Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Video & Multimedia

marmar

(77,088 posts) Sat Apr 7, 2012, 07:16 AM Apr 2012

The Case Against the NDAA: Lawyer for Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky & Daniel Ellsberg

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Case Against the NDAA: Lawyer for Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky & Daniel Ellsberg (Original Post) marmar Apr 2012 OP

More evidence that the best we can say about Pres. Obama is that truth2power Apr 2012 #1

This is the exact concerns I was trying to voice on this board-and other boards- BUT shout me down Justice wanted Apr 2012 #2

Very clear compelling explanation. Thanks. (nt) enough Apr 2012 #3

truth2power

(8,219 posts)

1. More evidence that the best we can say about Pres. Obama is that

Reply to marmar (Original post)

Sat Apr 7, 2012, 10:53 AM

Apr 2012

the other guy is worse. Ugh!

Feel free to comment on why Obama should be supported for signing this. I am appalled!

Justice wanted

(2,657 posts)

2. This is the exact concerns I was trying to voice on this board-and other boards- BUT shout me down

Reply to marmar (Original post)

Sat Apr 7, 2012, 11:09 AM

Apr 2012

saying Obama wouldn't do that to citizens. Or calls me a troll. This is a very REAL concern. It is before a judge now who asking the same questions a lot of us have asked in the past.

WE need to be more aware of WHAT is happening not just say ____ ______ wouldn't do that to us. Whoever it is Not Just President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell etc.

We have screamed about back room dealings done by both Republicans and Democrats.

We need to be a little more observant when these laws come up.

enough

(13,262 posts)

3. Very clear compelling explanation. Thanks. (nt)

Reply to marmar (Original post)

Sat Apr 7, 2012, 12:24 PM

Apr 2012

Reply to this discussion