ACLU: Mich. law that bars Conyers from ballot unconstitutional
Source: Detroit News Washington Bureau
Group files challenge to voter registration rule for circulators
May 12, 2014 at 9:12 pm
Marisa Schultz
The American Civil Liberties Union filed suit Monday in federal court to argue U.S. Rep. John Conyers belongs on the Aug. 5 primary ballot because its unconstitutional for Michigan to require that petition collectors be registered voters.
The ACLU is suing on behalf of two of Conyers constituents, including Tiara Willis-Pittman, one of Conyers petition circulators whose signatures were tossed because she was deemed an unregistered voter at the time of collection ...
In the federal suit, the ACLU argues, in part, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a voter registration requirement in 1999 involving a nonpartisan ballot petition in Colorado and Michigan should not have a voter registration requirement for its circulators. In the 6-3 decision, the court said the requirement poses a burden on people getting on the ballot.
The ACLU said keeping Conyers off the ballot would hurt the other plaintiff, Ederl Edna Moore, 72, a registered voter from Detroit who worked on his first campaign in the 1960s and wants to vote for him in the primary ...
Read more: http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20140512/METRO/305120120/ACLU-Michigan-law-blocking-Conyers-from-primary-ballot-unconstitutional
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Cha
(297,323 posts)sheshe2
(83,791 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)Without organizations like the ACLU and EFF, this would be a very different country.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)what will happen
MADem
(135,425 posts)Never assume that ya don't have to do the work to get on the ballot; ya do. And always, ALWAYS have a comfortable margin of signatures.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)Response to struggle4progress (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Calista241
(5,586 posts)Isn't disqualifying your candidate's competition for technicality bullshit like this electioneering 101?
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)---and the "some people" are not necessarily the guy running against him. I suspect that the man running against him is being forced to do it. Just a hunch.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)I doubt that. People will do anything for power. I suspect we're seeing that trait rear itself in this race.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)There are many other qualified candidates that could add some new life to the position. I don't think the congressional seat were meant to be a lifetime job. It would be better to allow more citizens a chance at serving our country.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, struggle4progress.