Last Minute US Govt Claims Put Halt to Greenwald 'Bombshell'
Source: Common Dreams
Published on Tuesday, July 1, 2014 by Common Dreams
Last Minute US Govt Claims Put Halt to Greenwald 'Bombshell'
Journalist says his team is investigating objections raised
- Jon Queally, staff writer
At midday on Monday, journalist Glenn Greenwald announced that revelations he has termed among "the most important" to result from documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden would be published at midnight.
However, despite the growing anticipation on Monday and just hours prior to the expected publication, Greenwald went back to Twitter and announced:
Glenn Greenwald ✔ @ggreenwald
Follow
After 3 months working on our story, USG today suddenly began making new last-minute claims which we intend to investigate before publishing
9:32 PM - 30 Jun 2014
As of noon on Tuesday, the reporting was still not showing on The Intercept, the online outlet edited by Greenwald where much of his most recent reporting on the documents has appeared, and no additional updates on the status of the reporting were seen on Twitter.
In various venues in recent months, Greenwald has suggested that the most explosive 'bombshell' reporting based on the documents would come last and recently discussed how the focus of the reporting will reveal the specific individuals or kinds of people that the NSA is targeting inside the United States with its "collect it all" approach to digital surveillance.
Read more: http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/07/01-4
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)Been there, done that. Learned my lesson.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)Sounds like this will be pretty damaging.
I wonder how the pro-NSA DUers will react to it.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Boxes.
Pole dancer.
If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.
You want the terrorists to win.
We had to destroy the Bill of Rights in order to preserve it.
Ummm
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)It's starting to look like Al Capone's Vault over there.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)would stalling it do if its going to be so damning?
how would delaying the inevitable help the government?
just curious..
maybe a traitor lover like yourself can fill me in
(I don't really mean that last sentence, just thought id add something equally as outlandish as your last sentence to mine)..
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)I like mIKE 2!
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)He's kinda damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, with some around here.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Dayam, Glenn! Just 'leter rip!
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Greenwald's typically indecipherable tweet only suggests that "they" are, once again, failing to meet their deadline. "New Journalism" allows for that, donchaknow.
No worries though. Cryptome has promised to host ALL the Snowden documents "in July". John Young may be fucking nuts, but he is by no means a coward, nor a prevaricator.
Here's Young taking Greenwald, et al, down every peg supporting their grift:
... snip
We look forward to continuing to aid and abet release of carefully orchestrated disclosures of sensitive and classified material, even if poorly narrated and whispered to boost imaginative value. To wit, the Snowden documents along with protestations by USG so sweetly combined as sweetheart pacts.
... snip
Same as usual, strip the narrative, publish the images, that is the Snowden docs without the window dressing. While awaiting technical documents which have been almost completely lacking.
... snip
Subterfuge is obligatory on all sides. The Snowden media team has done a masterful decoy operation to allow for development of countermeasures under guidance of Snowden and technical and legal wizards.
Question will always remain if the team has been penetrated, once, twice, many times as potential rewards for betrayal increase. This too is considered in opsec planning and execution. Thus the compartmentation of the documents, not only the Snowden media team we know, but by the others we don't, established before and after the team we know.
BumRushDaShow
(129,025 posts)Historic NY
(37,449 posts)if it were so, instead of three interconnected websites & blogs. There isn't a peep out there????
gvstn
(2,805 posts)And you are multibillion dollar companies which fear regulation then you don't report it. MSM will only report stories that are already out there and after they get the proper spin that doesn't address the core accusation against government malfeasance but revolves around discussing whether or not a whistleblower is a traitor or not.
Ask Verizon, Comcast, Google or Yahoo which secretly gave the NSA access to or internet activity. You could ask Qwest but they didn't listen and now they don't exist.
Maybe someone can remind me but was WAPO given access early on? I know The Guardian took the lead but think WAPO might have either done a vague article or turned down the story all together.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)The MSM that black lists everyone to the Left of Joe Scarborough? The MSM that focuses only on personal allegations about Assange, Snowden and Greenwald but never on what they reveal? THAT MSM?
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Fitzmas.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)nt
Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)or Glenn Beck's 2013 "system-toppling big reveal coming in 24 hours"
CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)The kind that allows for re-writes when new information comes to fore. It is also one of the great new advantages of the internet news medium. Last minute changes can be made without financial disaster (like the infamous "DEWEY WON!" .
On the downside, while we're sitting patiently waiting for THE TRUTH, we have to listen to all the anti-democratic yammering from the 'barely liberal' who would prefer we get our news from the establishment press where they are still comfortable...and there are no independent radical thinkers/writers.
.