Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(36,281 posts)
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 01:00 AM Feb 2015

Seven big myths about top-performing school systems (BBC)

By Andreas Schleicher
OECD director of education and skills

The man in charge of the Pisa tests, Andreas Schleicher, says the evidence from around the world reveals some big myths about what makes for a successful education system.
***
What the comparisons do show is that socio-economic disadvantage has a particularly strong impact on student performance in the United State{s}.

In other words, in the United States two students from different socio-economic backgrounds vary much more in their learning outcomes than is typically the case in OECD countries.
***
More interestingly, the highest performing education systems in Pisa tend to systematically prioritise the quality of teachers over the size of classes. Wherever they have to make a choice between a smaller class and a better teacher, they go for the latter.

Rather than putting money into small classes, they invest in competitive teacher salaries, ongoing professional development and a balance in working time.
***
more: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-31087545

Hmmm ... how many OECD countries finance their school systems through their *local* property taxes ? Just wondering.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
2. I think it was the philosopher Jager that said "You can't always get what you want"
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 07:26 AM
Feb 2015

One on one teaching with crappy teachers does not create good outcomes, so smaller class size is not necessarily a good thing.

eppur_se_muova

(36,281 posts)
3. If you have a finite amount of funding, you have to prioritize ...
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 10:43 AM
Feb 2015

the message here is that small class size should be lower priority than high teacher quality.

roody

(10,849 posts)
7. This is a good argument for a unionized labor force with a negotiated contract.
Thu Feb 5, 2015, 12:48 AM
Feb 2015

Better teachers do not cost more than less good teachers, except that experience makes one a more skilled (better) teacher, and a good contract pays for experience.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
4. In addition to all of the above can be included the deliberate falsification of info and facts by
Wed Feb 4, 2015, 06:08 PM
Feb 2015

Corporations, Fox News ...etc... regarding science, climate, general information ... all for
the sake of extra profit. They really don't give a damn what happens to their own country,
as long as they can make a bigger profit.

















Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Seven big myths about top...