Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:50 PM May 2016

Nuclear Waste: Drone buzzes Fukushima temporary storage facility



Millions of tons of radioactive soil and debris can be seen packed in black bags in a temporary storage site at Tomioka, Fukushima prefecture.

Wow. How long do those plastic bags have to be stored?

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nuclear Waste: Drone buzzes Fukushima temporary storage facility (Original Post) Generic Other May 2016 OP
Forever. The waste never dies, yet the bags deteriorate. We are having YUGE ViseGrip May 2016 #1
Oh, c'mon now. You're exaggerating. Old Crow May 2016 #7
You're almost as far off FBaggins May 2016 #20
Very interesting. Old Crow May 2016 #21
That's primarily what you get from a meltdown. FBaggins May 2016 #22
Thank you! Old Crow May 2016 #24
Mutated eight-legged pig from Chernobyl Baobab May 2016 #25
I don't think anyone here is trying to minimize the severity of what happened ... Old Crow May 2016 #28
Thats not true, there are frequent spikes where the radiation will go very high, that indicates Baobab May 2016 #29
Well, I'm happy to learn more. Old Crow May 2016 #30
Links please. FBaggins May 2016 #31
Eight-legged pigs that are not from Chernobyl FBaggins May 2016 #32
Thank You For Sharing The Truth cantbeserious May 2016 #2
Holy fuck! Pharaoh May 2016 #3
no, it's RT uhnope May 2016 #10
Google images show these piles all over Fukushima Generic Other May 2016 #11
lol here's some more google images for you uhnope May 2016 #12
My family lives 100 kilometers from Fukushima Generic Other May 2016 #14
if you follow the thread uhnope May 2016 #17
Like I said, I know the Japanese authorities are removing contaminated topsoil Generic Other May 2016 #18
that's cool. uhnope May 2016 #19
Sorry for what you and your family are dealing with. 7wo7rees May 2016 #26
It's always a good idea to doubt anything you read on RT... FBaggins May 2016 #23
It's always a good idea to doubt anything you read on CNN... Agony May 2016 #27
false equivalence much? uhnope May 2016 #33
It's amazing how much damage humans can do. And it's not like we don't know. C Moon May 2016 #4
... and, it's amazing ... Jopin Klobe May 2016 #5
+1000GB C Moon May 2016 #9
What happens when the next tsunami hits? How long to migrate to Puget Sound, or Catalina, or Panama? Ford_Prefect May 2016 #6
Well if it washed it all out to sea they would not have to worry zeemike May 2016 #8
I live by Puget Sound and worry about it too Generic Other May 2016 #16
They haven't dealt with the damaged reactor yet. mjvpi May 2016 #13
The Japanese government suppresses information Generic Other May 2016 #15
 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
1. Forever. The waste never dies, yet the bags deteriorate. We are having YUGE
Thu May 5, 2016, 11:53 PM
May 2016

problems with storage of waste from this type of energy.

Old Crow

(2,212 posts)
7. Oh, c'mon now. You're exaggerating.
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:40 AM
May 2016

Nuclear power plant waste is dangerous for only 24,400 years. That's a mere 12,000 human generations.

FBaggins

(26,757 posts)
20. You're almost as far off
Sat May 7, 2016, 05:12 PM
May 2016

The waste that we're talking about is almost exclusively cesium (134 and 137). Their half lives are only 2 and 30 years respectively.

So 80% of the 134 is already gone.

Old Crow

(2,212 posts)
21. Very interesting.
Sat May 7, 2016, 05:28 PM
May 2016

I certainly hope you're correct. Do you have a link to back this up? Or can you give a little more info? It's a terribly important topic and I'd like to be better informed. Thanks.

FBaggins

(26,757 posts)
22. That's primarily what you get from a meltdown.
Sat May 7, 2016, 05:53 PM
May 2016

If you have a meltdown in a BWR or PWR, there are three primary radioactive emissions.

The first are the noble gasses. They're incredibly radioactive, but thus have short half-lives. They're usually ignored because they're lighter than air and don't react with anything else (i.e., they won't come down with rain), so they tend not to result in any danger.

Next you have the radioiodine (I131). That's usually the most significant health risk (and why thyroid cancers are the most common health impact), but with a half-life of eight days, it's gone in a few weeks... so there wouldn't be any of that in those bags either.

The longest-lasting release of consequence is cesium. Both iodine and cesium are "volatile" at meltdown temperatures and turn to gas (And thus are released in venting the reactor containment). Cesium has a short half-live when compared to most parts of reactor fuel (uranium/plutonium), but long when compared to the other things that an event like Fukushima might release.

Here's a resource

Note that things are very different in a case like Chernobyl - where physical pieces of the core were released when it burned in the open air. Very tiny amounts (milligrams) of less-volatile elements like plutonium can be released when the iodine/cesium volatilizes in a meltdown, but at Chernobyl, the core burned in the open air... so much larger amounts were released.

Obviously, fallout from nuclear weapons testing is an entirely different story.

Old Crow

(2,212 posts)
24. Thank you!
Sat May 7, 2016, 06:05 PM
May 2016

That was really helpful and I appreciate your willingness to share your expertise.

Understanding this better makes those millions of bags of waste look a lot less nightmarish.

Old Crow

(2,212 posts)
28. I don't think anyone here is trying to minimize the severity of what happened ...
Sat May 7, 2016, 08:24 PM
May 2016

... or is continuing to happen, at Fukushima.

The discussion I was having with FBaggins was all about those millions of bags of radioactive waste. I hasten to add I am no expert. But from what FBaggins has said, and from what I've been able to learn from articles online, not all radioactive waste is the same. There's high-level, medium-level, and low-level radioactive wastes (and a number of subcategories therein). The material in those plastic bags is LLW (low-level waste), as evidenced by the fact that it's being stored in piles in plastic bags with no shielding, no cooling, and workers are able to work around the bags with nothing but dust masks. Most of the bags contain low-level waste soil that was scraped from the surface of the ground around the plant.

This is not stuff you'd want to ingest, nor would you want to breathe any dust coming off of it. Nor would you want it in contact with your body for any length of time. But from what I'm reading, in a span of 30 years or so, virtually all of that LLW will have radioactivity levels indistinguishable from normal background radiation. At that point, the waste in the bags will be processed as regular garbage or landfill.

To keep LLW away from human hands and lungs while it degrades, the usual procedure is to bury the bags in a concrete vault.

The mistake I made at the start of this thread was in thinking all radioactive waste is the same, when that isn't remotely true.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
29. Thats not true, there are frequent spikes where the radiation will go very high, that indicates
Sat May 7, 2016, 08:40 PM
May 2016

gamma radiation sources, small pieces of really radioactive materials are mixed inside of that dirt.

FBaggins

(26,757 posts)
31. Links please.
Sat May 7, 2016, 08:57 PM
May 2016

Your claim simply isn't true.

The only gamma sources are the short-lived barium atoms that are a decay product of cesium. There have been no "small pieces" of "really radioactive" materials from Fukushima either. The release was almost entirely gaseous.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
14. My family lives 100 kilometers from Fukushima
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:17 PM
May 2016

They don't think it's some funny joke. Are you seriously suggesting that the hundreds of images of piles of collected waste are hoaxes like UFO sightings? You are really delusional if this is the case. Honestly. I rarely post any news of Fukushima just because I don't feel like dealing with posters like you who think the devastation of Fukushima is somehow being exaggerated. It really shows what lengths some people will go to defend nuclear power. Hope you never have to eat your words with a dose of radiation. You live by any nuke towers we can monitor for you? Because sooner or later, you will witness firsthand what lousy neighbors they make.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
17. if you follow the thread
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:29 PM
May 2016

you will see that I was questioning the veracity of RT, as part of a larger issue of using it as a source at all.
I don't doubt there could be truth to the report and would be interested in some news from a decent source.
This has nothing to do with defending nuclear power or thinking Fukushima was exaggerated.
I hope your family is alright.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
18. Like I said, I know the Japanese authorities are removing contaminated topsoil
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:47 PM
May 2016

I just didn't realize how much! The RT drone seems to have captured real images (as have others you can view by googling). It is clearly one of the ways they are trying to contain the poison. Not very effective if you ask me.

As for doubting a news source's veracity, I try and use common sense and a case by case analysis of the evidence presented. I have read outright lies told by NYT and our so-called MSM too many times. How is that any different than Rt's reporting? Like most of us, I have to look beyond what they say. Images are much harder to fake. I don't care where I get glimmers of information. I only hope they all add up to some small sliver of truth in the end.

Sorry if I seemed testy, but many posters get verbally piled on by DUers who mock and ridicule anyone who dares to even raise the topic every time they ever post anything Fukushima related. It certainly creates a damper effect on conversation.

 

uhnope

(6,419 posts)
19. that's cool.
Sat May 7, 2016, 12:28 PM
May 2016

I'm sorry people gang up on you, if you are just try to raise the issue of the continuing effects of the Fukushima disaster. (I haven't seen the threads...some people do pile on if they think something is a baseless CT, but like I said I haven't seen the threads you're referring to and I'm not saying you're posting CTs. I sometimes mock CTers but that had nothing to do with my replies to you.)


7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
26. Sorry for what you and your family are dealing with.
Sat May 7, 2016, 07:38 PM
May 2016

Very sorry for the members here who attack you for your source.
Check out Arne Gunderson,

www.fairewinds.org

He was at 3 Mile Island.

http://www.fairewinds.org/nuclear-energy-education//cctv

FBaggins

(26,757 posts)
23. It's always a good idea to doubt anything you read on RT...
Sat May 7, 2016, 06:02 PM
May 2016

... however, it's pretty well known that soil decontamination in Japan is done by scraping the top layer of soil and carting it off. IIRC, they're up over 11 million tons (in 1-ton bags) removed.

I don't know about the provenance of the video here, but it fits with what has been reported (that lots of it is being stored temporarily in the province). There are likely a number of similar locations.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
8. Well if it washed it all out to sea they would not have to worry
Fri May 6, 2016, 01:58 AM
May 2016

About what they are going to do with it all.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
16. I live by Puget Sound and worry about it too
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:25 PM
May 2016

Fukushima already has made it all but a certainty that the generation of farmers currently working my family's land in Japan will be the last. Only a matter of time until people start showing health effects. Then the real exodus will begin.

mjvpi

(1,389 posts)
13. They haven't dealt with the damaged reactor yet.
Fri May 6, 2016, 10:33 AM
May 2016

My understanding is that they are still trying to build an "ice wall" down into the soil to control what is continuing to come out of the bottom of one of the damaged reactors. I may be mistaken, but my understanding is that they are continuing to pump water into either reactor two or three, to keep it cool. Some of those bags contain the water after it has been used for cooling. I will have to go back and read. Telco has maid it hard to follow.

Generic Other

(28,979 posts)
15. The Japanese government suppresses information
Fri May 6, 2016, 05:22 PM
May 2016

Heaven forbid we get honest information about the dangers nuclear power plants pose. And there are posters on DU who don't want anyone even discussing the topic as the conclusion always boils down to how much risk we are willing to live with. I am sick to death of nuclear power advocates and their radioactive blather.

Welcome to DU.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Nuclear Waste: Drone buzz...