Mon Jul 2, 2012, 08:38 AM

(in one chart) No, ‘Obamacare’ isn’t ‘the largest tax increase

Since the Supreme Court decision, Republicans have been calling the Affordable Care Act “the largest tax increase in the history of the world.” Politifact rates this false. Kevin Drum’s got a table of the 15 significant tax increases since 1950, and the Affordable Care Act, which amounts to a tax increase of 0.49 percent of GDP, comes in 10th. Austin Frakt took Drum’s table and made a chart:

So no, the Affordable Care Act isn’t the “biggest tax hike in history.” It’s not even the biggest tax hike in the past 60 years. Or 50 years. Or 30 years. Or 20 years.

See chart at:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/07/02/no-obamacare-isnt-the-largest-tax-increase-in-the-history-of-the-world-in-one-chart/

1 replies, 642 views

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

1 replies	Author	Time	Post
(in one chart) No, ‘Obamacare’ isn’t ‘the largest tax increase (Original post)	ohgeewhiz	Jul 2012	OP
Tax, defined simply as what's collected by the government.	Igel	Jul 2012	#1

Response to ohgeewhiz (Original post)

Mon Jul 2, 2012, 12:40 PM

Igel (17,560 posts)

1. Tax, defined simply as what's collected by the government.

It's nice to be clear, since "tax" is also taken to mean, in a wider sense, as any money that you're obligated or "strongly encouraged" to spend as a result of government action.

So the increase in health care costs because of uninsured ER (and other) patients has been termed a "hidden tax." In some cases it's called that because it's an odd cost of doing business, not one that directly tied to doing business and voluntary.

In other cases, it's because a certain class of care givers are required by law to provide the care. In a real sense it doesn't matter if the government collects the funds directly or not if it's requiring that they be a part of doing business. It's like having a business required to put in time in record keeping for the government--it's not exactly voluntary and it's a cost of doing business, but not one that's necessary, in the strictest sense, for doing business.

The details of the definition concern me less than knowing what the definition in play is, and that it's a constant throughout the argument or text.

So in the narrowest sense, the tax from the ACA isn't all that large. Can't find if it's the same, in terms of GDP, how it stacks up against the 1937 tax increase.

Reply to this post