Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,515 posts)
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 07:30 PM Dec 2014

SCOTUS Rules Workers Don't Need to Be Paid for All Their Time Working

SCOTUS Rules Workers Don't Need to Be Paid for All Their Time Working
Thursday, 18 December 2014 11:44
By Moshe Z. Marvit, In These Times | Report

Stories of the horrid conditions for workers in Amazon warehouses have been trickling out for years: The temperatures at the warehouses vary wildly, with some workers having to work in sub-zero conditions, others passing out from days where the temperature soared above 100 degrees, workers crying from not being able to keep up the brutal pace demanded, and then being threatened with termination for crying. And we can now add another indignity to the list, coming yesterday at the hands of the US Supreme Court, which ruled in a 9-0 decision that it is legal for Amazon warehouse workers not to be paid for a portion of their workday.

At the end of long, taxing shifts at warehouses, Amazon requires workers to go through security screenings to ensure that no one has stolen anything from the warehouse. Because Amazon does not hire enough security guards or stagger the quitting times of the workers, these screenings add an additional 25 minutes to each employee’s shift. These workers sued, arguing that under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), the staffing company that hired them to work in Amazon warehouses was required to pay them for the time spent in these security checks.

Writing for a unanimous court in Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk, Justice Clarence Thomas disagreed. (Though the workers work at an Amazon warehouse, they are hired through the intermediary staffing company, Integrity Staffing Solutions.)

At issue was a provision that Congress placed in the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, which amended the FLSA by excluding “activities which are preliminary to or postliminary to said principal activity or activities.” The courts have included in the definition of “principal activities” anything that is “integral and indispensable” to the principal activities. In other words, as the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (which found in favor of the workers) stated, the test is whether the activity is necessary for the work being performed and done for the benefit of the employer.

More:
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/28088-scotus-rules-workers-don-t-need-to-be-paid-for-all-their-time-working





8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS Rules Workers Don't Need to Be Paid for All Their Time Working (Original Post) Judi Lynn Dec 2014 OP
Wonder if that applies to congress? It should. jwirr Dec 2014 #1
Congress isn't paid by the hour. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #2
I know but imagine who much money we would save if they were. jwirr Dec 2014 #3
Organize, Unionize and bypass SCOTUS mikekohr Dec 2014 #4
Agreed it sound like really need to unionize if they want better treatment. nt cstanleytech Dec 2014 #5
We have met the enemy, and the enemy is the SC world wide wally Dec 2014 #6
Scalia's Court Derek V Dec 2014 #7
We workers have no one on our side. Brigid Dec 2014 #8

world wide wally

(21,740 posts)
6. We have met the enemy, and the enemy is the SC
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 10:38 AM
Dec 2014

Absolute worst SC in history finishing what the worst president (Bush) started.
No wonder this country is fucked up, you Republican nimrods.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»SCOTUS Rules Workers Don'...