Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 11:23 PM Mar 2017

Science Fiction Movie "Life" MAJOR SPOILERS

I'M NOT KIDDING. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO READ SPOILERS, STOP HERE.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

..

.
.
.
.
.
.
.

I had to unload because this movie would be a disappointment to anyone who has ever seen an alien movie.

A better title for this movie would have been "Too Stupid to Live." The best way to describe what goes on in this story is that the most intelligent make it through, and the rest succumb to anemic contrivances.

To begin, you have the all too friendly-with-the-creature scientist who just keeps interacting with the rapidly growing life form (which is the most interesting character in this movie), until the creature decides it's time to claim its rightful position on the food chain.

When the creature finally breaks through the flimsy barrier of a rubber glove like some rabid sperm there's actual confusion in the cabin as to what to do next, in particular, how to kill it. Really? They're on a multi-billion dollar space station which was intended to study alien life forms and they didn't think about building a contained lab that they could jettison if there's a breach?

And then the second boneheaded move was the second astronaut who said, just damn it, and goes into the contained lab to rescue the first scientist. He storms into the room when the creature is distracted absorbing a lab rat that happens to be pinned down during the entire first part of the movie. I don't see any scientific reason for this poor thing to be held this way, except for this specific contrived scene. And, as far as contrivances go, it's sad. I mean, how long does it take to absorb a lab rat? We get to see most of it turn into a protoplasmic blob before that second astronaut decides to go on his rescue mission. When he does step in that room, you're in your seat saying, "Wait, what? What's the point of having a contained lab that doesn't automatically lock the door if there's a breach?" I don't get it.

They didn't even have the tools to kill the creature in that "sealed" lab. They had to MacGyver a weapon out of a portable flame thrower. In fact, calling it a contained lab was a stretch because the air vents, that came on to suck the smoke from the MacGyvered weapon, suddenly offered a breach opening for this creature to escape into the rest of the ship.

Now, wouldn't you think that a billion dollar space station would have an override to shut down the vents at one time? Not this station. They had to be shut down one by one. Imagine the suspense as each vent was shut down in the exact order the Life form would seek them out -- at lightning speed.

The plotlines for the rest of the movie follows the same pattern. By the time the twist ending arrives, you're expecting it because nothing, and I mean nothing in the reactions and decisions of this crew follow any known or expected protocols.

There's at least one spectacular death, if you're into that kind of thing, but for the most part, this movie will only excite movie goers who have never seen an Alien movie. There are ways to write good science fiction based on human failures, i.e the Andromeda Strain. But this movie would be perfect fodder for Science Theater 2000.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Science Fiction Movie "Life" MAJOR SPOILERS (Original Post) Baitball Blogger Mar 2017 OP
Nicely written, Baitball! I saw a trailer on teevee, and I adore my Jakie G., and I like Leghorn21 Mar 2017 #1
At $12 a ticket, I had to say something. Baitball Blogger Mar 2017 #6
I saw an article that said it wasn't good BlueSpot Mar 2017 #2
Arrival was damned good, though. longship Mar 2017 #3
Arrival was excellent Baitball Blogger Mar 2017 #7
Hey the stole from the Thing as well... nt uriel1972 Mar 2017 #4
If only it was like the Thing. Each person this creature absorbed would have Baitball Blogger Mar 2017 #8
Sounds like a stinker. pressbox69 Mar 2017 #5
One wonders if this will be riffed by the MST3K crew sakabatou Mar 2017 #9
Oh, I hope so. Baitball Blogger Mar 2017 #10

Leghorn21

(13,523 posts)
1. Nicely written, Baitball! I saw a trailer on teevee, and I adore my Jakie G., and I like
Sat Mar 25, 2017, 11:33 PM
Mar 2017

Reynolds just fine, but I thought oh damn - is this a remake of "Alien", with a dash of "Species" on top?

Uhhhh YEP! Confirmed by Baitball - damn, sounds really awful...thanks for taking a hit for theater-goers everywhere!

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
6. At $12 a ticket, I had to say something.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 09:26 AM
Mar 2017

Not right in this day and age to lose that kind of entertainment money from the home budget for stinkers like his one. (Though, it doesn't have to be a stinker - it could turn into a cult movie where you can mock all mistakes made along the way.)

They even included a part in the movie to forecast the moment the movie is about to take a turn into the darkness. The scientist forgets protocols that sets off alarms. After ensuring that everything is alright, the captain says something like, let this be the only mistake we make. NOT! It is the beginning.

I like Jake and Ryan as well. It's like Ryan read the script and saw where the movie was about to go south so he used his rank to opt out early. Jake must have owed a few favors in Hollywood, so he had to stick it out to the end.

And, damn, two women in charge in a movie that will be epically remembered for one bad decision after the other. Not nice, Hollywood. Not nice.

BlueSpot

(855 posts)
2. I saw an article that said it wasn't good
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 12:10 AM
Mar 2017

Sounds like it was on target. I think I'll save my money on this one. Thanks for the confirmation.

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. Arrival was damned good, though.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 12:32 AM
Mar 2017

Got Arrival from NetFlix and watched it about a dozen times. Nicely done.

Thanks, I'll gladly skip this one.

Gravity utterly sucked, too. The first guy who dies in the film was goofing off while on an EVA. He deserved death. No astronaut would do that. None of them. It went downhill from there.

Hollywood just cannot help itself. They have to destroy things, including unending remakes of old movies. The only good remake in history was The Maltese Falcon and that was because John Huston stuck to Dashiell Hammett's original dialog.

Thanks for the warning.

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
7. Arrival was excellent
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 09:31 AM
Mar 2017

Very cleverly crafted. Though I determined that we were watching the scenes in different timelines early on.

Baitball Blogger

(46,684 posts)
8. If only it was like the Thing. Each person this creature absorbed would have
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 09:32 AM
Mar 2017

improved his or her IQ exponentially.

pressbox69

(2,252 posts)
5. Sounds like a stinker.
Sun Mar 26, 2017, 03:43 AM
Mar 2017

Another bad remake of It, The Terror From Outer Space!BTW,Gravity was a ripoff of an old Ray Bradbury story.

Latest Discussions»The DU Lounge»Science Fiction Movie "Li...