ACLU wins federal court orders on right to film police in Ferguson, elsewhere
Source: STL Post-Dispatch
ST. LOUIS The ACLU of Missouri has secured three federal court orders regarding citizens right to record police, as the region girds for potential protests in the days ahead.
The orders signed by U.S. District Judge John A. Ross are in response to a motion filed by the ACLU last week. The organization complained that authorities were still inhibiting filming of protest-related events, despite earlier court agreements with St. Louis County, Ferguson and Missouri Highway Patrol Superintendent Ronald Replogle.
Friday's court orders say the highway patrol and county police are "permanently enjoined from enforcing a policy or custom of interfering with individuals who are photographing or recording at public places but who are not threatening the safety of others or physically interfering with the ability of law enforcement to perform their duties."
The wording reflects the earlier agreement between the parties reached on Aug. 15.
Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/aclu-wins-federal-court-orders-on-right-to-film-police/article_7deb6bf7-c619-55d3-ae22-141e6cb4d3e8.html
Cops are no different than ordinary citizens, there is no expectation of privacy in a public setting.
jobendorfer
(508 posts)have no expectation of privacy whatsoever.
Their actions should be recordable and reviewable by anyone.
That's just one of the conditions of the job.
J.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Chef Eric
(1,024 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)if the cops and the National Guard respect it. They would probably claim to protect those people. At least
they did that in NYC with reporters filming the OWS situation.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)To get away with such behavior. Prior to the OWS events and the proliferation of "bad cop" videos on YouTube, many people probably thought that cops had the right to shut down filming.
Not any more.
quadrature
(2,049 posts)where is Michael Moore?