Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The Slave-State Origins of Modern Gun Rights
Gun-rights advocates have waged a relentless battle to gut what remains of Americas lax and inadequate gun regulations. In the name of the Second Amendment, they are challenging the constitutionality of state and municipal may issue regulations that restrict the right to carry weapons in public to persons who can show a compelling need to be armed. A few courts are starting to take these challenges seriously. But what the advocates do not acknowledgeand some courts seem not to understandis that their arguments are grounded in precedent unique to the violent world of the slaveholding South.Claims that may issue regulations are unconstitutional have been rejected by most federal appellate courtsthat is, until last year, when a court in California broke ranks and struck down San Diegos public-carry regulation. This year, a court did the same with the District of Columbias rewritten handgun ordinance. Both decisions face further review from appellate courts, and perhaps also by the Supreme Court. If the justices buy this expansive view of the Second Amendment, laws in states such as New York, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Hawaii with the strictest public carry regulationsand some of the lowest rates of gun homicidewill be voided as unconstitutional ...
The opinion most enthusiastically embraced by public-carry advocates is Nunn v. State, a state-court decision written by Georgia Chief Justice Joseph Henry Lumpkin in 1846. As a jurist, Lumpkin was a champion both of slavery and of the Southern code of honor. Perhaps, not by coincidence, Nunn was the first case in which a court struck down a gun law on the basis of the Second Amendment. The U.S. Supreme Court cited Nunn in District of Columbia v. Heller, its landmark 2008 decision holding, for the first time in over 200 years, that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a handgun in the home for self-defense. Why courts or gun-rights advocates think Lumpkins view of the right to bear arms provides a solid foundation for modern firearms jurisprudence is puzzling. Slavery, honor, and their associated violence spawned a unique weapons culture. One of its defining features was a permissive view of white citizens right to carry weapons in public. ...
In the North, publicly carrying concealable weapons was much less popular than in the South. In 1845, New York jurist William Jay contrasted those portions of our country where it is supposed essential to personal safety to go armed with pistols and bowie-knives with the north and east, where we are unprovided with such facilities for taking life. Indeed, public-carry restrictions were embraced across the region. In 1836, the respected Massachusetts jurist Peter Oxenbridge Thacher instructed a jury that in Massachusetts no person may go armed with a dirk, dagger, sword, pistol, or other offensive and dangerous weapon, without reasonable cause to apprehend an assault or violence to his person, family, or property. Judge Thachers charge was celebrated in the contemporary press as sensible, practical, and sage. Massachusetts was not unusual in broadly restricting public carry. Wisconsin, Maine, Michigan, Virginia, Minnesota, Oregon, and Pennsylvania passed laws modeled on the public-carry restriction in Massachusetts ...
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/the-origins-of-public-carry-jurisprudence-in-the-slave-south/407809/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 770 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post