Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:00 AM Sep 2014

Facebook rebuffs drag queens on name policy

Source: Bay Area Reporter

San Francisco drag queens met with Facebook executives Wednesday but no changes were made to the social media company's policy on using real names.

The meeting came as a war of words has intensified over the social media service's policy on using real names instead of stage names on Facebook pages.

... At a news conference at City Hall Wednesday afternoon, San Francisco Supervisor David Campos said he, the drag queens, and others who met with Facebook staff were "hopeful we would be able to get" an acknowledgment from Facebook that its policy "was wrong and misguided," and that they would get the social site to lay out what steps would be taken to correct the situation.

"That, unfortunately, was not accomplished," Campos said, but "we are committed to continuing to work with Facebook."

Read more: http://ebar.com/news/article.php?sec=news&article=70016

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Facebook rebuffs drag queens on name policy (Original Post) Newsjock Sep 2014 OP
Why is Facebook being so assholish about this? Ken Burch Sep 2014 #1
Hell, yeah! tazkcmo Sep 2014 #2
Ok I would agree with Facebook IF yeoman6987 Sep 2014 #7
Truly eom catrose Sep 2014 #8
It's not just drag queens, trans people and abused spouses. Crash2Parties Sep 2014 #3
Issue goes back a few years dipsydoodle Sep 2014 #4
There you go. Android3.14 Sep 2014 #5
My facebook page isn't under my real name. How'd I get away with it? marble falls Sep 2014 #6
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
1. Why is Facebook being so assholish about this?
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:31 AM
Sep 2014

Drag performers aren't going to do hate speech or death threats.

There is no risk in letting them set up pages under their stage names.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
2. Hell, yeah!
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 01:34 AM
Sep 2014

One of my brothers established a FB page for me and w/o my prior knowledge or consent that I would not have given. I'm just not one of those people that want to post my life history for the world to see. I don't mind sharing opinions and news and factual information with total strangers (or kitteh /puppeh gifs!) but my life? No. That's mine.

Here on DU we have the choice to use what ever name we please and for lots of good reasons. Besides the issues mentioned in the article (Fairly summarized as safety concerns) there's the anonymity that the internet has always provided. Besides safety and personal security is the liberation that anonymity offers when discussing heated subjects and the exchange of ideas concerning emotional topics. Yes, that same anonymity allows for some really vile and disgusting exchanges but you always knew you were safe for the most part. Then came Face Book.

They REQUIRE your real name to be posted on line for the entire world to see. The same world that brought us Timothy McVay, Hitler, Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, etc. In a perfect world, no problem. In our world? Huge problem. Huge problem especially if you're "different". Transgender, gay, Muslim, socialist, left handed, left footed. You name it and there's some unbalanced, raged out, unbalanced and worse, LOCAL individual more than willing to put his/her rhetorical rantings on a message board into action given a LOCAL target. Face Book chooses to ignore this very real danger and they should be held accountable for any ill deed perpetrated against anybody due to their Face Book account what ever the content providing it violates no laws.

The people in this article just happen to be "drag queens" (performers/artists) but what they are saying holds true for all of us. As far as the internet is concerned, the option of anonymity is not only a good thing, it's the right thing. For the safety of all of us.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
7. Ok I would agree with Facebook IF
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 10:54 AM
Sep 2014

They also required Actors to use their real names to. For example, does Woopie Goldberg or Tom Cruise or Tim Allen or Queen Latefa have to use their real name or do they receive special treatment? Answer that and I can make a better opinion Facebook corporate.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
3. It's not just drag queens, trans people and abused spouses.
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 03:34 AM
Sep 2014

Anyone who has anything to hide from say, a very..."strongly opinionated" (as in, "we'll find a reason to fire you&quot employer also needs to keep their identity private if they are going to post on or discuss some topics. Let's say you work for say, a closely held corporation owned by Southern Baptists and have a gay child, for instance...or let's say you work for staunch liberal Democrats and you want to be able to post on the far right religious and hate groups you favor...

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
5. There you go.
Thu Sep 18, 2014, 06:35 AM
Sep 2014

If FB starts losing more money, then they will change the policy. Otherwise, there are plenty of other places for socializing.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Facebook rebuffs drag que...