Washington Post Editorial Section To Ban 'Redskins'
Source: TPM
The Washington Post's editorial section on Friday joined the ongoing media protest of the Washington Redskins' incendiary name.
The Post's editorial writers made it clear that the policy is "only for editorials" and the change won't apply to reporters who cover sports and news. That isn't quite as far-reaching as the policy instituted earlier this summer by the Seattle Times, which barred the team's name from appearing in its print and online editions.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/washington-post-editorial-section-bans-redskins
Well, it's a start, though it would really send a message to Dim Snyder if the entire paper stopped using the name of its home team.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)would be to simply stop reporting on them entirely, as long as the team's name remains the same.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)But if they were referred to solely as the Washington team on the sports pages, that would send a message.
You're still reporting the scores as news, but you're leaving out the offensive word. It might inspire TV and radio people to follow suit. When this little prick Snyder finally realizes he's all alone, then he might change his mind, and pull his head out of his ass. Maybe.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Not exactly a bastion of the lib'rul media.
I imagine it has a large Native American readership, though.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)... Mocked Dan Synder's defense of the name by saying it was the best defense Washington has had in a decade.
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)some publicly funded stadium tell its NFL team that teams with names like that won't be allowed to play there.
24601
(3,963 posts)Burf-_-
(205 posts)he is such a flaming asshat.
pansypoo53219
(21,005 posts)ondemand. just watched the 2004 election episode which referenced the redskins.