling its women that liberal women and women and girls in general, may be rebuked by GOP men in the name of God and according to the Bible. So GOP Women should just look the other way, After all, the Black (turned down) Star is the star of GOP Women, equal to the two other down-turned stars on the elephant. In past days, in the days of Babel and Star worship, Saturnist were intelligent, old, boring, ignored Women.
Saturn is a very white planet second to stature of Jupiter. The Black Star must be a side star on the back of the Elephant. Livestock is bought and breed for physical and genetic charateristics with which to enrich yourself with or for enjoyment.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/20/1122097/-Clayton-Williams-Victims-of-Rape-Should-Relax-and-Enjoy-It
RVN VET
(492 posts)But they apparently were not for sale inside the convention, so it looks as if they did not then and do not now carry the Party's official seal of approval.
But whether it's an "official" Republican "statement" or not, the GOP is much more prone to vile, even ugly, statements about women than is the Dem Party. Remember when that that large tub of lard, John Sensenbrenner, made a public statement about Michele Obama's butt? He apologized for it, but only after it became apparent that it was politically damaging to him.
riversedge
(70,264 posts)only get worse as time goes on. Darrell Issa is leading the hate wolf pack.
OldRedneck
(1,397 posts)I'll probably be arrested for assault.
But it will FEEL GOOD!!!!
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)If any of these people had any self-awareness, they should have shamed the vendor into taking them down. But, this is the logical outcome of a party that's marinated in the likes of Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Breitbart for the past 30 years.
gopiscrap
(23,762 posts)gopiscrap
(23,762 posts)can you imagine the shit storm if something like this referring to a possible republican presidential candidate appeared at a Democratic state convention?
gtar100
(4,192 posts)of any truth. They love insulting anything their little minds cannot understand. Couldn't possibly win an argument on logic or facts so they stoop to this. Their appeal is to the worst parts of human nature. They are pathetic.
BBbats
(89 posts)That Hilary joke is old.
procon
(15,805 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)mysuzuki2
(3,521 posts)Hillary may well have the last laugh.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)I'm not a fan of Clinton, but those buttons are absolutely disgusting.
Gothmog
(145,427 posts)I have my own button machine and make some buttons for my friends. I saw some really nasty anti-Obama buttons on cafepress and some other sites.
NickB79
(19,257 posts)GOP Supporter 1: "How can we get more women to vote for us in the future?"
GOP Supporter 2: "Let's make bad jokes about their tits and thighs, chicks love that shit!"
Tea Party Supporter chimes in: "We have the old white man demographic locked up tight, what more do we need?"
yurbud
(39,405 posts)are worthless.
2. If Hillary does get the nomination, I hope she wins, so all these knuckledraggers look impotent with their namecalling.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)CBHagman
(16,987 posts)...they just want to get along in bipartisan comity with Democrats.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Any Democratic candidate will to some extent. But Hillary's personality, voice, etc. are not what we need.
Bill was the personable one. I suspect that if you know Hillary on a personal level, you really like her, but like Nixon, she just doesn't project well in a large-group dynamic.
There just are many people like that.
She comes across as super-smart but very aware of that fact. Her voice is hard and not musical. It does not reflect openness to others or warmth. She could change that.
She has done a lot with picking colors. She is dressing much better than she did in her earlier years, but she needs a new Hillary. And I just don't know personally think she is electable. It is very easy to focus on her bad traits. She should, in my opinion, stick to a supporting role. She is talented, intelligent, etc. But as president or as a candidate for president, I don't think so.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)You repeatedly say that Hillary is not personable, that leads me to think that you have never met her. As for not projecting well, if she does run again, go to one of her rallies and see how she projects.
Your comments are superficial. I gather that you're a woman, which makes your criticism of her voice and choice of colors (????) even more disappointing.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)for hours and hours and hours and work on presentation. It makes a huge difference.
Obama is the master of it. Romney was loser. McCain was worse.
Hillary was very well qualified for the presidency in 2008 if you just looked at her resume. She did not get the nomination because of her presentation and her excessive affiliations with the 1% and corporate America.
People did not realize that Obama had sold out to the banks.
I like Obama and have worked hard to get him elected and re-elected, but I really want to see a candidate in our party who is not a sell-out and who, at the same time, has charisma. I don't think Hillary is that candidate.
If Hillary had sufficient charisma, she would have been elected in 2008. I hope I'm wrong because it looks like she has the Democratic machine behind her, but I think she is the wrong choice and would be a big mistake.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)But you have Warren in your sig as your 2016 choice. If you're soooo concerned about charisma, then she's definitely not the right candidate. I have a lot of respect for Elizabeth Warren, but charismatic she's not.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)except as grunts/pawns for Big Oil/the MIC, the contractors, et cetra.
And don't DARE let the Vets ask for much when they get back home. Damn socialist teet sucking freeloafers.
Cha
(297,436 posts)they?
cristianmarie533
(51 posts)The GOP are a bunch of imbeciles. I hope Hilary wins by a landslide in '16.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)When Bill Clinton ran for President and defeated President Bush (the only real President Bush), the Republicans threw more vitriol as Hillary than at Bill. Why did Hillary work as a high power attorney when she had a little girl at home? Why did the Clintons have only one child? In the context of the culture wars (1992 was the same year Pat Buchanan made his horribly divisive speech at the the GOP convention), this was an attack on working women, and the Republicans have not recovered the women's vote since and are now doing even more to alienate women voters.
The Republicans have turned into a irrational group of misogynists. It isn't that they haven't learned anything since 1992, they are incapable of learning anything. It's no wonder that they think the only way they can win elections is to suppress the vote.
liberal N proud
(60,338 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)Blue Owl
(50,454 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)It's the smell of Republican FEAR...
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Since Hillary has been in the national scene they have been attacking her womanhood. They should at least come up with a new pin, that one has been around since the 90s.
They never attack her brains because they can't. So they attack her femininity.
1) She's a lesbian. There is zero proof, but who cares?
2) She's not attractive enough. I beg to differ, either way, it shouldn't matter.
3) Her husband cheated on her. How can she possibly run the WH if she can't control her man?
BTW, the last one I've read right here on DU. So it's not just the loony Right who froths at the mouth every time they hear the name Clinton.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)this coming from the Goodball Oafish Peanuts
KareBear
(192 posts)Origin of the "joke"
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/special.asp
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts).
4dsc
(5,787 posts)in order to talk to their base the GOP will stop at nothing.
hamsterjill
(15,223 posts)I love it!
The more fear they have, the uglier they act. This is pretty ugly!
sandyj999
(1,628 posts)When did we ever think they had any decency?
Gothmog
(145,427 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)I liked this response: Better 2 small breasts than a whole party of huge asses.
BTW, the small breasts part is inaccurate, but since when does the RW care about facts?
moriah
(8,311 posts)M.G.
(250 posts)Honestly, I've heard much more overt sexism in casual conversation with educated Republicans than overt racism against Obama. I think Republicans, or at least the more educated ones, have more fully internalized taboos against racism than sexism. I've heard Hillary described as a "wrinkled b----" and worse over otherwise friendly meals.