Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:03 PM Apr 2014

Appeals court reverses hacker/troll “weev” conviction and sentence

Source: ARS Technica

A federal appeals court Friday reversed and vacated the conviction and sentence of hacker and Internet troll Andrew "weev" Auernheimer.

The case against Auernheimer, who has often been in solitary confinement for obtaining and disclosing personal data of about 140,000 iPad owners from a publicly available AT&T website, was seen as a test case on how far the authorities could go under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the same law that federal prosecutors were invoking against Aaron Swartz.

But in the end, the Third US Circuit Court of Appeals didn't squarely address the controversial fraud law and instead said Auernheimer was charged in the wrong federal court.

"Although this appeal raises a number of complex and novel issues that are of great public importance in our increasingly interconnected age, we find it necessary to reach only one that has been fundamental since our country’s founding: venue," the appeals court wrote. "The proper place of colonial trials was so important to the founding generation that it was listed as a grievance in the Declaration of Independence" (PDF).

Read more: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/04/appeals-court-reverses-hackertroll-weev-conviction-and-sentence/



Version of the story from The Guardian:
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/apr/11/andrew-auernheimers-weev-conviction-vacated-hacking
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appeals court reverses hacker/troll “weev” conviction and sentence (Original Post) PoliticAverse Apr 2014 OP
What's with the solitary confinement? Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #1
See... PoliticAverse Apr 2014 #2
This is so lame. Jesus Malverde Apr 2014 #3
Interesting in that the Declaration was used as a legal source rather than the Constitution. Does 24601 Apr 2014 #4

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
3. This is so lame.
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 07:03 PM
Apr 2014

As I understand it, he used AT&T functionality to get the info.

Didn't HACK anything as it was already exposed, and basically used a script to gather already public info. What was disturbing was that AT&T had built their system so poorly. Then pretended that the info would have been safe had they not been "hacked".

I think the analogy is to write a script that harvests DU profiles, by incrementing the user ID URL in an automated fashion.

24601

(3,962 posts)
4. Interesting in that the Declaration was used as a legal source rather than the Constitution. Does
Fri Apr 11, 2014, 07:08 PM
Apr 2014

that mean courts can invalidate a law because it's un-Independent?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appeals court reverses ha...