Video & Multimedia
Related: About this forumThom Hartmann: Everything U Know Is Wrong: Who Really Killed Kennedy?
Lamar Waldron, The Hidden History of the JFK Assassination, joins Thom.
The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann on RT TV & FSTV "live" 9pm and 11pm check www.thomhartmann.com/tv for local listings
mother earth
(6,002 posts)discussion.
Truly those who believe Oswald did the crime are in the minority...now someone will come out to trash TH & guest,
no doubt.
villager
(26,001 posts)...on issue after issue, yet imagine themselves as part of a virtual "underground..."
mother earth
(6,002 posts)an overgrown spy and even their own are calling them out on it (Wm. Binney).
What ever happened to question everything?
villager
(26,001 posts)...all the pronouncements from our most powerful cabals are correct!"
mother earth
(6,002 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)No, I realize that "undergrounds" of all sort -- artistic, political, et al -- get co-opted eventually.
Just kind of breathtaking how pronounced that affect is here, over so many posts...
classof56
(5,376 posts)Which--funny thing--happened the day I turned 31.
Peace!
longship
(40,416 posts)What's all this gum flapping about Allen Dulles? He wasn't at CIA since November 29, 1961.
Geez! If one is going to have a conspiracy theory, at least people should bother to get their facts straight.
villager
(26,001 posts)Better luck next time!
longship
(40,416 posts)And so were many others. If one is going to spin a JFK conspiracy around Dulles, one is going to have to do better than that.
Of course, it will have to compete the JFK assassination conspiracies centering around:
* The CIA: (Dulles being out at the time)
* The FBI
* The Mafia
* Castro
* Krushchev
* The KGB
* Allen Dulles
* Geo HW Bush
* Yosemite Sam (no doubt) Might as well be Scrooge McDuck.
Note that many of these are mutually exclusive, yet nearly all the JFK conspiracy theorists bring out the same list. In other words, they are called conspiracy theorists but they have no cogent single theory except to deny the so-called "official" explanation, which I suspect is their sole goal.
Well, if they want to be taken seriously and not soon to be relegated back to the DU Creative Speculation Forum, they're going to have to do come up with a single explanation based on positive evidence. Otherwise, they are wasting everybody's time here. Negative and often long ago debunked sniping at the Oswald case is not going to help.
I am done with this crazy thread and all similar ones.
villager
(26,001 posts)don't want your time "wasted" in repeated attempts to condescend to the rest of us!
Happy threading elsewhere!
longship
(40,416 posts)Those that see history as a series of facts see one thing. Those that see only the anomalies inevitably see something else. The latter is unfortunate and rarely finds anything but the facts.
Too bad that.
villager
(26,001 posts)Especially in response to those anomalies.
So your threat to leave this thread was just a hollow one, I see...
tomp
(9,512 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)I just came from another thread full of them.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)It seems that because they know little about JFK, and know little about the assassination - they assume the dominant MSM that Oswald was the killer or sole killer is true. Their lack of knowledge and intellectual curiosity is stunning.
Of course these are the same young people who are only too willing to give all of their personal information to the government.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)One person really got into it on one thread, telling everyone it was "not important", what's the difference, etc.
I basically said "Look...You're probably younger and just don't give a shit, and that's okay, just don't go telling the
rest of us who DO remember and felt that trauma and pain how WE should feel or what we should be interested in".
I definitely get your point about younger people willing to spill it all...I don't even really like facebook. My niece,
on the other hand, can hardly take a piss without needing to tell everyone about it...I don't get that need to be in CONSTANT
communication.
villager
(26,001 posts)What's with the particular personality matrix that takes Allen Dulles at his word?
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)I guess I am one of the slower ones, like our Warren Commission apologists here. I vividly remember hearing news of a big rally in the Pacific Northwest. The year (or even the era) escapes me, but I guess it must have been mid-90s. This was a large organized protest against the incessant creep if global corporatism -- a rally against the unchecked power of these multi-national corporations that are accountable to nobody.
At the time, I was just like these not-terribly-aware folks who say we-mustn't-ask-any-questions-because-Oswald-was-a-solitary-perp-just-a-disturbed-guy-and-that-is-all-there-is-to-it-you-crazy-conspiracy-theorist.
I clearly recall being taken aback by these "crazies" in Seattle or Portland, wherever it was. What are they so unhappy about? I buy my gas from Exxon. Exxon seems OK to me.
That was the beginning of my education about how the world actually is. In my defense, information wasn't as available back then. The propaganda covered virtually 100% of the available media. We speak harshly of the MSM today, but really, they have always been agents of the propaganda factory. On this anniversary of the JFK assassination, it was sad to see some of those old broadcasts with none less than Walter Cronkite hauling water for the Warren Commission.
Today, we have much greater access to information globally. But it is a polluted well. You have to use judgment in weighing all this information. And that, in a nutshell is what is so very wrong about this business that we should not question __________ (fill in the blank. The Warren commission. The NSA. The PTT. etc.)
I would simply tell our friends whose understanding of the world is less evolved, Stop criticizing those who are farther down the path than you are. Question and learn. The world is a much more complicated place than you may be comfortable with right now. But honestly, you will be in a better place once you have a better understanding how this place operates. It can be pretty ugly and depressing. But as I see it, ignorance is even more depressing.
canoeist52
(2,282 posts)"The world is a much more complicated place than you may be comfortable with right now."
I think you hit on the reason for the angry out-of-proportion push-back; "Fear"
Because it's disorienting to have one's life-long beliefs challenged.
Great post -should be an OP.
navarth
(5,927 posts)I always will kick for Thom Hartmann.
eggplant
(3,911 posts)This clip didn't actually say anything except that "all this is in the book!"
And because of this, I have to discount the value of the clip. Not the content of the book, which I haven't read, just the clip itself.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)When someone on his show asked Thom Hartmann about the book that he supposedly help write, Thom Hartmann played dumb. I don't think Thom Hartmann really believes the B/S in the book that Lamar Waldron probably mostly wrote himself.