Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 04:54 PM Sep 2014

Russia cries foul over Scottish independence vote, says it did not meet international standards

Source: Guardian

Russia has said the conduct of the Scottish referendum "did not meet international standards", with its observers complaining the count took place in rooms that were too big and that the procedure was badly flawed.

In an apparent attempt to mirror persistent western criticism of Russia's own elections, Igor Borisov – an accredited observer – said the poll failed to meet basic international norms.

Borisov and three other Russians arrived in Edinburgh on Wednesday evening, the state news agency Ria Novosti reported. The team from Moscow's Public Institute of Suffrage watched voting take place in the Scottish capital and the surrounding area. It also met with Scottish politicians, voters and representatives from non-governmental organisations, Ria said.

Borisov said he was unimpressed by what he saw. He said the room where he watched the count on Thursday night was a cavernous "aircraft hangar" next to an airfield. It was difficult to see what was going on, he said, adding: "The hangar is approximately 100m by 300m. There are tables, with voting papers stacked upon them, but the observers are stuck around the perimeter. Even if you want to, it's impossible to tell what's happening. It's also unclear where the boxes with ballot papers come from."

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/19/russia-calls-foul-scottish-referendum

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russia cries foul over Scottish independence vote, says it did not meet international standards (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Sep 2014 OP
Sounds like "the Onion", rather than the Guardian... n/t hlthe2b Sep 2014 #1
. geek tragedy Sep 2014 #2
You need to put "Not the Onion" in your title Blue_Tires Sep 2014 #3
lolz Drunken Irishman Sep 2014 #4
Then the observer added: "...and Scottish vodka sucks beeg time" FailureToCommunicate Sep 2014 #5
Excuse me while I... KamaAina Sep 2014 #6
Oh, fer the love of..... louis-t Sep 2014 #7
Translation = My "Online Troll Army" couldn't effect the outcome I wanted. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2014 #8
lol putie... EX500rider Sep 2014 #9
Dear Comrade Major Putin's mouthpiece-- STFU! n/t ColesCountyDem Sep 2014 #10
Then there's the old Soviet way of voting.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #11
I know you are joking, but they didn't have candidates. joshcryer Sep 2014 #13
The Soviet Union was over when they announced one party rule was over. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2014 #15
This is absolutely ludicrous. n/t amandabeech Sep 2014 #12
I believe the official, technical term for this is "Shit-Stirring." n/t TygrBright Sep 2014 #14
SHUT UP RUSSIA. You are not the boss of the UK, England or Scotland. trueblue2007 Sep 2014 #16
Oh Putin says... There goes another's country that I might like to have ...shoot Thekaspervote Sep 2014 #17
Reason 544 we shouldn't take anything Russia says seriously davidpdx Sep 2014 #18
Wrong election Stargleamer Sep 2014 #19
 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
11. Then there's the old Soviet way of voting....
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 05:59 PM
Sep 2014

Walk into the glass lined sealed booth and if you vote for the Soviet candidate you will hear the machine automatically register your vote. If you vote for the OTHER candidate then you will hear the machine drop a smoke pellet into a pan of sulfuric acid.

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
13. I know you are joking, but they didn't have candidates.
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 06:36 PM
Sep 2014

It was a yes or no vote for a pre-chosen candidate which was chosen by a top down committee. If one got a no vote it would go back to the selection process and the eventual choice would always be a party loyalist. If you weren't you'd never get selected.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
18. Reason 544 we shouldn't take anything Russia says seriously
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 08:38 PM
Sep 2014

All election in which the outcome doesn't agree with their opinion are fixed.


Where the fuck were they in 2000 btw?

Stargleamer

(1,989 posts)
19. Wrong election
Fri Sep 19, 2014, 09:46 PM
Sep 2014

Actually it was Gore vs. Bush that didn't meet international standards, of fairness, of counting every vote, of basic decency.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia cries foul over Sc...