Chomsky writes, as world public opinion becomes a ‘second superpower’
Who rules the world? America is no longer the obvious answerNoam Chomsky for TomDispatch
When we ask who rules the world? we commonly adopt the standard convention that the actors in world affairs are states, primarily the great powers, and we consider their decisions and the relations among them. That is not wrong. But we would do well to keep in mind that this level of abstraction can also be highly misleading.
States, of course, have complex internal structures, and the choices and decisions of the political leadership are heavily influenced by internal concentrations of power, while the general population is often marginalized. That is true even for the more democratic societies, and obviously for others. We cannot gain a realistic understanding of who rules the world while ignoring the masters of mankind, as Adam Smith called them: in his day, the merchants and manufacturers of England; in ours, multinational conglomerates, huge financial institutions, retail empires and the like.
Still following Smith, it is also wise to attend to the vile maxim to which the masters of mankind are dedicated: All for ourselves and nothing for other people a doctrine known otherwise as bitter and incessant class war, often one-sided, much to the detriment of the people of the home country and the world.
In the contemporary global order, the institutions of the masters hold enormous power, not only in the international arena but also within their home states, on which they rely to protect their power and to provide economic support by a wide variety of means.
When we consider the role of the masters of mankind, we turn to such state policy priorities of the moment as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, one of the investor-rights agreements mislabeled free-trade agreements in propaganda and commentary. They are negotiated in secret, apart from the hundreds of corporate lawyers and lobbyists writing the crucial details. The intention is to have them adopted in good Stalinist style with fast track procedures designed to block discussion and allow only the choice of yes or no (hence yes).
The designers regularly do quite well, not surprisingly. People are incidental, with the consequences one might anticipate.
The second superpower
The neoliberal programs of the past generation have concentrated wealth and power in far fewer hands while undermining functioning democracy, but they have aroused opposition as well, most prominently in Latin America but also in the centers of global power.
The European Union (EU), one of the more promising developments of the post-world war II period, has been tottering because of the harsh effect of the policies of austerity during recession, condemned even by the economists of the International Monetary Fund (if not the IMFs political actors).
Democracy has been undermined as decision-making shifted to the Brussels bureaucracy, with the northern banks casting their shadow over their ........
snip
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/09/noam-chomsky-who-rules-the-world-us-foregin-policy
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Is telling the truth about something, as distasteful and harmful to so many milliions of human beings as it may be, 'hating America'?
No. It's hating the foreign policies of many of us that have caused all this. But you're/we're the victims, eh?
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Really not interested in what you're interested in.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)the Russians a pass. NATO has protected you for decades. You are ungrateful.
polly7
(20,582 posts)We did fine. (My ancestors' families took part in that ........ woot!! How do you like that?)
Russia has just offered aid in fighting the fires around Fort McMurray and other spots that have lit up ............ decent of them, imhfo.
My family fought and died against the Nazi's years before your gov't was even interested. So take your arrogant crap and you know what ....
NATO is turning into a tool for corporations and the IMF and World Bank. I don't like it. I don't like paying to kill innocent people.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Noam Chomsky
is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, logician, social critic, and political activist. Sometimes described as "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy, and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He has spent more than half a century at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he is Institute Professor Emeritus, and is the author of over 100 books on topics such as linguistics, war, politics, and mass media. Ideologically, he aligns with anarcho-syndicalism and libertarian socialism.
Born
Avram Noam Chomsky
December 7, 1928 (age 87)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Born Avram Noam Chomsky
December 7, 1928 (age 87)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.
Fields: Linguistics, analytic philosophy, cognitive science, intellectual history, political criticism
Institutions:
MIT (1955-present)
Institute for Advanced Study (1958-1959)
Alma mater
University of Pennsylvania (B.A., 1949; M.A., 1951; Ph.D., 1955)
Harvard Society of Fellows (19511955)
Thesis Transformational Analysis (1955)
Notes
He has been described as "arguably the most important intellectual alive".[22]
Avram Noam Chomsky (/ˈnoʊm ˈtʃɒmski/; born December 7, 1928) is an American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, logician, social critic, and political activist. Sometimes described as "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy, and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He has spent more than half a century at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he is Institute Professor Emeritus, and is the author of over 100 books on topics such as linguistics, war, politics, and mass media. Ideologically, he aligns with anarcho-syndicalism and libertarian socialism.
Born to middle-class Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. At the age of sixteen he began studies at the University of Pennsylvania, taking courses in linguistics, mathematics, and philosophy. He married fellow linguist Carol Schatz in 1949. From 1951 to 1955 he was appointed to Harvard University's Society of Fellows, where he developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he was awarded his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, in 1957 emerging as a significant figure in the field of linguistics for his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which laid the basis for the scientific study of language, while from 1958 to 1959 he was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He is credited as the creator or co-creator of the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of behaviorism, being particularly critical of the work of B. F. Skinner.
An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky attracted widespread public attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and landed a place on President Richard Nixon's Enemies List. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the Linguistics Wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later co-wrote Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, an analysis articulating the propaganda model of media criticism, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. However, his defense of unconditional freedom of speech including that of Holocaust denial generated significant controversy in what came to be known as the Faurisson affair of the early 1980s. Following his retirement from active teaching, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the War on Terror and supporting the Occupy movement.
Chomsky's work has influenced a wide array of academic fields, with Chomsky himself being one of the single most cited scholars in human history. He is widely recognized as a paradigm shifter who helped spark a major revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. In addition to his continued scholarly research, he remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, neoliberalism and contemporary state capitalism, the IsraeliPalestinian conflict, and mainstream news media. His ideas in these areas have proved highly significant within the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements, but have also drawn criticism, with some accusing Chomsky of anti-Americanism and alleging that he is sympathetic to terrorism and genocide denial.
United States foreign policy
Chomsky believes that the basic principle of the foreign policy of the United States is the establishment of "open societies" which are economically and politically controlled by the U.S. and where U.S.-based businesses can prosper.[183] He believes that 'official,' sanctioned historical accounts of U.S. and British imperialism have consistently whitewashed these nations' actions in order to present them as having benevolent motives in either spreading democracy or, in older instances spreading Christianity; criticizing these accounts, he seeks to correct them.[184] Prominent examples that he regularly cites are the actions of the British Empire in India and Africa, and the actions of the U.S. in Vietnam, the Philippines, Latin America, and the Middle East.[184]
Part of the reason why he focuses most of his criticism on the U.S. is because during his lifetime the country has militarily and economically dominated the world, and because its liberal democratic electoral system allows for the citizenry to exert an influence on government policy.[185] His hope is that by spreading awareness of the negative impact that imperialism has on the populations affected by it, he can sway the population of the U.S. and other countries into opposing government policies that are imperialist in their nature.[184] He urges people to criticize the motivations, decisions, and actions of their governments, to accept responsibility for one's own thoughts and actions, and to apply the same standards to others as one would apply to oneself.[186]
Capitalism, socialism, and the United States
In his youth, Chomsky developed a dislike of capitalism and the selfish pursuit of material advancement.[187] At the same time he developed a disdain for the authoritarian attempts to establish a socialist society, as represented by the likes of Stalinism.[188] Chomsky believes that libertarian socialism should "properly be regarded as the inheritor of the liberal ideas of the Enlightenment,"[189] arguing that his ideological position revolves around "nourishing the libertarian and creative character of the human being."[190] He has stated his opposition to ruling elites, among them institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and GATT.[191]
Chomsky highlights that since the 1970s, the U.S. has become increasingly economically unequal as a result of the repeal of various financial regulations and the rescindment of the Bretton Woods financial control agreements.[185] He characterizes the U.S. as a de facto one-party state, viewing both the Republican Party and Democratic Party as manifestations of a single "Business Party" controlled by corporate and financial interests.[192] Chomsky highlights that within Western capitalist liberal democracies, at least 80% of the population has no control over economic decisions, which are instead in the hands of a management class and ultimately controlled by a small, wealthy elite.[193]
Noting that this economic system is firmly entrenched and difficult to overthrow, he believes that change is possible through the organized co-operation of large numbers of people who understand the problem and know how they want to re-organize the economy in a more equitable way.[194] Although acknowledging that corporate domination of media and government stifle any significant change to this system, he sees reason for optimism, citing the historical examples of the social rejection of slavery as immoral, the advances in women's rights, and the forcing of government to justify invasions to illustrate how change is possible.[185] He views violent revolution to overthrow a government as a last result to be avoided if possible, citing the example of historical revolutions where the population's welfare has worsened as a result of the upheaval.[193]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky
(bbm).
Then there's you .. seemingly, a supporter of everything he's against. I see why you dislike him so much.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)NewImproved Deal
(534 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)even if he is a foreigner..............LOL!!!!