Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 10:44 AM Oct 2014

Record cesium level detected in Fukushima No. 1 groundwater; Tepco blames heavy rainfall

Source: Jiji

A record 264,000 becquerels of radioactive cesium per liter has been detected in groundwater at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power station, Tokyo Electric Power Co. disclosed Saturday.

The sample was taken Thursday from an observation well near reactor 2 reactor of the plant, which was destroyed by the March 2011 quake and tsunami.

According to Tepco, recent heavy rains pushed up the levels of groundwater, causing it to reach soil containing highly radioactive water leaked earlier from the plant’s crippled reactors.

The per liter level of cesium-137 rose to 200,000 becquerels from 190,000 becquerels in groundwater sampled from the same well on Wednesday. The cesium-134 level was unchanged at 64,000 becquerels.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/10/18/national/science-health/record-cesium-level-detected-in-fukushima-no-1-groundwater-tepco-blames-heavy-rainfall/

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Record cesium level detected in Fukushima No. 1 groundwater; Tepco blames heavy rainfall (Original Post) bananas Oct 2014 OP
Tepco's reliability of reporting is not suspect, because? KJG52 Oct 2014 #1
Ahhh, I believe hard rain ain't the main problem...no? drynberg Oct 2014 #2
Does the 'why' matter if there's nothing they can do about it? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #3
Fukushima deserves more scrutiny. JEB Oct 2014 #4
Cesium is what they measured. Octafish Oct 2014 #5
Oh, c'mon Octafish RobertEarl Oct 2014 #7
Cesium 137 is the primary thing they should be looking for. Calista241 Oct 2014 #10
Wouldn't that be a heavy cesiumfall? n/t Bossy Monkey Oct 2014 #6
drip, drip, drip heaven05 Oct 2014 #8
I wonder what the Strontium-90 levels are...n/t. roamer65 Oct 2014 #9
Ebola! librechik Oct 2014 #11

KJG52

(70 posts)
1. Tepco's reliability of reporting is not suspect, because?
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 10:54 AM
Oct 2014

No information can be taken at face value from the Japanese government or TEPCO about the events past or present at Fukushima. Unfortunately, the press are not allowed within 25 kilometers of Fukushima and independent scientific evaluation of TEPCO's reactors and the Japanese government's actions in regard to those reactors have been haphazard because of the actions of TEPCO and the Japanese government.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
3. Does the 'why' matter if there's nothing they can do about it?
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 11:20 AM
Oct 2014

It is what it is, and it's a direct result of poor decisions made years (decades?) in the past about using nuclear power and placing those reactors where they did, no matter how it's happening.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
4. Fukushima deserves more scrutiny.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 11:33 AM
Oct 2014

More scrutiny from the press, from scientists and from government.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
5. Cesium is what they measured.
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 12:20 PM
Oct 2014

Wonder what else is in the water?

We'd know, if the governments of Japan and the United States wanted us to know.

Then, we'd have to live in a democracy, rather than under atomic occupation martial law or whatever this is we are living under where Fukushima and WIPP can vent whatever without us getting a little warning, let alone knowing.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
7. Oh, c'mon Octafish
Sat Oct 18, 2014, 11:35 PM
Oct 2014

They don't think we are smart enough. See, they think one has to be a real - paid by the industry scientist - in order to understand that this could never happen and that it is absolutely safe to run nuke plants. Even when they go boom.

We should just set back and let them run the show. And contentedly be amazed at their fireworks. BOOM!

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
10. Cesium 137 is the primary thing they should be looking for.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 10:52 PM
Oct 2014

It's one of the primary byproducts of a nuclear fission. It's not naturally occurring and has a half life of 30 years or so. It is also environmentally damaging and a highly dangerous substance.

The amount of 264k becquerels per liter is not lethal, but it is toxic. Testing for cesium 137 has occurred around the Chernobyl reactor, and occurs all over Europe at regular intervals to determine lingering environmental effects from Chernobyl 28 years after the fact. They still test for it in the South Pacific where we tested our nuclear weapons.

I imagine some independent agency ran the test because i have next to no confidence TEPCO actually knows what they're doing.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Record cesium level detec...