Any movies that were suggested to as great but when you saw them they sucked?
I swear my friends are turning into devout philistines. Either that or I've evolved into an aloof snob. There's a few I know that any and every damned movie they gush about, and damn near demand I see, is gonna suck.
-- 'Borat'
I should have been suspicious when this one person was just babbling and gushing about how "Its SO funny!" and when I asked why she just said, Well it's just, I dunno....Funny!". Now she's not the most articulate sort so I just chalked her lack of specifics up to that and put it in my Netflix queue. It was beyond inane. I know humor, and that aint humor. I thought it just started slowly and then would build up: It didn't. I ejected the disc after 45 or 50 minutes I just couldn't take any more.
-- 'Pearl Harbor'
This one I did sit all the way through but even with prodigious use of the fast forward button ( through all the stupid romance bullshit designed to pull the drama queen crowd ) it was still the most part 2 hours of my life I'll never get back. I found decent CGI but infernally annoying historical inaccuracies in the dialog and situations and syrupy jingoism. Goddammit! I was hoping for a 'Tora Tora Tora' with modern effects, not a "Rom-Com" with aircraft dogfights. What really struck me was when I confronted the person who suggested this: The parts he liked the most; were the ones that turned me off the most. The gratuitous jingoistic bullshit. I mentioned the gross inaccuracies and was met with his pat answer: "Yeah It's just a movie". "Yeah, and it fucking sucked". My pat answer.
-- 'Taken'
This one suggested by two people. It must be good. 
Another friend and a girl I'm currently dating and pitching woo too. Billed by them as the ultimate cinematic masterpiece. No, it's the worst movie I ever saw. I mean it. Note to producer and director: If you must absolutely have a formulaic good vs bad jingoistic plot, at least make the "good guys" less revolting. I don't know how they did it, but I came to despise the daughter and her friend from the get-go, and the protagonist's character more as the movie went on.
The last is more of an after the fact thing. In the breakroom at work during lunch/dinner I have to suffer through whatever everyone else wants to watch on the TV in there, and so I get out-voted 15 to 1. ( My vote is to turn the damned thing off and eat in peace and quiet after working the previous 4 hours in a very noisy environment ) but for whatever reason I have to sit through LOUD episodes of 'Two and a half men'. Now everyone plays this up as the best thing on TV. Typical sitcom one-liner BS. My face muscles ache from rolling my eyes and scoffing and the sum total of all the mirth I was able to sweep up in one pile after being subjected to like 29 or so episodes was about 2.63 half-hearted chuckles.
Anyway, I'm eager to hear yours and I'm sure among those will be others I noted but haven't yet come to my mind.
= new reply since forum marked as read
My friend and I intended to see another movie, but it was gone, so we saw "Sideways" instead. 
Our tastes tend to run quite counter to the court of public opinion and in inverse relationship to the box office take!
Titanic... UGH. 
I agree.
ahhhhhh...
Sorry... 
with a plot and storyline. It's not meant as a means to entertain an audience and sell popcorn. It's a series of scenes strung together as things of the moment, like a series of photographs or sculptures. It's an example of "chosisme" ("thingism"
where there is a very intricate and almost mathematical structure to the assembled images as separate things that only make sense once you note the order in which they're presented. It's pretty opaque and it's not trying to transmit a concept of story or character through the images but the images themselves (the things) are their own concept. As an entertainment type of film with a story it seems absurd. As an experiment in a different way of looking at an assemblage of images in a certain order on the screen it's pretty interesting. It's a film interested in exploring what a film is and it shouldn't be viewed without that forewarning. The director, Alain Robbe-Grillet wrote an interesting and challenging novel, La Jalousie that I read in college that was also an exploration into the technique of storytelling and what really happened in the story being told.
Cast people who can actually sing!!! 
I still have not seen that one and hopefully I will always be able to avoid it. People around here were having Titanic parties. The claim of seeing it 7 or more times brought on squeals from some people I know. It was all I could do to keep my eyes from rolling all the way around in my skull.
Reclusive redneck lives in a boat in a tree (it got there in a flood).
Recluse loves a girl in town. Recluse sends her notes about how much he loves her but it ain't gonna work out. Notes sent through two little boys who befriend him. No, this is NOT "Stand by Me".
Ugly rednecks on the Mississippi full of empty philosophizing and parents scaring the children if they ask questions or say anything.
Nothing happens for two hours. I never thought I would be so glad to see a shootout! Finally, something happens!
======
Also, Million Dollar Baby. I cannot give a shit about a woman (or man) who beats other women up and attempts to kill them in her job. She got what she deserved by ending up dying because another woman mortally injured her. Also, she was talking in the hospital with a trach tube. Gimme a break!
Any gangster or professional criminal movie. Silence of the Lambs, Godfather series, Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill, Fargo (except for the mildly amusing cop Frances McDormand)--the same endless theme of men (and women especially) as murder & assault victims.
Can't be bothered to give a shit about immoral murderers. I don't think violence alone is entertaining. Same thing with the newer Batman movies. Can't give a shit about endless violence & threats of violence with no emotional connections with characters. Real world violence is much grosser than movie violence and I don't want to see either one.
I have watched historical movies like Schindler's List that show violence in time of war and show us how evil normal people can be and murder can be planned and executed by paper shufflers who see nothing wrong in patriotically following orders. That's a teaching opportunity.
Couldn't watch Alien on TV. Yuck. No way I want to see a slimy snake. I avoid horror and violent movies because I will have nightmares.
Apparently I was the only person in America who didn't like that movie. I just found every character in it to be completely unlikeable. I wanted to punch every one of them in the face at various points during the film. Have no idea what the moral of the story was supposed to be, either. Two hours wasted that I'll never get back. I was completely mystified by all the good reviews that film got. And I think it even won an Oscar or something. Were other people watching the same movie I was???? 
They all follow the exact same fucking formula and there's absolutely no variation among any of them. Artist / sports figure / musician / actor / etc. has troubled child hood. Artist starts making music and making the big money that comes with it. Artist meets the woman/man of their dreams. Then they fall apart to drugs and alcohol and nearly ruin their lives. Then they go to rehab and somehow going to rehab and cleaning up makes their lives better. and the demons of their past magically get exorcized. I can think of about 100 bio pics that have this same formula. Can they make movies about real life people that don't follow this formula? 
That's why I loved "Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox" story - it was a direct parody of "Walk The Line" - a movie that followed this exact formula to a T, and had some very obvious and not so subtle times when it pointed out the comparisons between the two movies.
