Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:58 PM Dec 2014

The ITA alphabet?

(I)nitial (T)eaching (A)lphabet.

Ran across this when reading an article about letters once considered in our now standard alphabet. Seems like it was taught in the 50's and relied heavily on phonics and passed out of style when emphasis was placed on memorization.

Were any of you old farts taught this in school?

[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The ITA alphabet? (Original Post) packman Dec 2014 OP
Early sixties, I LOATHED PHONICS. hunter Dec 2014 #1
I was taught this in first grade ... surrealAmerican Dec 2014 #2
Probably another case of ... eppur_se_muova Dec 2014 #3
That looks like the international pronunciation guide Art_from_Ark Dec 2014 #4
Fortunately, I was never subjected to "new" theories of teaching. HeiressofBickworth Dec 2014 #5

hunter

(38,318 posts)
1. Early sixties, I LOATHED PHONICS.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 02:39 PM
Dec 2014

I entered kindergarten knowing how to read, but not quite knowing how to talk.

While everyone else was learning to read, I was usually visiting the speech therapists.

I did three years of that.

My reading style is entirely visual. My writing style is a combination of both.

Anyways, the ITA phonetic alphabet was largely superseded by this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Phonetic_Alphabet

Then, of course, developers of computer voice synthesis and speech recognition software have exposed serious deficiencies in phonics models and notations.

surrealAmerican

(11,362 posts)
2. I was taught this in first grade ...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 04:36 PM
Dec 2014

... in 1969. At the time, they claimed it allowed children to read and write six months earlier than the traditional approach.

We children liked it mainly because the ITA books were new and interesting compared to the Dick and Jane type of "primers" they had us reading from after we made the transition to the regular alphabet.

Most of my class (including me) had a lot of trouble with spelling for years after this.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
4. That looks like the international pronunciation guide
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:49 AM
Dec 2014

Almost the same, but not exactly the same. It's used in Japan and elsewhere to show pronunciations of English words (and I guess, words in other languages). I never learned it in school.

HeiressofBickworth

(2,682 posts)
5. Fortunately, I was never subjected to "new" theories of teaching.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:05 AM
Dec 2014

I have always been a reader and I wrote legal documents for a living (paralegal). For a while, during high school, I had trouble with spelling because I was taking shorthand and it uses phonetics. Really messes one up for spelling.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»The ITA alphabet?