Judge rejects Ebola quarantine for nurse
Source: Yahoo (AP)
FORT KENT, Maine (AP) A Maine judge has rejected a bid by state health officials to restrict the movement of nurse Kaci Hickox, who defied a quarantine for medical workers who have treated Ebola patients.
Judge Charles C. LaVerdiere ruled Friday that she should continue daily monitoring and coordinate travel with state officials so monitoring can continue. But, because she's not showing symptoms, the judge says she's not infectious.
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/life-goes-nurse-standoff-over-ebola-053514854.html
One small step for civil liberties!
notrightatall
(410 posts)A big win for sanity!!
Gov. Ebola can go f himself.
missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)Seems so rare these days. . . .
notrightatall
(410 posts)Warpy
(111,169 posts)Kudos to the judge for knowing what's going on.
jopacaco
(133 posts)This fool of a governor got elected with just over a third of the votes in a 3 way election. Most of us here are literate and sane.
(Now I may have a different opinion if this fool manages to get re-elected on Tuesday).
heaven05
(18,124 posts)democrank
(11,085 posts)Rachel Maddow did an enlightening Ebola segment last night.
malthaussen
(17,175 posts)Now, is the Guv going to appeal? I wouldn't put it past him, but I dunno if this kind of ruling can be appealed.
-- Mal
Scairp
(2,749 posts)Who knows with that guy. Good for the judge though. It's nice to see common sense and reason win out.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)dlwickham
(3,316 posts)your mother smells of elderberries and your father is a hamster, or vice versa
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)According to Google it is Chinese for "incredible" and I
tried it in reverse as well.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)sarge43
(28,940 posts)Who da thought.
Eridenus
(52 posts)I'm sick of hearing the same old shit.
Flu is even more dangerous than Ebola, for crissake. That's why I got my shot last Friday.
I suggest you do the same, and worry the least about Ebola. The nurse knew the risk and I just read about a Stanford doctor willing to self-quarantine after his deployment. That is his choice, and of course, Stanford will cover his salary (based what I've read).
I'm glad the judge lifted the order - he did the right thing.
When she becomes symptomatic (which I highly doubt), she will go where she needs to go.
missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)DU has a substantial number of members who seem to feel that infringing on someone's civil rights is absolutely fine if we happen to be afraid or a little uncomfortable.
It doesn't seem to matter that there is no science to support them- their argument seems to be that there is not 100% conclusive proof that they are wrong, so, for the sake of safety, we should just assume they are right.
I hope that this decision persuades them otherwise, but am not holding my breath.
This nurse is a hero for what she has done for Ebola patients and for what she has done to defend the civil rights of Americans. It would have been easy enough to just stay home for a few weeks. and not fight this fight. She has my admiration and respect.
Jazzgirl
(3,744 posts)i find it very discouraging to see many so called "progressives" echoing the same crap repuke claim. Lots of trolls here now.
cynzke
(1,254 posts)Hang her, she's a witch feeling/hysteria that took over settlers in Massachusetts.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... war between science and ignorance. Just heard someone on Ronan Farrow's show say that what we really have is an epidemic of fear.
I'll go him one better: What we have here is an epidemic of ignorance.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)Renew Deal
(81,847 posts)He was a huge Iron Maiden fan. It can't possibly be the same person.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)notrightatall
(410 posts)MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)notrightatall
(410 posts)LeftInTX
(25,141 posts)I think it was so the judge would have time to review the case and issue a decision.
I agree it is confusing. The media apparently was slow to pick up on the quarantine order. Shortly after they did, the judge issued his decision.
notrightatall
(410 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Ebola update: Maine judge rejects quarantine for nurse Kaci Hickox
missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)A Maine judge on Friday ruled that state health officials failed to prove the need for an order enforcing an Ebola quarantine for a nurse who defied the quarantine in a tense standoff with state authorities. (emphasis added)
To be fair, CNN has apparently not changed the headline from their article published last night, and this is an update.
TM99
(8,352 posts)She must submit to "direct active monitoring," coordinate travel with public health officials, and immediately notify health authorities should symptoms appear.
This is a step up from the simplistic idea that a health professional is somehow 'special' and can just self-monitor only while carrying on whatever public activities they so choose.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)T"he order hands a win to the Kaci Hickox in her high-profile battle with state officials. She said in a press conference outside her house: "I am very satisfied with the decision. ... I will continue to be compliant. And yes, it's just a good, a good day."
Maine Gov. Paul LePage issued a statement saying they would abide by the law.'
Ebola governors 0. Kaci Hickox, R.N., M.P.H, 2.
Scairp
(2,749 posts)She's already doing that. State officials with CDC have been to her house every day since she got home. He only reinforced the fact that the virus is not transmittable by someone NOT exhibiting symptoms and told her to do what she is doing. She has been home six days so if she were going to get sick she will know probably by Monday. Fingers crossed for her that she doesn't.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)She was already following CDC recommendations, which is what the judge ordered her to do.
And in fact, in the discussions that "broke down" she had offered to do *more* than what the judge ultimately ruled.
But yeah, keep trying to smear the nurse and paint it like a victory for the teabagger who is politicizing a public health issue for the election.
TM99
(8,352 posts)The new CDC ones, as of 10/27, are broken down into levels. I already posted that link. Self-monitoring IS NOT direct active monitoring. You know that, right?
I don't have to smear this nurse. She has done a bang up job all by herself.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)if they changed their guidelines, then she's agreeing to their new guidelines.
Your link downthread doesn't work.
"She has claimed that she should be exempt from anything except the most basic of self-monitoring. She can go where she pleases, when she pleases, and if she gets sick, then she will deal with it. She is zero risk in her mind."
Link to those claims?
TM99
(8,352 posts)and her own words.
Look it up yourself. I am done catering to those with myopic minds and attitudes.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)I live in Maine and am a healthcare worker. I have read extensively on the outbreak since it's beginning, and being a Mainer, especially followed those articles regarding Kaci Hickox's incarceration.
I've also followed the bombastic teapartier's politicization of Ebola from the moment he made his big announcement re: the negative test for the suspicious patient who was treated in my hospital system a few weeks back.
He tried to score political points off an MSF volunteer and simultaneously bail out his teapartier friend, Crispe Creme. They both ended up with egg on their faces.
Myopic mind?
Good day to you to.
mythology
(9,527 posts)The facts should win out.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)The frightened citizens would have burned her at the stake!
Go ahead and tell me I'm wrong!
America hasn't changed a bit. Land of the free and home of the brave my ass!
7962
(11,841 posts)I think what the Pres did the other day was a good shot. Read my post below.
malthaussen
(17,175 posts)They would have been afraid of contracting the disease. What they would have done is wall her up in her house and set fire to it.
-- Mal
MontyPow
(285 posts)Gothmog
(144,939 posts)This case was a loser
missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)I've read WAY too many posts over the past several days attacking this woman, and insisting that quarantine was necessary and appropriate.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)This was the Hail Mary Pass.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I think it would help aleivate some fears.
7962
(11,841 posts)News people kept saying the "21 days" hadnt gone by yet, was the president taking a risk, etc. To me it showed him backing up what he thought was right. The old saying, put your money where your mouth is. Well, by standing with these doctors, Obama did just that.
I remember years ago a problem with the local water supply was cleared up and the head of the water dept standing on TV and filling up a glass from the tap and drinking it, to show everyone that the water really WAS safe to drink.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)pointed at as the trolls they have become.
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)While many people were acting out of fear that is not entirely rational when it comes to the deadly Ebola outbreak, the judge said that fear was present and real.
The actions of Hickox, as a health professional, "need to demonstrate her full understanding of human nature and the real fear that exist," LaVerdiere wrote. "She should guide herself accordingly."
This is being spun as a total victory for Hickox. It is not. She has claimed that she should be exempt from anything except the most basic of self-monitoring. She can go where she pleases, when she pleases, and if she gets sick, then she will deal with it. She is zero risk in her mind.
The State of Maine wanted a strict isolation-style quarantine in her home because they believe the risk is higher.
The judge denied that, and yet still put stricter requirements on her than what she has said she would tolerate. The new CDC guidelines from 10/27 speak to this new reality - http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/fs1027-monitoring-symptoms-controlling-movement.html.
The judge considers her actions to fall into the 'some' to 'high' risk category as his requirements for her follow that level of CDC recommendations not the 'no' to 'low risk' status categories.
She must submit to direct active monitoring and she must notify officials of any travel plans. I applaud the ruling as it strikes a good balance between her belief that she is zero risk and the reality that until the 21 day incubation period passes, due to her work in Africa, she is some risk or even high risk.
"She should guide herself accordingly" I repeat. She has not until now, and today she is being required to do so.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 24, 2020, 12:52 PM - Edit history (3)
The latest recommendations are here:
http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/fs1027-monitoring-symptoms-controlling-movement.pdf
What's she's refused to do is follow the guidelines that Christie and LePage were making up as they went along!
rocktivity
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)FORT KENT Maine Governor Paul LePage failed to convince Judge Charles C. LaVerdiere Friday, October 31, that Kaci Hickox must follow U.S. Center for Disease Control guidelines, which other experts say she is already following.
Fort Kent Police Chief Tom Pelletier spoke with Hickox this morning, and told reporters they just had a conversation, and that he was not arresting Hickox or her boyfriend, Ted Wilbur.
More local coverage headlines and ledes at the link.
There's also a poll on the right-hand side of the page you can vote on - Does public fear trump a person's Constitutional rights?
vlakitti
(401 posts)"The court is fully aware of the misconceptions, misinformation, bad
science and bad information being spread from shore to shore in our
country with respect to Ebola," he wrote. "The court is fully aware
that people are acting out of fear and that this fear is not entirely
rational."
So the Judge is not only clued in on the science issue but the stupid and lying misinformation campaigns out these.
As for the nurse Kaci Hickox, this is total vindication and a triumph over three lousy and pandering governors, AND a real victory for civil liberties.
TM99
(8,352 posts)the full context of his ruling:
The judge said that fear was present and real.
The actions of Hickox, as a health professional, "need to demonstrate her full understanding of human nature and the real fear that exist," LaVerdiere wrote. "She should guide herself accordingly."
vlakitti
(401 posts)The judge was not criticizing the nurse, not at all.
"In a case that has come to define the clash between personal freedom
and fear of disease, Judge Charles C. LaVerdiere ruled Hickox must
continue daily monitoring and cooperate with health officials if she
chooses to travel. The judge said there's no need to restrict her
movements because she's not showing symptoms of Ebola.
"In his ruling, the judge thanked Hickox for her service in Africa and
wrote that "people are acting out of fear and that this fear is not
entirely rational.""
That's exactly the protocol she's been following. Do you think she's utterly irresponsible? She knows all about Ebola, and the turkey governors she's defied don't.
And she's a champion for civil liberties.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Don't let your unjustified fears ruin other people's lives.
TM99
(8,352 posts)I am not scared of Ebola. I do recognize that the public at large is. He said she has a responsibility. Period.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)is not real. Why does she have a "responsibility" to acquiesce to others irrational fears?
TM99
(8,352 posts)The realities behind it often are not. Education not brow beating and bleating on about 'science wins' is how the fearful become un-fearful.
Public health policy is the balance between science, politics, and social psychology.
Look to the actions of Dr. Dahn for elucidation of this.
notrightatall
(410 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)Your mind reading sucks.
yellowcanine
(35,694 posts)Now I would like to see someone challenge N.J. and Krispy Kritter in court on whether he can detain air passengers landing in N.J. when they are not showing symptoms and have tested negative for Ebola.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)be confirmed with an oral thermometer reading at the airports, as Nurse Hickcox has taught us that the forehead scanners are not reliable.
Of course, if Christie really wanted to protect the people of New Jersey, he would have required that anyone wishing to travel from an Ebola-affected country wait 21 days and pass a blood test -- even if it meant cutting into his Port Authority's airline ticket income.
rocktivity
yellowcanine
(35,694 posts)He's a doctor. He knows when someone is sick.
KMOD
(7,906 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)diabeticman
(3,121 posts)Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)quarantined.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)he was blinded by science!
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)but unfortunately is the human condition generated by the media and must be grudgingly accepted.
Too hard for some to grasp, I guess.
Chemisse
(30,803 posts)Not only has she stood up to two governors and braved the fear and wrath of strangers, she has actually been with Ebola patients and treated them. And she comes back to the US to find the rest of us scared of our shadows - terrified to have someone among us who is not sick, not contagious, but could possibly get the disease at some point in the next few weeks.
And what's even more ludicrous is the public panic over a virus that is proving to be a lot less deadly when faced with modern health care - such as IV fluids. So far, Duncan is the only victim who died; he is also the only one who didn't get medical care early in the course of the disease.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)C.O.D. motherfucker.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Until condemned by a qualified witch-smeller, this so-called nurse should mind her tongue.