Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,026 posts)
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 11:21 PM Aug 2012

As Restaurants Cut Salt, Some See Reasons to Pass

It was a slightly curious gesture: last week, Boston Market, the national chain of rotisserie chicken restaurants, removed the salt shakers from its tables, replacing them with small placards — tucked next to the pepper shakers — promoting the company’s interest in reducing sodium.

As a marketing strategy, it was clever, earning the 476-restaurant franchise business more publicity than its popular macaroni and cheese ever could. As a health measure, however, it was unlikely to do more than to make customers shrug and to fire up the longstanding debate over whether people who do not have high blood pressure truly need to limit their salt intake.

“We are removing the temptation to put salt on food right away without even tasting it,” said George Michel, chief executive of Boston Market, in a telephone interview. “As part of our social responsibility and promise to deliver wholesome food, we wanted to take a bold step like this.”

Sodium reduction has lately become a culinary cause célèbre. Subway, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Burger King and Taco Bell, as well as food manufacturers like Campbell Soup and PepsiCo, have all publicly vowed to produce lower-sodium products. (To a degree: last year, Campbell decided to add sodium back into some of its soups after sales began to slide.)

Critics say the precautions are getting ahead of the science. Unlike tobacco, alcohol and other long-corroborated health risks, sodium remains a topic of sometimes angry debate among researchers. There is no evidence that average people — those without hypertension — need less sodium, critics say, and too little of the essential nutrient could be as dangerous as too much.

full: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/science/some-restaurants-reduce-salt-but-critics-call-moves-unnecessary.html?pagewanted=all

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As Restaurants Cut Salt, Some See Reasons to Pass (Original Post) alp227 Aug 2012 OP
I miss GP6971 Aug 2012 #1
Boston Market's food already has too much salt in it. Manifestor_of_Light Aug 2012 #2
Salt should be on the table greymattermom Aug 2012 #3
I Have Kept Asking About This On the Road Aug 2012 #4

GP6971

(31,163 posts)
1. I miss
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 11:28 PM
Aug 2012

Boston Market. They pulled out of our area of WA years ago. Olf course now I look at the company's affiliation which I don't what it is. Example......go to Lowes over Home Depot....lesser of the 2 evils.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
2. Boston Market's food already has too much salt in it.
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 11:37 PM
Aug 2012

I wish they would stop putting so much salt in it when it's cooked.

I use sea salt and don't like a whole lot of salt anyway, and I have hypertension.



greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
3. Salt should be on the table
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 08:25 AM
Aug 2012

So anyone who wants it can use it. I can't eat at a lot of restaurants because there's too much salt in the food. You can put it in but you can't take it out.

On the Road

(20,783 posts)
4. I Have Kept Asking About This
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 10:49 AM
Aug 2012

and have had a hard time getting a satisfying answer:

There is no evidence that average people — those without hypertension — need less sodium, critics say...

I keep hearing how salt in general is bad for you. Have not been able to find out why other than exacerbating a condition that most people don't have.

It seems increasingly that nutritional and health information has a manichean or moralistic element to it, in which things are "bad" or "good" regardless of individual needs and risks. Some people are allergic to wheat, so now gluten-free products are healthier for you. MSG gives some people headaches, so now MSG is "bad for you." Many people consume too much fat, so fat-free products are "good for you."

It's sometimes hard to dive below the generalizations and find out if there's any actual substance there.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»As Restaurants Cut Salt, ...