McMaster Has the Islamophobes Worried. Good.
Trumps new national security adviser can be a powerful counterweight the the baleful influence of Steve Bannon.
By WILLIAM MCCANTS February 23, 2017
When Americas most influential Islamophobes are upset, you know the president made a good choice. Score one from the swamp, whined Robert Spencer upon hearing the news that Donald Trump appointed Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster to be his new national security adviser. Spencer makes a living scaring Americans about the dangers of Muslim soccer moms. John Bolton lost out to this guy? sputtered his frequent partner in whine, Pamela Geller, who scoffed at the general for saying, Every time you disrespect an Iraqi, youre working for the enemy.
The Islamophobes are not wrong to sense that McMaster will be hostile to their worldview, according to those who know him best. McMaster spent much of his career fighting and winning wars in the Middle East, which required him to know the local cultures and treat Muslims like humans rather than scripturally programmed robots. He absolutely does not view Islam as the enemy, said Pete Mansoor, who served with McMaster in Iraq. He understands that the world is not one dimensional, that the Muslim world is not one dimensional, said John Nagl, who also served with McMaster. In other words, the complicated causes of terrorism require complicated solutions.
McMasters nuanced views will likely be at odds with those of the presidents chief political strategist, Steve Bannon, and the other members of Bannons so-called Strategic Initiatives Group, a policymaking body he co-leads with the presidents son-in-law and chief of staff. Bannon believes the teachings of Islam and a supine West are primarily to blame for jihadist terrorism, as does his counterterrorism adviser Sebastian Gorka. Both scoff at the idea that jihadism arises from a confluence of factors, most of which are not religious. This is the famous approach that says it is all so nuanced and complicated, Gorka told the Washington Post. This is what I completely jettison.
McMasters disgraced predecessor, Michael Flynn, agreed with the Bannonites and was disdainful of the intelligence communitys analysis, which he believed ignored the religious motives of jihadists in order to please President Obama. I served in the State Department when Flynn was still in government and, having seen some of the same analysis Flynn saw, I can say that the intelligence community did not ignore religion; it just didnt inflate it as the primary driver of jihadist terrorism. The intelligence community was also careful to disaggregate jihadist groups according to their competing interests and to distinguish those groups from non-violent Islamists. With McMasters appointment, such analysis is now likely to find a sympathetic ear in the White House.
more
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/02/mcmaster-has-the-islamophobes-worried-good-214815
Eliot Rosewater
(31,131 posts)This one might be preferable to that one, but still.
njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)With the entire cabinet controlled by special interest groups the generals seem like a sane alternative
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)Drums beat for war..chaos here at home - ever vigilant..