Russia cries foul over Scottish independence vote, says it did not meet international standards
Source: Guardian
Russia has said the conduct of the Scottish referendum "did not meet international standards", with its observers complaining the count took place in rooms that were too big and that the procedure was badly flawed.
In an apparent attempt to mirror persistent western criticism of Russia's own elections, Igor Borisov an accredited observer said the poll failed to meet basic international norms.
Borisov and three other Russians arrived in Edinburgh on Wednesday evening, the state news agency Ria Novosti reported. The team from Moscow's Public Institute of Suffrage watched voting take place in the Scottish capital and the surrounding area. It also met with Scottish politicians, voters and representatives from non-governmental organisations, Ria said.
Borisov said he was unimpressed by what he saw. He said the room where he watched the count on Thursday night was a cavernous "aircraft hangar" next to an airfield. It was difficult to see what was going on, he said, adding: "The hangar is approximately 100m by 300m. There are tables, with voting papers stacked upon them, but the observers are stuck around the perimeter. Even if you want to, it's impossible to tell what's happening. It's also unclear where the boxes with ballot papers come from."
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/19/russia-calls-foul-scottish-referendum
hlthe2b
(102,196 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)louis-t
(23,284 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,228 posts)EX500rider
(10,834 posts)ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Walk into the glass lined sealed booth and if you vote for the Soviet candidate you will hear the machine automatically register your vote. If you vote for the OTHER candidate then you will hear the machine drop a smoke pellet into a pan of sulfuric acid.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)It was a yes or no vote for a pre-chosen candidate which was chosen by a top down committee. If one got a no vote it would go back to the selection process and the eventual choice would always be a party loyalist. If you weren't you'd never get selected.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)amandabeech
(9,893 posts)TygrBright
(20,755 posts)trueblue2007
(17,202 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,750 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)All election in which the outcome doesn't agree with their opinion are fixed.
Where the fuck were they in 2000 btw?
Stargleamer
(1,989 posts)Actually it was Gore vs. Bush that didn't meet international standards, of fairness, of counting every vote, of basic decency.