Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:29 PM May 2016

Wasserman Schultz calls Jewish intermarriage a "problem"

2015

Although she does not actively "oppose" it, she identified "assimilation" and intermarriage as problems.




"We have the problem of assimilation. We have the problem of intermarriage. We have the problem that too many generations of Jews don't realize the importance of our institutions strengthening our community..."

Comments and a subsequent clarification from U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Weston have attracted new attention to long-running concerns over the implications of interfaith marriage in the Jewish community.

Wasserman Schultz recently told a Jewish group that interfaith marriage is a "problem." On Tuesday, in a statement issued by the Democratic National Committee, she said she does "not oppose" it.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-wasserman-schultz-jewish-intermarriage-20150203-story.html
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wasserman Schultz calls Jewish intermarriage a "problem" (Original Post) Cheese Sandwich May 2016 OP
She is speaking to a group that shares her faith, She is jewish you know... dubyadiprecession May 2016 #1
That is no way for an elected official to speak. Inclusive my ass. nt valerief May 2016 #10
Tell that to my Rabbi Gothmog May 2016 #15
I think you mean whathehell May 2016 #35
Hell, the position of the Catholic Church is that Catholics shouldn't marry outside their faith still_one May 2016 #54
Why would anyone consider it a problem? 6chars May 2016 #79
Is This a Private Matter? McKim May 2016 #2
I don't like this woman at all but in this I understand her. jwirr May 2016 #3
Why do you hate Jews and the Jewish faith? Gothmog May 2016 #16
I suggest you re-read the post you are replying to. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #30
I did Gothmog May 2016 #41
I did. Your response to jwirr still makes no sense JonLeibowitz May 2016 #53
She's still the DNC chair and will open the Convention in July. George II May 2016 #4
This is OLD, Feb. 2015, fwiw, in her local paper. elleng May 2016 #5
Intermarriage isn't a real problem in America. If some people are concerned about their race or Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #6
I agree.. whathehell May 2016 #7
Ok, I'm Jewish and I am very much an American and am concerned about dilution, largely JudyM May 2016 #23
'dilution'? whathehell May 2016 #33
Of culture. Of traditions. It's more than bloodlines. JudyM May 2016 #38
Yes, we all have those.. whathehell May 2016 #39
Really. You are demonstrating your own. "Move to Israel" is so transparently bigoted. JudyM May 2016 #40
Except I didn't say that... whathehell May 2016 #42
Please. Your suggesting she "could" move to Israel isn't even in the same category as Israel urging JudyM May 2016 #73
'Pease' yourself.. whathehell May 2016 #75
It's both I think, but you shouldn't move to the melting pot if you don't want to have those lines Ed Suspicious May 2016 #76
I agree. whathehell May 2016 #78
Diane Rehm....is that YOU? MADem May 2016 #26
Yes it is inappropriate, and a not so subtle meaning there. Perhaps they feel that American still_one May 2016 #56
I am appalled at this thread. MADem May 2016 #61
Excellent points. Kick & Rec This^^^^^^^^^ still_one May 2016 #62
Generally, yes, elleng May 2016 #8
You say "The culture is strong, the religion maybe not so much" whathehell May 2016 #34
Celebrating holidays together, elleng May 2016 #46
Yes, but the holidays, whathehell May 2016 #77
I'm a senior citizen and can remember when the parents of my Protestant friends didn't want maddiemom May 2016 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #9
Sanders does not attend services and is not observant Gothmog May 2016 #17
Yeah, well, he is running to be President of all people, not just those of any particular faith. nt silvershadow May 2016 #19
I saw that Sanders has done poorly in exit polls with Jews Gothmog May 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #27
Oh, come on... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #22
So you are an expert on Judiasm and the Jewish people? Gothmog May 2016 #24
Why should it be? MrMickeysMom May 2016 #28
They're really digging to find "dirt" on anyone who gets in the way. I hear she said... George II May 2016 #50
The right wing conservative Jewish establishment in Israel and U.S. is Lodestar May 2016 #11
wonder how this affects decisions government/political/legal wise .... Hiraeth May 2016 #13
Does it license right wingers to start talking about the "problem" of intermarriage? Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #18
sounds like a personal problem, to me Hiraeth May 2016 #21
This is a topic at my Temple at least three or four times a year Gothmog May 2016 #14
When some right wing groups espouse seperation of races and cultures it's creepy. I don't know what GoneFishin May 2016 #20
Yes.. whathehell May 2016 #36
er Debbie DonCoquixote May 2016 #29
So what? Behind the Aegis May 2016 #31
Let me ask you a question.. whathehell May 2016 #37
"Judaism" is a religion. Behind the Aegis May 2016 #43
Further clarification, please.. whathehell May 2016 #44
I don't know how to make this any more simple. Behind the Aegis May 2016 #45
+1. MADem May 2016 #47
+1000 awoke_in_2003 May 2016 #49
We are talking a personal religious belief, not someone imposing that belief on anyone else. still_one May 2016 #51
You don't need to make it "simple", only clear, and not whathehell May 2016 #80
Thank you BTA. There are a lot of not so subtle insinuations that have been tossed about still_one May 2016 #48
Thank you! 6chars May 2016 #58
I know antisemites who feel the same way she does: assimulation and intermarriage is a big... marble falls May 2016 #32
Did you bring this up more than a year ago when she first said it? George II May 2016 #52
People should marry whoever they want of any race, ethnicity or religion, and it's not a problem. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #55
Why is this an issue for you now but wasn't an issue for you more than a year ago? George II May 2016 #60
It's not an issue for me. I support all interracial couples and stuff like that. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #64
Okay, let me try this (since you're evading the question) - why is this something you needed.... George II May 2016 #66
Gee, do you think this is in any way is a veiled barb at Bernie and Jane Sanders? highprincipleswork May 2016 #57
I doubt it because this happened over a year ago before Bernie got big Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #59
SMH. This is incredible that you would even say this. MADem May 2016 #65
Perhaps chill? highprincipleswork May 2016 #68
Yeah, because this kind of commentary is OK? MADem May 2016 #70
While you're on your very angry high horse, perhaps you will pause a moment to calmly explain highprincipleswork May 2016 #71
Perhaps YOU need to pull the string and see to whom I was speaking MADem May 2016 #72
Thanks for correction. highprincipleswork May 2016 #67
Check the date. Sanders wasn't even in the race MADem May 2016 #63
Reality is reality. I'm not concerned about it. highprincipleswork May 2016 #69
Well, your notion of reality has nothing to do with actual reality. MADem May 2016 #74

dubyadiprecession

(5,711 posts)
1. She is speaking to a group that shares her faith, She is jewish you know...
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:41 PM
May 2016

Many other religious people feel that way about their own faiths, not just jews. I respect the individuals in the jewish community who wish to preserve their religious heritage.

Gothmog

(145,195 posts)
15. Tell that to my Rabbi
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:51 PM
May 2016

This is a major concern in the Jewish community. My Temple is fairly liberal and allows interfaith marriages but many temples do not because of the effects on intermarriage.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
54. Hell, the position of the Catholic Church is that Catholics shouldn't marry outside their faith
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:22 PM
May 2016

That is their personal belief. No one is forced to follow that

Oh wait.......

It's ok, because the thought police are telling people what they should or should not think.

I tested this out on a different thread, and actually was alerted on:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1465802

Some of this type of thought process comes right out of the movie "Minority Report"

6chars

(3,967 posts)
79. Why would anyone consider it a problem?
Sun May 29, 2016, 06:03 PM
May 2016

57% of people with one Jewish parent do not identify as Jewish, and the majority who do identify as Jewish are Jews of no religion, I.e. ethnic Jews. 72% of non orthodox Jews getting married are mwqrrying non Jews. I'm no mathematician but I can see how those who want the Jewish community ... especially its religious institutions ...to continue over the next century would see this as a problem. Dws is clear that this is not that the intermarried individuals are a problem or that goyim are dirty or whatever, rather the trend is a problem for the perpetuation of thhe jewizh community. The disagreement with dws I think comes from people who wonder why anyone should care if one community or another fades away.

McKim

(2,412 posts)
2. Is This a Private Matter?
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:43 PM
May 2016

Was she speaking in her role as DNC chair, or was it a private gathering of Jews to talk about their faith and its future?
If she was speaking as DNC Chair, then it was not appropriate. She is probably a leader in the Jewish Community because of her political roles. But, really, as a Leftist and a Palestine Human Rights Activist, I have no problem with her saying this. This is a really private matter and it should stay private. I could be wrong. I do not like to see the press dig and delve into every private matter that a politician may have. People have a right to their own private religious beliefs and practices.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
3. I don't like this woman at all but in this I understand her.
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:47 PM
May 2016

What we used to say about racial intermarriage was not true because cultures can be entwined.

What has been said about religion is another thing. A religion is not just culture it is a belief system. And when two belief systems collide it can be a real problem. My Lutheran sister married a rastafarian (SP?) and it took them years to deal with the counter beliefs. After their divorce he has now become a Jew.

That does not mean that every religious intermarrage does not work. Many do.

Gothmog

(145,195 posts)
16. Why do you hate Jews and the Jewish faith?
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:53 PM
May 2016

Do you want to come explain to the rabbis at my Temple why they are wrong to be concerned about this? They would love to talk to you and explain why you are wrong

George II

(67,782 posts)
4. She's still the DNC chair and will open the Convention in July.
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:48 PM
May 2016

Have you run out of stuff already so you have to go back more than a year now?

elleng

(130,895 posts)
5. This is OLD, Feb. 2015, fwiw, in her local paper.
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:50 PM
May 2016

'Comments and a subsequent clarification from U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Weston have attracted new attention to long-running concerns over the implications of interfaith marriage in the Jewish community.

Wasserman Schultz recently told a Jewish group that interfaith marriage is a "problem." On Tuesday, in a statement issued by the Democratic National Committee, she said she does "not oppose" it.

Wasserman Schultz's use of the term "problem" isn't an unusual view; many in the Jewish community are concerned about interfaith marriage. But every utterance from the Democratic congresswoman, who represents a heavily Jewish district in Broward and Miami-Dade counties, receives scrutiny because she's the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee.'>>>

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
6. Intermarriage isn't a real problem in America. If some people are concerned about their race or
Sat May 28, 2016, 02:53 PM
May 2016

culture being diluted, OK that's a certain type of opinion, but I just think it's dumb.

JudyM

(29,237 posts)
23. Ok, I'm Jewish and I am very much an American and am concerned about dilution, largely
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:24 PM
May 2016

because we lost a huge portion of our culture and people in the Holocaust. I treasure my Jewish culture. Should I move to Israel too?!

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
39. Yes, we all have those..
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:30 AM
May 2016

but I suspect any other group expressing such negative
views on 'dilution' and intermarriage would be accused of something like racism.

JudyM

(29,237 posts)
40. Really. You are demonstrating your own. "Move to Israel" is so transparently bigoted.
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:40 AM
May 2016

You think that's higher ground than telling people to go back to Mexico? Or you think we don't notice because it's DWS?

No. What you said is an antisemitic trope. And it's hurtful.

And then you layered on another: "any other group" wouldn't be treated as leniently as the Jews.
Take a look inside, please, if you really don't see this in your posts.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
42. Except I didn't say that...
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:12 AM
May 2016

I said she :"could", offering it as it as an alternative to someone who's a citizen of a country with a largely non-Jewish population and thinks asaimilatioin is a problem.


I've seen articles written by Israelis in Jewish newspapers
urging American Jews to expatriate to Israel for exactly that reason....Are they guilty of trafficking in an "anti-semitic trope" too?



JudyM

(29,237 posts)
73. Please. Your suggesting she "could" move to Israel isn't even in the same category as Israel urging
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:18 PM
May 2016

People to move there. Who the hell do you think you're fooling!? You made 2 bigoted comments. If you had any honor at all you'd own it.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
75. 'Pease' yourself..
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:38 PM
May 2016

Last edited Sun May 29, 2016, 06:38 PM - Edit history (2)

It:s always instructive when someone pours on the accusations and name calling instead of responding directly to the content of your post.

I'm not :"fooling" anyone nor do I need to...There's no bigotry in my posts. If you don't like them, ignore is your friend. Goodbye.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
76. It's both I think, but you shouldn't move to the melting pot if you don't want to have those lines
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:40 PM
May 2016

commingled.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
56. Yes it is inappropriate, and a not so subtle meaning there. Perhaps they feel that American
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:28 PM
May 2016

Catholics who don't believe in marriage outside the religion should move to Rome?

I have seen similar insinuations directed toward others in Congress who happen to be Jewish

You are right, it is inappropriate

MADem

(135,425 posts)
61. I am appalled at this thread.
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:42 PM
May 2016

I am rocked back on my heels at some of the commentary here. It's completely unsubtle, but it's "OK" because it is aimed at someone the "Brigade" doesn't like.

We know, full well, that if the person making DWS's observations were Bernie Sanders, that anyone coming back at them with some of the snide insinuations I've seen in this thread would be blown out of the water. There would be screeching, screaming, rending of garments, demands for frog-marching, etc., etc., and so forth.

I recall when Diane Rehm talked about Sanders' "dual Israeli citizenship" and the Brigade wanted her head on a pike. "How DARE she!!!" But I guess it's OK to say those sorts of things if the target is someone other than Bernie.

Situational outrage, to be sure.

By their words we are certainly getting to know them, I guess. smh!

elleng

(130,895 posts)
8. Generally, yes,
Sat May 28, 2016, 03:07 PM
May 2016

but it IS an issue in the Jewish community.

P.S., I am Jewish, married a 'lapsed' Catholic, celebrated all holidays so daughters saw it all, but didn't attend synagogue. Daughters attended Catholic elementary and high schools because available DC public schools not suitable. Daughters identify as 'Jewish.' Their kiddies, little now, will celebrate ??? They DO Chanukah/Christmas, and 'Eastover.' Same I think for my landlord's family, with triplets! Just finished their first college year, so we shall see.

Our culture is strong; 'religion,' maybe not so much.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
34. You say "The culture is strong, the religion maybe not so much"
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:32 AM
May 2016

Can you describe the culture independent of the religion?

I don't see it.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
46. Celebrating holidays together,
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:20 PM
May 2016

honoring education, enjoying special foods, enjoying music and arts together, honoring ancestors lost in many wars/battles due to religion, these things off the top of my head.



whathehell

(29,067 posts)
77. Yes, but the holidays,
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:50 PM
May 2016

Last edited Sun May 29, 2016, 06:39 PM - Edit history (1)

along with much of the food, is based on religion, no?

I would say that honoring education. music and the arts is not unique to Jewish people, nor is honoring ancestors who've died as a direct result of ethnic/religious discrimination.. Just my thoughts.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
12. I'm a senior citizen and can remember when the parents of my Protestant friends didn't want
Sat May 28, 2016, 04:57 PM
May 2016

their kids dating Catholics and vice-versa (someone Jewish? Usually beyond the pale on both sides). Most of my family, on both sides, were not very religious, and we already had a mix of Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish among our relatives over several generations. I grew up in the Fifties and Sixties knowing this was unusual in my small town/suburban area. By college, however, I found there were others like me (wow). Although nominally Protestant, I married a "fallen away" Roman Catholic whose family couldn't have been more welcoming. A Protestant school friend married an Eastern Orthodox Catholic. (they cross themselves the other way). When our daughter entered elementary school after a Montessori, multi-cultural preschool in a college town, she felt funny because "everyone else went to church." Her Dad asked if I minded if she went through the Catholic thing, and of course, I didn't. I now have an adult "Catholic" daughter who loves the holiday ceremonies like midnight mass and otherwise rarely attends church. She is also a kind, caring, and open-minded person. Religion had little to do with it. I'm amazed this should be important today.

Response to elleng (Reply #5)

Gothmog

(145,195 posts)
17. Sanders does not attend services and is not observant
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:55 PM
May 2016

As a former board member of my Temple, this is a major issue that the Rabbis raise three or four times a year.

BTW, Sanders visited Liberty University on a High Holy Day which had many people in my Temple very upset.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
19. Yeah, well, he is running to be President of all people, not just those of any particular faith. nt
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:26 PM
May 2016

Gothmog

(145,195 posts)
25. I saw that Sanders has done poorly in exit polls with Jews
Sat May 28, 2016, 11:57 PM
May 2016

Having surrogates like Cornel West does not help nor does it help when Sanders make a speech to Liberty University on a High Holy day

Response to Gothmog (Reply #25)

George II

(67,782 posts)
50. They're really digging to find "dirt" on anyone who gets in the way. I hear she said...
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

...."shucks" when she was in high school. For shame, for shame!

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
11. The right wing conservative Jewish establishment in Israel and U.S. is
Sat May 28, 2016, 04:04 PM
May 2016

very concerned about Bernie. I've read a few articles in Jewish culture
magazines and the headlines are very anti-Bernie because they fear he
will be too pro-Palestinian or at least not pro-settlements. Israel has
taken a very hard turn to the right in many ways.

I wonder if Schultz is aligned with them.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
18. Does it license right wingers to start talking about the "problem" of intermarriage?
Sat May 28, 2016, 07:04 PM
May 2016

I wonder if talking about the problem of intermarriages sort of might legitimize the idea that intermarriages are a problem.

Gothmog

(145,195 posts)
14. This is a topic at my Temple at least three or four times a year
Sat May 28, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

The rabbis preach this sermon three or four times a year at my Temple. It is a big topic at most Temples

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
20. When some right wing groups espouse seperation of races and cultures it's creepy. I don't know what
Sat May 28, 2016, 08:31 PM
May 2016

to do with this, but it seems to have some of the same elements.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
29. er Debbie
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:09 AM
May 2016

Your Boss Hillary has a daughter that married a Jew. Speaking against intermarriage might upset Chelsea. Hypocrisy much?

Behind the Aegis

(53,956 posts)
31. So what?
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:17 AM
May 2016

I really dislike the over analyzation of the Jewish community lately. Many minority communities have discussions about assimilation, it isn't just limited to Jews. Jews are far more than a religion, and many like to ignore or even discount the ethnic component because it doesn't fit their little hate-filled narrative. DWS may be a putz, but she has a right to speak out on Jewish issues.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
37. Let me ask you a question..
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:01 AM
May 2016

What's with "they ignore or even discount the ethnic component because it doesn't fit their little hate-filled narrative".

Say what? I am not understanding you...First of all, who is "they" and what is "their little hate-filled narrative"?

I'm confused, because on numerous occasions, I've heard Jewish people,, even Orthodox Jews, say that Judaism is a religion, not an ethnicity.


Behind the Aegis

(53,956 posts)
43. "Judaism" is a religion.
Sun May 29, 2016, 12:07 PM
May 2016

A "Jew", however, can be a religious designation, an ethnic designation, or both.

"They" are the anti-Semites who ignore the various components of Jews to excuse or even justify their anti-Semitism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnoreligious_group
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews#Ethnic_divisions

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
44. Further clarification, please..
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:11 PM
May 2016

Who are "the anti-Semites who ignore the various components of Jews to excuse or even justify their
anti-semitism"?

I ask because the only people I know who have claimed that being Jewish is a religion and NOT an ethnicity, are Jews themselves. I don't imagine they are anti-Semites.





Behind the Aegis

(53,956 posts)
45. I don't know how to make this any more simple.
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:19 PM
May 2016

"Judaism" is a religion.

"Jewish" is an adjective describing someone who practices Judaism or is a Jew.

"Jew" is a noun which refers to a person who is religiously, ethnically, or both Jewish.

So "being Jewish" generally does refer to religious practice. "Being a Jew" can refer to religion or ethnicity.

I suggest you read the links I provided. And yes, Jews can be anti-Semites, and just because they aren't including ethnicity as a descriptor doesn't mean they are anti-Semitic, maybe just not knowledgeable.

"Anti-Semites" are bigots who espouse anti-Jewish rhetoric or stereotypes, such as "Jews are more loyal to Israel" or "Jews should "go back" to Israel." To be clear, those aren't the only examples of anti-Semitism.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
47. +1.
Sun May 29, 2016, 01:55 PM
May 2016

I can't believe this thread has been allowed to continue on.

If a Clinton supporter were the one saying "Bernie Sanders 'COULD' go back to Israel" this place would be on fire with outrage and the noise from the splash from the perpetrator being tossed over the side would be heard across the oceans.

This thread is persisting because there are posters here who don't like DWS, and they will excuse anti-semitic tropes because they don't like her.

I'm appalled at this thread. smh.

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
49. +1000
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:11 PM
May 2016

It shouldn't be a hard concept to grasp. I think some are just playing that way to rail on DWS, whom I don't really care much for.

still_one

(92,190 posts)
51. We are talking a personal religious belief, not someone imposing that belief on anyone else.
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:13 PM
May 2016

As I said, if someone want to criticize the Democratic chair, at least criticize her on something relevant.

The fact that the OP choose this point to be critical of the Democratic chair, implies at the minimum, an anti-Jewish sentiment.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
80. You don't need to make it "simple", only clear, and not
Sun May 29, 2016, 06:19 PM
May 2016

to me, it seems, but to the many other Jews who appear to disagree with you.

In addition, I'm well-versed in the difference between nouns and adjectives, so take your
condescension elsewhere. I'm done here



still_one

(92,190 posts)
48. Thank you BTA. There are a lot of not so subtle insinuations that have been tossed about
Sun May 29, 2016, 02:58 PM
May 2016

There are Catholics who don't believe other Catholics should marry outside their religion, unless the other person converts to Catholicism. In fact, that has the position of the Catholic Church for sometime now.

In fact there are a lot of religions who are of the view that someone should not marry outside their faith.

Does that mean if a Catholic holds that position, that person isn't qualified to hold certain position?

We are talking a personal religious belief, not someone imposing that belief on anyone else.

If someone want to criticize the Democratic chair, at least criticize her on something relevant


6chars

(3,967 posts)
58. Thank you!
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

The over analyzation of the Jewish community is a fetish. It is not necessarily a good thing to be the object of someone else's fetish. And also, as you say, far more than a religion - duh, yeah. What really sucks is there are 500x as many non-Jews as Jews, so this fetish and the need to explain to them all the time what Jews are, why Jews do this, etc. is pretty exhausting - in fact impossible. Time to let it be.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
55. People should marry whoever they want of any race, ethnicity or religion, and it's not a problem.
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:27 PM
May 2016

I was surprised to hear her call it a problem.

What's that reasoning behind that anyway? Why is it a problem? Is she concerned about preserving the culture or is it like to protect the bloodline or something? I'm genuinely curious as to the reasoning behind this.

George II

(67,782 posts)
60. Why is this an issue for you now but wasn't an issue for you more than a year ago?
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:40 PM
May 2016

If you were "genuinely curious as to the reasoning behind this" why not do some research into the reasoning behind people's thought on the matter instead of posting a year-old video on DU?

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
64. It's not an issue for me. I support all interracial couples and stuff like that.
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:47 PM
May 2016

They have enough challenges and bigotry to deal with.

George II

(67,782 posts)
66. Okay, let me try this (since you're evading the question) - why is this something you needed....
Sun May 29, 2016, 04:28 PM
May 2016

...to bring up now, in the midst of a primary campaign over which DWS is presiding and just before a Convention over which she'll be presiding, instead of 15 months ago when she said it?

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
57. Gee, do you think this is in any way is a veiled barb at Bernie and Jane Sanders?
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:30 PM
May 2016

I just finished reading at how Jane is being attacked by other Hillary supporters, so that helped give me this thought. However, kind of make sense doesn't it, you know, in that reality has a distinct pattern to it.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
59. I doubt it because this happened over a year ago before Bernie got big
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:32 PM
May 2016

But it certainly does apply to them.

If DWS sees this kind of marriage as a problem it could explain if she has some personal hatred of Bernie and Jane Sanders .

MADem

(135,425 posts)
70. Yeah, because this kind of commentary is OK?
Sun May 29, 2016, 04:36 PM
May 2016


I don't "chill" in the face of this kind of talk. Sorry if you can't "deal."

Why don't you perhaps do some homework--start here: http://brandeiscenter.com/

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
71. While you're on your very angry high horse, perhaps you will pause a moment to calmly explain
Sun May 29, 2016, 04:38 PM
May 2016

just why and how for you what I said was so earthshakingly bad? Other than that I fucked up and missed the date on which she said what she said.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
72. Perhaps YOU need to pull the string and see to whom I was speaking
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:09 PM
May 2016

when you interjected with your "chill" crap?

Hint: It wasn't you. At least follow the conversation before you snark.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
63. Check the date. Sanders wasn't even in the race
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:47 PM
May 2016

when DWS made these remarks IN A RELIGIOUS setting, not as a Congresswoman. This is recycled information, and the not so veiled insinuations being made in this thread are ugly.

So what was that about "reality?"

And Jane is (or was) a Catholic, so not sure where you are even going with that train of thought.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
74. Well, your notion of reality has nothing to do with actual reality.
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:32 PM
May 2016

DWS's private comments predate Sanders' arrival upon the scene.

One has nothing to do with the other.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Video & Multimedia»Wasserman Schultz calls J...