Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 08:58 PM Nov 2015

How can Philip Morris sue Uruguay over its tobacco laws?

Monday, November 16, 2015

When the architects of the international order that took shape after the second world war created the United Nations, they gave the organization a lofty goal: “Save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” Through the UN charter – akin to a world constitution – solemnly adopted in 1945 in San Francisco, they also said they were “determined to establish conditions under which justice and respect for the obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law can be maintained”.

Since then and in line with that vow, the UN has put on the world stage not only the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but also legally binding instruments, including 10 core human rights conventions and countless declarations and resolutions.

But now more than ever, one single mechanism – the little-known investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) – threatens the existing system of justice, the concept of checks and balances, the very core of the rule of law. Its implications for the respect of human rights around the world are devastating. If it is allowed to continue to exist, it will hijack the dreams of a just international order born out of the second world war. It must be abolished because it undermines fundamental principles of the UN, state sovereignty, democracy and the rule of law. Far from contributing to human rights and development, the international investment regime and ISDS have resulted in growing inequality among states and within them. Article 103 of the UN charter is clear: in case of conflict between the charter and any other agreements, including ISDS, it is the UN charter that prevails.

The ISDS mechanism is a unique privatised system of arbitration, often buried in bilateral investment treaties and multilateral trade agreements (such as Nafta and TTIP). It grants an investor the right to use private dispute settlement proceedings against a foreign government, yet governments cannot sue the investors. The system is neither transparent nor accountable and often results in aberrant judgments without the possibility of appeal. Over the years, it has led to inconsistent, unpredictable and arbitrary awards contrary to national and international public order.

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/16/philip-morris-uruguay-tobacco-isds-human-rights

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How can Philip Morris sue Uruguay over its tobacco laws? (Original Post) Jefferson23 Nov 2015 OP
you ain't seen nothing til the TPP is passed thanks to our president and corporations nt msongs Nov 2015 #1
Because corporations view themselves as equal to countries Lithos Nov 2015 #2
Yes, precisely. n/t Jefferson23 Nov 2015 #4
because corporations view the world and it's people hopemountain Nov 2015 #3
Because Corporations have human rights and people are just another commodity to profit from. marble falls Nov 2015 #5

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
3. because corporations view the world and it's people
Tue Nov 17, 2015, 09:19 PM
Nov 2015

as their oysters on their heaping plates of resources to gluttonize, exploit and feed their bottomless pits of greed.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»How can Philip Morris sue...