Why are tyrants afraid of laughter?
Last week, a Malaysian cartoonist was charged with sedition over posting tweets criticising the ruling coalition. Zulkiflee Anwar Alhaque, better known as Zunar, was charged with nine counts of sedition over a series of tweets condemning the country's judiciary. The charges came "amid a widening government crackdown on opposition politicians and the media using the colonial-era law", and was "slammed by critics as a move to stifle freedom of expression".
What's the matter with these politicians and tyrants? Can't they take a joke? Why are powerful generals, murderous tyrants, and stuck-up theocrats so incensed when someone makes fun of them?
"A Turkish court has sentenced two cartoonists to 11 months and 20 days in jail for insulting President Recep Tayyip Erdogan." Going to jail for drawing a few lines that may, if they are any good, succeed in making people chuckle?
Perhaps the most famous case of a cartoonist being savagely attacked by a ruling tyrant because of his courage and imagination is that of the Syrian cartoonist Ali Ferzat. Ferzat's brother, Asaad, told Al Jazeera that "his brother was kidnapped at 5am by five gunmen from outside his home and taken to the airport road. 'He was savagely beaten, they broke his fingers and told him not to satirise Syria's leaders'." Ferzat survived the attack and managed to draw a picture of himself giving Assad the middle finger.
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2015/04/tyrants-afraid-laughter-150412060406048.html
rock
(13,218 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)A series of mysterious murders takes place in a monastery. It turns out, the old blind monk has been killing people to cover up the existence of a hidden library and especially of a certain book therein: It was an old, greek book on the topic of comedy. And it led the reader to the conclusion that it would be okay to laugh about God.
Laughter is the opposite of fear. And if you don't fear him, the tyrant fears you.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Laughter is a very democratic thing.
bvf
(6,604 posts)And an even better novel.
on point
(2,506 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,185 posts)The fear is what they live for.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)It makes them feel big.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The refusal to take a leader seriously is even worse than opposing him
MBS
(9,688 posts)IMHO-tyrants,autocrats, dictators and bullies of all sorts are insecure almost by definition.As they say, "Uneasy lies the crown"
Nay
(12,051 posts)but not take it. Bullies, IOW.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)and to attack critics even on epistemological grounds ("everyone laugh at the stupid peasant who can't see or remember straight! that's no massacre, it's just a military drill or something"
Yes. It is using their own weapons against them.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)but again we can't just complacently assume that laughter and drawings and posters are inherently "weapons of the weak," as virtuous by their very nature
bemildred
(90,061 posts)They are not the only guys with a bullhorn now, anybody can talk. Big shots can be de-humanized and denigrated too. People can say mean things.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)the old saying is that technology's neutral, but I disagree: its users are definitely responsible, but its uses basically count as its purpose--even The Button is meant to be pushed
the Internet's something that lets you both out gays and arrange revolutions, reveal rank corruption and make Stasi officers green with envy
everyone's choice is whether to laugh at those above or those below
bemildred
(90,061 posts)And yeah, whatever technology is, it is not neutral, technology is power.