Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2017, 07:01 PM Feb 2017

Some bombshells might drop on Scott Pruitt next week. The Senate confirmed him anyway

Democrats and environmentalists have put up a stink over thousands of unreleased emails between newly-confirmed EPA administrator Scott Pruitt and fossil fuel interests. Pruitt was ordered by a judge on Thursday to release those emails, which were requested two years ago by a progressive watchdog group under a Public Records Act request.

Those emails could show any number of things—including nothing. But they were requested in the first place because Pruitt has a history of sketchy emails. In 2014, the New York Times found what they called “an unprecedented, secretive alliance” between Pruitt’s office (he was previously the attorney general for Oklahoma) and Devon Energy, one of Oklahoma’s biggest oil and gas companies. Pruitt had apparently allowed lawyers for Devon to write a letter to the EPA and put it on Oklahoma attorney general letterhead. What’s more, Pruitt regularly accepted political contributions from fossil fuel companies “within days of taking official actions that support those companies,” ABC News found.

The Center for Media and Democracy, which filed the records request, suspects the emails could contain more evidence of collusion between Pruitt and oil and gas interests. But Pruitt does not have to release those emails until Tuesday. That’s why on Friday morning, Democrats said they would attempt to delay Pruitt’s confirmation hearing until next week. In a press conference, they noted that it might even be good for Republicans to hold off, just in case there is something particularly scandalous in those emails. And they chastised Republicans for ignoring Pruitt’s emails while spending the presidential campaign focused on Hillary Clinton’s private email server. “It is the absolute height of hypocrisy,” Chuck Schumer said.

https://newrepublic.com/minutes/140741/bombshells-might-drop-scott-pruitt-next-week-senate-confirmed-anyway

Mitch McConnell, however, said he would not allow a delay. Asked by a reporter to explain, he answered succinctly: “Because I choose not to.”

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some bombshells might drop on Scott Pruitt next week. The Senate confirmed him anyway (Original Post) BeckyDem Feb 2017 OP
Let them Afromania Feb 2017 #1
Yes. It is bad, no matter how you look at it. BeckyDem Feb 2017 #2

Afromania

(2,768 posts)
1. Let them
Fri Feb 17, 2017, 07:15 PM
Feb 2017

Right at this moment there isn't shit we can do outside of protesting and keeping the eyes of the world on them. Let them dig their graves so that when the time comes, and its coming shortly, we can walk right over them into the future. You know, barring the absolute end of the earth due to messed up "weather".

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Some bombshells might dro...