Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bill USA

(6,436 posts)
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 05:46 PM Nov 2014

HALLELUJUH!!! PBS allowed the word "filibuster" to be uttered onthe 11/7/14 broadcast ofthe NewsHour

As far as I know THIS IS THE FIRST TIME ANY OF THE M$M NETWORKS HAS ALLOWED THE VERBOTEN WORD "FILIBUSTER" TO BE SPOKEN SINCE BARACK OBAMA WAS ELECTED. Obviously, if nobody could utter the word "filibuster" then it was pretty hard for anybody to report the fact that the GOP has set records for filibustering during Obama's presidency. Which would have been a little problematic when the GOP set out to blame Obama and 'his policies' for any perceived inadequacy in the recovery. (Wouldn't do to have voters hear that the GOP filibustered several jobs bills proposed by the President and Democrats, now would it?)

Don't believe me? Hey , I don't blame you. But here's what Mark Shields actually said on FRidays PBS Newshour broadcast:


from the transcript..

"I think it’s awfully important to point out that Mitch McConnell now is against gridlock and dysfunction.

[font size="+1"]There were 458 times during Barack Obama’s six years in office that there had been a filibuster or the threat of a filibuster to stop the Senate from acting. During Dwight Eisenhower’s eight years, there were two. During Ronald Reagan’s, there were 75 in eight years.

This is in six years.[/font] So it’s going to be a total — it’s going to be a 180 if, in fact, this does happen. And the Senate is tough, because all it takes is one person to stop it. And you can talk about it’s not being a Ted Cruz caucus or a Mike Lee caucus. But I really think it’s going to be a problem for the Republicans. And I think that’s where the action is, is to watch that dynamic."


... of course, this was AFTER the last election of Obama's presidency --- so I guess the GOP thought: "Hell, let 'em say it. we don't give a shit. We pulled off the 'Sabotage and blame Obama' trick already. Too late for voters to ask for a 'do-over'! Ha-ha-ha-ha! Yeah, tell the PBS we'll allow it."





2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
HALLELUJUH!!! PBS allowed the word "filibuster" to be uttered onthe 11/7/14 broadcast ofthe NewsHour (Original Post) Bill USA Nov 2014 OP
the election is over and they got the results they wanted so it doesnt matter to them belzabubba333 Nov 2014 #1
^This. Exactly. Word for word.^ blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #2
 

belzabubba333

(1,237 posts)
1. the election is over and they got the results they wanted so it doesnt matter to them
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 07:28 PM
Nov 2014

you'll hear it a lot now that the cons hold CONgress. before it was reported as congress failed to meet the 60 vote threshold as if that's just the normal number of votes needed to pass anything, now that dems will be doing it all you'll hear is "DEMOCRATS FILIBUSTER ANOTHER REPUBLICAN BILL"

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
2. ^This. Exactly. Word for word.^
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 01:06 AM
Nov 2014

That's how the DC charade is played.

And they help keep moving the Country to the Right.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»HALLELUJUH!!! PBS allowed...