Publisher reveals title for Hillary Clinton’s memoir
Source: Washington Post
NEW YORK -- Hillary Rodham Clinton’s forthcoming memoir of her four years as secretary of state will be titled “Hard Choices,” her publisher announced Friday morning.
Simon & Schuster, which is publishing the book due out June 10, also unveiled an image that appears to be the book’s cover: a closely cropped, black-and-white portrait of Clinton.
The book is being billed as Clinton’s “inside account of the crises, choices, and challenges that she faced during her four years as America’s 67th Secretary of State, and how those experiences drive her view of the future.”
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/04/18/publisher-reveals-title-for-hillary-clintons-memoir/
= new reply since forum marked as read
That's called a smile.
I've already seen two threads here, and several in other sites, asking whether Hillary would want to run for president now that she's about to become a grandmother. Has anyone in the history of the world ever asked a man that question???? How many grandkids does Romney have? There are more than two dozen of them and not once was he asked in 2012 whether being a grandfather would hinder his chances at the WH.
Their travels keep them apart, but when at home you can see them all over Chappaqua and NYC. They are out and about and will talk to anyone, particularly Bill. If they are home, you'll see them walking their dogs around town (he got a lab named Seamus and she a poodle named Tally). Sometimes Chelsea and her husband are with them and you can see them too. I have a friend who lives in their town. Over the years she has sent me many pics of them.
BTW, that meme of them not being together is a RW talking point.
about running is WAY beyond me!!! 
Oh, the difficulties of being a grandparent AND holding public office!!!!!
Why, Lawd-a-mercy, I just can't fathom how it can be done!!!!
The captions write themselves.
Obama: Oh, gee......he's back.
Clinton: I'm baaaccckkk. You miss me?
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members . It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
It must be someone who never ran a campaign. All things considered, the 2008 Democratic race was quite civilized.
I worked and now I'm home sipping an ice coffee before going to church for the Tenebrae services.
Yeah, the mean Clintons. Obama was just pure as the driven snow. He didn't play politics, no siree.
Please..........
They have years of working together on some of the work they have done. together 
There are more pics like that one. The Obamas dislike the Clintons so much that the president keeps in touch with both of them. He calls Bill once in a while and Hillary regularly. She also had lunch with him last summer.
Here, notice THIS:
I'll save you time--go to 1:10.
I think you need to retract your intemperate and inaccurate comments.
And also for straightening out that poster.
There are many other examples here and there--HRC and MRO have been together at a wide array of events, and they seem very comfortable with one another! I think MRO's words in that convention speech make the truth very clear.
My favorite is the one with the Obamas and Hillary in evening wear. They all look very elegant.
Response to Hekate (Reply #29)
Same old bitters. Life's too short to worry about them.
Evidently enlightenment comes more easily to some than others.
And no, Hillary didn't go to war with Iraq and Afghanistan, if that's where you were going with that comment. Bush was president.
Not a good title. First place my mind went was to whining Queen Ann.
Tough choices may have been better, although any title they pick is bound to be pretty sucky for that kind of self-promotional, prep for the run book.
Regardless, it's better to ignore him than add to his nonsense.
She was the only woman who sat on the board of directors in the mid 80s. She was asked by Sam Walton because the company was under pressure to have a woman in its board. The board only met 4 times a year. While there she pushed for environmental issues and for more inclusion of women in its management ranks, although it is true that she didn't push them to unionize. Look at the pic I posted, zero diversity. How much actual influence do you think she had as a young woman surrounded by men? She was put there as the token woman and she advocated for the things that were dearest to her, and that she thought she could get the company on board.
Fellow board members and company executives, who have not spoken publicly about her role at Wal-Mart, say Mrs. Clinton used her position to champion personal causes, like the need for more women in management and a comprehensive environmental program, despite being Wal-Mart’s only female director, the youngest and arguably the least experienced in business. On other topics, like Wal-Mart’s vehement anti-unionism, for example, she was largely silent, they said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/us/politics/20walmart.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
It's a nice pic.
