Obama Campaign Manager In Talks To Head Hillary Clinton Project
Source: BuzzFeed
Three sources with knowledge of the plans said Messina, an Obama insider who ran the presidents campaign last year, and Podesta, a longtime advisor to Bill Clinton, are in discussions to join the board of Priorities USA, the multimillion-dollar super PAC that backed President Obamas reelection effort last year.
The men would chair a board of former elected officials and donors who would announce their support for Clintons possible White House bid in 2016. Messinas presence, in particular, would signal that key Obama loyalists have lined up behind Clinton and are ready to essentially forgo a primary.
But those close to the group, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, warned that the talks are still in progress and that the eventual outcome of the PACs Phase Two plan is still fluid and subject to change. One open question surrounds Vice President Joe Biden, who some worry would view Messinas move to a pro-Clinton venture as a slight, sources said, explaining that Biden is one of several considerations still holding up the PAC from moving forward.
Read more: Link to source
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)...you should get organized and make a serious effort to encourage an acceptable liberal to run? Seems to be what the Hillary supporters are doing.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)But you knew that, didn't you?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
brooklynite
(94,594 posts)...are you going to actually DO anything to convince Warren to change her mind, or just sit and hope?
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Divernan
(15,480 posts)As John Maynard Keynes noted many, many years ago:
When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
pa28
(6,145 posts)OK.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Poor Joe Biden and I mean "poor" in the literal sense - the Clintons have more money than god. Biden is incredibly poor compared to the vast majority of Senators/Governors, etc. A lifetime of HONEST public service doesn't pay well. I've heard politicians ridicule their honest colleagues for failing to pile up personal fortunes: "Those idiots don't know how the game is played."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-502163_162-4445194-502163.html
The Obama campaign released 10 years of Sen. Joe Biden's tax returns today. You can see them here. As the returns show, Biden makes a relatively modest income compared to his Senate colleagues.
There are a few reasons for this: Neither Biden nor his wife, Jill, with whom he filed jointly, have enormous personal wealth. Jill is a teacher not a high-paying job. And Biden has been in the Senate for almost his entire working career, unlike many of his colleagues who have worked in the private sector for a larger paycheck.
Joint income between Biden and his wife Jill rose from $215,000 to $249,000 between 1998 and 2006. These numbers reflect the total of Joe Biden's Senate salary, his Widener University School of Law teaching salary, and Jill Biden's teaching salary.
The Bidens make almost no money each year from dividends or interest. They deduct only state/local taxes, mortgage interest and what he donates to charity. 2003 was the last year they claimed a dependent child -- their daughter, Ashley.
By the starkest of contrasts, we have the wheelin', dealin' Big Dog - with no inherited wealth and no lucrative profession/businesses prior to holding elected office, Bill Clinton has socked enough sweet deals away since leaving the Oval office to have accumulated more than $50 million in personal wealth. He is now the wealthiest living American president/ex-president - eat your hearts out Bushes. It's the One Percent Way!
warrant46
(2,205 posts)I guess there will be no primaries ?
Divernan
(15,480 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)LOL
Divernan
(15,480 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)So they are already teaming up to stop Warren and prevent 'actual change'. These carpetbaggers need to be stopped. They are acting like a gang and all they do is keep the wars going, the common people in prison and the bankers and financial elites free to do as they please. I know, I know they have made a few positive tweaks to the system but cmon...lets be real. The one bone they tossed us??? A republican modeled health plan. Wow. Thanks.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Here's the latest article on her not wanting to run:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/30/elizabeth-warren-president_n_4016319.html
Says IF Hillary doesn't run, she may change her mind. And you may want to look up what carpetbaggers means because you're definitely using it incorrectly.
I know about actual carpetbaggers and scalawags but I felt the same kind of exploitation happening. I'm sure Warren is afraid to run against Clinton but its just too obvious that Clinton represents the 1% as much as a Democrat can.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)wants the headache. I can't imagine wanting to be President so I have no trouble believing people when they say they're not interested. I would love her as a candidate (although I think she would lose nationally) but I just don't think it's in the cards.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)They never thought Obama could win either. Someone needs to cause the right wing hate machine extreme embarrassment.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and governs as a moderate. Sen Warren couldn't credibly do that because it's not in her soul.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Obama ran as a moderate DEMOCRAT...not a moderate republican which is how he governs although labels don't do description justice because there are many conflicting details. Obama ran as pro-transparency, anti-lobbyists, antiwar and anti- surveillance as well as pro civil rights. All I see now are tons of lobbyists, tons of secrets and suppression of civil rights. The things Warren is liberal on most common people agree with. I'm sure she can steer clear if divisive cultural issues and focus on economic justice.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I don't honestly think Biden will run and I don't think Warren will either.
It's clear the backroom deals are being used by those that are pushing Clinton's nomination. I'm not surprised at Podesta, but that Messina is going to do that this early surprises me.
I've had some private conversations with other DUers about this as well. I'm beginning to change my opinion about starting to recruit someone now. The more I see this, the more I think the party is getting railroaded.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)after billy throwing obama under the bus the clinton`s can go back to where they came from.
groundloop
(11,519 posts)Nothing in life is perfect, we'll just have to settle for the best we can get. If Hillary is the nominee I'll support her just as I did President Obama. Ditto if Elizabeth Warren by chance changes her mind and gets the nod.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I've been very resistant toward doing so, but it appears if we don't we may have no choice.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Let's hope it does not come to Hillary as the DLC Dem candidate.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)tridim
(45,358 posts)Nearly every day my support for the Clintons diminishes, because of the Clintons.
bobGandolf
(871 posts)We really need to make progress there.
RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)brooklynite
(94,594 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)brooklynite
(94,594 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)Thank god it passed,eh?