Yellen Says US Families Need to Boost Savings
Source: Associated Press
The Great Recession showed that a large number of American families are "extraordinarily vulnerable" to financial setbacks because they have few assets to fall back on, Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen said Thursday
Yellen said a Fed survey found that an unexpected expense of just $400 would force the majority of American families to borrow money, sell something or simply not pay.
... She said the bottom fifth of households by income about 25 million households had median net worth in 2013 of just $6,400, and many of these families had nothing saved or negative net worth, meaning their debts were greater than their assets.
Yellen said that the Fed's 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances, an in-depth analysis of family wealth, found that the next one-fifth of households had a net worth of only $27,900 in 2013 and that both of the bottom two-fifths of households had seen declines in net worth since the Fed's last survey in 2010. She said one reason for this decline was that incomes for these families had continued to decline.
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/yellen-us-families-boost-savings-25589956
unblock
(52,212 posts)msongs
(67,405 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Is not like the corporations do not run agribusiness too. If you going to criticize, at least make sure it makes some sense. I have a feeling you will be saying the opposite had she come out and said we should spend more on food.
Warpy
(111,255 posts)so that people aren't losing money hand over fist due to inflation.
Yellen is as big an ignoramus as her predecessors, I do believe.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Back when we told to have IRAs and other retirement plans.
which made fund managers very very happy since they got to "manage" our captive money.
And what happened?
Just as we were reaching retirement age, we lost half of our savings to the dot com bubble
followed 8 years later by the housing bubble and the Great Treasury Rio Off of taxpayers.
gimme some of that 700 billion back that Paulson and Geitner stole, and I will have my "cushion" back.
politicat
(9,808 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Before I say something......
LoisB
(7,203 posts)IkeRepublican
(406 posts)They're always talking about what needs to be done, then quietly assuring what it takes to follow their suggestions is more difficult for working people.
Go f*** yourself, Janet.
840high
(17,196 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)I'll just buy a few less cans of black beans and tuna this week.
The disconnect is incredible.
christx30
(6,241 posts)She and her friends don't have to worry about those things. They are the type that can jet off to a boxing match in Vegas, just because. They don't worry if they can pad out their meals and their kids' bag lunches until their paychecks come through.
We need to get more industry back to the US. We need to get good manufacturing jobs back, and less of the low paying "service jobs".
Response to Newsjock (Original post)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
rogerashton
(3,920 posts)(Fair disclosure: like Yellen, I am an economist.)
The AP headline is deceptive. Yellen is describing WHAT IS -- not saying what people ought to do. It is a fact that about half of American families just have nothing to fall back on, and are vulnerable to setbacks from unexpected expenses of almost any size. THAT IS A PROBLEM and we ought to give Janet Yellen props for focusing on the problem, since, frankly, too many of my colleagues in economics do not see it as a problem nor even as a reality. I want to say that Janet Yellen is one of the good guys, except -- well -- she isn't exactly a guy.
Put the blame where it belongs: on ABCNEWS.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)No respect for those unable to find or hold a job, either.
No, Yellen is not getting off this hook she hung herself on.
rogerashton
(3,920 posts)Yellen knows what the problem is. Some have, most have not. If Democrats won't give Janet her props, we just get another Greenspan. Get real.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)I'm making $10/ hour at one gig, $8.50 at another/ and quitting the most lucrative (a paper route) because last winter nearly killed me.
I have a totally disabled child and she has a total asshole father.
It doesn't get much realer than that.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)yes indeed
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)The vice chair of the Fed is a Keynesian. All we have to do is elect a Democratic President next go around and the Fed head will be Fischer.
Of course if we lose the Presidency... well, good luck with that.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Then she can start by doing what Congress mandated the Fed. to do:
Provide for maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.
instead of protecting the big banks against the consequences of their greedy actions by keeping interest rates artificially low.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... because it does no good.
Make ZERO mistake folks, the Fed is knee deep in culpability for the current state of our economy.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)How does raising interest rates help prices and employment? It's a balance. And we're still coming out of a very bad recession.
The Fed is having to deal with a do-nothing congress and is merely keeping things balanced until actual reforms can be done. They have no power beyond that. Raise those interests rates and you put millions out of jobs.
rogerashton
(3,920 posts)What she can do to provide for maximum employment and stable prices is to keep interest rates "artificially low." She is doing that. If you want "moderate long-term interest rates," understand that that will mean less employment and might mean deflation -- which in turn would lead to more bankruptcies and probably still less unemployment.
This is what evidence and experience tell us. Religious devotees of Austrian economics will tell us that the Fed is the problem. Sometimes in the past it has been. Under Yellen the fed is doing what the law and the facts of the case permit. To demand more is wishful thinking and is destructive of progressive objectives.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)they have no power. As income inequality grows those with no power do as they are told. Work harder to grow the wealth of the 1%.
No Vested Interest
(5,166 posts)possible. at least 10% of income should be saved - 15 -20% is better. An emergency fund of 6-8 months is ideal in the current economy.
Big fan of Suzi Orman here - I've learned so much from watching her programs on Sat. night.
I also listen to Dave Ramsey's financial advice when in the car, though I don't care for his political stance.
Having little to no debt is the ideal - not easy when paying a mortgage and raising child/children.
The fact is we really don't need the latest toy, the newest car.
The peace of mind of not being burdened by the weight of debt is well worth it.
We don't have to follow the crowd.
Boomerproud
(7,952 posts)Vacation-haven't been on a trip since 2000. Work a temp job since being laid off in 2011. Work 10 hour days w/no time off.
Car-2007 Ford Focus
New clothes-ummm, don't think so.
Any other suggestions?
No Vested Interest
(5,166 posts)I sympathize with your plight.
That's why I'm so in favor of the ACA, and feel for those in states where Republican governors and legislatures have refused to implement additions to Medicaid.
Although I have Medicare and supplement, my daughter has gotten financial relief from exorbitant insurance costs through the ACA.
Son, until this year, had only catastrophic medical insurance.
He had gall bladder trouble - ER, overnight stay, expensive tests- in Dec, and had to swallow the huge deductible.
However, based on that he got silver plan insurance beginning last January, and, when gall bladder struck again, in Feb., he was better prepared re insurance to cover the cost of the surgery, tests, etc., he incurred.
Unfortunately, once stricken, as you have been, you can only start where you are.
Many on DU are in your shoes.
That's not reason, however, to warn those who are spending large on personal technology and other entertainment, and perhaps those who have had huge problems will agree.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Delphinus
(11,830 posts)I think your answer is the most succinct I've seen.
Doc Holliday
(719 posts)if it were actually news. For the last thirty-something years, the PTB have geared our economy for spending, not saving. Readily available credit, ridiculously low interest rates for saving accounts, the plethora of low-interest loans available to anyone-- the traditional savings mentality has been evicted and replaced with "spend, spend, spend!"
I know I'm an old fart, but I remember when it was actually rather hard to get a credit card.
mimi85
(1,805 posts)until we bought our first house. I guess the more you owe, the easier it is. Or was. I still don't have (or want) a Sears card. Got too many CCs as it is. I figure you never know when you might end up in a spot where you need one. So far, so good. Paid in full every month AND have 6 months savings. And we are so far from bucks up. My husband is a bit of a cheapskate - which actually has turned out well.
No Vested Interest
(5,166 posts)mimi85
(1,805 posts)But then you aren't married to him.
ebbie15644
(1,214 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)cactusfractal
(496 posts)And here I was spending all that money on stupid things like food, insurance and gas when I should've been saving it instead.
rury
(1,021 posts)you know, things like rent, car payments, auto insurance, food and utilities??
Increase people's WAGES and then we can SAVE!!
LoisB
(7,203 posts)"She said that the Fed wanted to promote efforts to encourage families to take small steps that could over time lead to the accumulation of assets."
What would those small steps be is what I would like to know. They can "encourage" all they want but if your entire paycheck or social security check goes to pay for mortgage or rent, food, transportation all the encouragement in the world won't make a difference.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)"She said one reason for this decline was that incomes for these families had continued to decline." Duh !! Janet L. Yellen reported investments worth at least $4.8 million in 2012, making her one of the wealthiest members of the Federal Reserves board of governors. Her husband is worth somewhere around 13 million.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Boomerproud
(7,952 posts)NOOOOO! What economics degree did she get?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)spooky3
(34,448 posts)She didn't say anything like that. All the quotes were simply explaining the straits the bottom 2/5ths were in and stating she was concerned about low wage growth.
It looks to me as if they are putting "blame the victim" words in her mouth.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)and say, "I will be able to save more money, I will be able to save more money, I will be able to save more money..." and our bank accounts will magically overflow with enough cash to live forever on.
So just chill out kids, I got this!
GeorgeGist
(25,320 posts)Marthe48
(16,950 posts)No matter if Janet Yellen is shining a light on the plight of the poor, or if she is essentially clueless--the country can't sustain the charade that the economy is good for everyone. If you can't keep a roof over your head, or feed your kids, frustration will turn into anger and anger into revolution. Right now, the rich think arming cops will protect them and their interests, but there are too many poor with no safety net. We aren't teaching history in school very well, so we are reliving the the Dark Ages, the Gilded Age and all the other times when the rich got too greedy. Awhile back, somebody on Du said something about the fact that Social Security is social security, something that the rich and powerful need to remember.
november3rd
(1,113 posts)Interest rates are so low, most of the major banks pay less than 1% interest on ordinary consumer savings accounts.
http://www.money-rates.com/savings.htm
You lose money by putting your savings there, because every other investment pays higher rates.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)I am addicted to roofs, hot water, and food. Those I am enslaved to are addicted to money and control.