Obama says will push US labor unions to back free trade agreements
Source: CNBC (Reuters)
U.S. President Barack Obama acknowledged differences within his own Democratic Party on free trade agreements that he supports and vowed to make a strong case for trade to Congress.
Obama said free trade is "tough politics" among some lawmakers because many Americans feel their wages and income have stagnated as a result of foreign trade.
He said his argument to U.S. labor unions and environmental groups concerned about the impact of free-trade agreements is that they are accepting a status quo that is damaging to American workers.
"Part of my argument to Democrats is: don't fight the last war," Obama told the Business Roundtable, referring to past battles over free trade.
Read more: http://www.cnbc.com/id/102236609#.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)donnasgirl
(656 posts)Of local 2343 in NY i can tell you with a certain amount of certainty that will cost many more votes for any politician who backs the trade agreement.
Judi Lynn
(160,555 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,667 posts)Did I say that our loud?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)"Don't fight the last war that you lost, instead prepare to lose another one"?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)wages in the country started their down ward trend with the NAFTA CAFTA garbage. Who the hell paid the price,the Union men and Women. Good f--n luck selling this POS. Just like NAFTA there were supposed to be safe guards but the Corporatist Senators pulled the language in order to get it passed and signed by Billy Boy. To many long memories out there and this is doomed hopefully. Capital is fungible and were it goes knows no boundaries and this is the lesson of NAFTA. China is not a financial wonder land. It's a managed economy and there is at present a awakening happening. Got a hunch GE and Morgan Stanley are drivers of this POS.
Did we see President Obama as who he really supports or is this a mirage?
pampango
(24,692 posts)Indeed the status quo is far from acceptable. However for any new agreement to represent an improvement it would have to contain strong, enforceable labor and environmental standards. If there are any such standards in the agreements, they are a well-kept secret. The 'status quo' though bad, may be preferable.
msongs
(67,421 posts)to international corporations - handing over our own rights to international corporations and their international justice systems they have bought and created. overruling our own laws passed by elected politicians, laws both good and bad, overturning locally dictated policies and that sort of thing.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)AKA TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership)
Flood WH, Senators and Reps, Union leaders, with calls, emails, letters saying NO to Shafta!
Stryder
(450 posts)Damn, TPP's been scaring the shit out of me (Done deal IMHO.) I know nothing of SHFTA.
But how close are they going to get to just spelling it out?
SHaFTAmerica.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)I heard her talk about it many times as a guest on the Thom Hartmann Show. They call the trade deals NAFTA, CAFTA & SHaFTA.
http://www.talkradionews.com/staff#.VH_khhKCOSM
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Obama is a phony.
He is not on the side of the American people and he never was.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)"both parties"? In this way, he sometimes speaks about the Republican Party and the Democratic Party as if they are essentially interchangeable.
It's not a big BIG deal, but it's an annoying peccadillo of his, and I would have thought someone would have told him he LEADS one of those parties in "both parties".
4dsc
(5,787 posts)This will go over like a lead balloon
That will never happen NAFTA helped destroy Unions can't see them wanting to shoot there selves in the other foot
ut oh
(896 posts)he wants us to admit defeat and jump on the bandwagon... I mean... how worse can it get?? Free trade will be all rainbows and unicorns right?
amandabeech
(9,893 posts)I hope that Trumka tells our President what he can do with the TPP, etc.
OhioChick
(23,218 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Truly, I am baffled. It's the ONLY war.
ChromeFoundry
(3,270 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)there was a sign at a protest that read: "After NAFTA the shafta" And here's the second act.
Poppy9159
(11 posts)So now Obama wants labor to support this initiative. Overall, Obama has been an enormous disappointment to the labor movement. Remember when he said "If you're on the picket line I'll put on my walking shoes and join you." (paraphrase) Never happened. These free trade agreements have never ended up good for working people. We should oppose this one.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,645 posts)Welcome to DU!
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)elzenmahn
(904 posts)...or get excited about Dem candidates...
...when this BULLSHIT is what we get from many of them.
And BTW - see any difference between this and HRC? I don't.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'm calling it a night. G'night everyone, hopefully this episode of the twilight zone ends when I wake up!
pa28
(6,145 posts)Bragi
(7,650 posts)Not likely though. Trade deals are now corporate/investor "rights" charters that have little to do with actual trade
GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)Even dems now sticking it to the working man.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Why would I do it again?
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)to come.
neverforget
(9,436 posts)Why doesn't he just say "Stop fighting for good paying jobs in America and accept our corporate overlords every wish?"