Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,333 posts)
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 08:25 AM Nov 2014

UKIP's Reckless wins Rochester and Strood seat

Source: BBC

UKIP has its second elected MP at Westminster after Mark Reckless won the Rochester and Strood by-election.

Mr Reckless took 16,867 votes, 2,920 more than Conservative Kelly Tolhurst's 13,947, with Labour's Naushabah Khan on 6,713 - ahead of the Green Party.

The Lib Dems came fifth with their lowest vote total in a by-election.

Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-30140747

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UKIP's Reckless wins Rochester and Strood seat (Original Post) brooklynite Nov 2014 OP
Crap news all round. T_i_B Nov 2014 #1
Not the UK's finest hour. LeftishBrit Nov 2014 #2
That does sound reckless. daleo Nov 2014 #3
Labour chose the wrong candidate. n/t cosmicone Nov 2014 #4
Any reason why? T_i_B Nov 2014 #5
Labour had no chance in the constituency; it was between the Tories and UKIP. Between bad and worse! LeftishBrit Nov 2014 #7
I spent a semester studying the EU. iandhr Nov 2014 #6

LeftishBrit

(41,203 posts)
2. Not the UK's finest hour.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 09:49 AM
Nov 2014

Apart from having defected to a party which is more-or-less Britain's equivalent of the Tea Party, he is probably best known for missing an important Commons vote on the grounds that he was too drunk.

T_i_B

(14,735 posts)
5. Any reason why?
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:04 AM
Nov 2014

I heard very little about any candidate other then Reckless (and from what I've heard Reckless wasn't that good a candidate himself)

If you are referring to Emily Thornberry, she wasn't the candidate here. She's the MP for Islington South & Finsbury.

LeftishBrit

(41,203 posts)
7. Labour had no chance in the constituency; it was between the Tories and UKIP. Between bad and worse!
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:36 AM
Nov 2014

A past version of the constituency was once a marginal Labour seat; but since boundary changes, Labour is now out of the running.

I don't think there was any problem with the Labour candidate; you may be thinking of Emily Thornberry, a now former Minister and never an MP for this constituency, who had to resign from the front bench following an ill-judged tweet.

iandhr

(6,852 posts)
6. I spent a semester studying the EU.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:33 AM
Nov 2014

There is some very legitimate anger with Brussels do to the fact that so much power is in the hands of people who haven't been elected telling member states how to run their countries.

The far right has been able to successfully tap into this anger. Unless some of the non-wacko parties can come up with a response this is going to keep happening.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UKIP's Reckless wins Roch...