Take Cuba off the Terrorist List

[Judi Lynn]

January 29, 2015

Drop the Label

Take Cuba off the Terrorist List

by MEDEA BENJAMIN


The new US-Cuba talks are a refreshing burst of sunshine in the 54-year dismal relationship between neighbors separated by a mere 90 miles. The nations negotiated a successful swap of prisoners. The onerous travel restrictions the US government placed on just visiting the island are starting to crumble. Embassies in Washington and Havana will soon be opened. Rules designed to ease trade are being written. But despite this long-awaited meltdown of US policies that added to the island’s economic woes but never succeeded in tumbling Cuba’s communist government, a portion of the Cold War edifice remains intact: Cuba is still on the US terrorist list.

This list, reserved for countries that have “repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism”, is a very short one. It doesn’t include Saudi Arabia, the country that accounted for 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 and has been responsible for spreading extremist Wahhabi ideology throughout the Middle East. It doesn’t include Pakistan, a country that has long been a staging ground for Islamic terrorists and on the receiving end of US drone strikes for the past decade. It certainly doesn’t include Israel, a country Amnesty International called “trigger happy” for using “unnecessary, arbitrary and brutal force” against Palestinians. It doesn’t even include North Korea, a country that recently threatened to bomb the “White House, the Pentagon and the whole US mainland.”

Of the world’s 196 countries, only four are included: Iran, Sudan, Syria….and Cuba.

The US government first put Cuba on the list three decades ago, in 1982, accusing the island of providing a safe haven for members of the Basque separatist group ETA and Colombia’s FARC rebels. It also accused Cuba of providing political asylum to Americans facing criminal and terrorism charges. In 2006, the State Department added that Cuba opposed the US-led war on terror and made no attempt to “track, block, or seize terrorist assets.”

Over the years, these accusations have faded as Latin American dictatorships were overthrown and leftist groups started using the ballot instead of bullets to gain power. In Columbia, where decades-long fighting between government and guerrilla groups persists, Cuba has become an internationally recognized and appreciated mediator hosting peace talks. The ETA called a ceasefire in 2011 and said it would disarm. And despite US accusations, after 9/11 Fidel Castro roundly condemned terrorism, refused to harbor individuals wanted for terrorism, and signed onto all UN-sanctioned anti-terrorism treaties.

More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/01/29/take-cuba-off-the-terrorist-list/

[MisterP]

1. it's literally on the list because revolutions happened and Washington decreed that those couldn't

happen autochthonously: there HAD to be someone pulling the strings and pipelining arms; they literally said it was impossible for revolutionaries to get local support

Kirkpatrick said Americans had to be weaned from their attitude that "peace is a norm and that war and violence are abnormal": Carter had allowed the Great Global Communist Conspiracy's replacement of "moderate autocrats friendly to the U.S. with less friendly autocrats of extremist persuasion" that wouldn't nurse those Latin savages until they were ready for democracy (probably only in the 21st century); she also said that unrest shouldn't be seen as a sign of discontent (since people will gladly put their lives on the line at the say-so of shadowy outsiders puppeteered by the Russkies)

Reagan was "a Bircher nut" to Sinatra: he said that "The Soviet Union underlies all the unrest that is going on. If they weren't engaged in this game of dominoes, there wouldn't be any hot spots in the world": in other words, all war and terrorism were caused by Moscow (and yet we have war and terror after 1991--funny, that)