Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JustAnotherGen

(31,926 posts)
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 05:57 AM Jan 2014

If this was retaliation for the NJ SCOTUS battles . . .

Then his goose is cooked.

A heated battle over the high court has been unfolding since Christie took office in 2010. The governor campaigned on a promise to tilt the court to the right, but state Democrats say a court dominated by Christie appointees would undermine key decisions that over the decades have ordered New Jersey to provide housing for its poorest residents and funding for urban schools.

The Democratic-controlled state Senate has approved two of Christie's nominees since 2011: Justices Faustino Fernandez-Vina and Anne Patterson. If his two remaining nominees are approved, Christie's appointees would become a majority on the seven-member Supreme Court.

Board of Public Utilities President Robert Hanna and Superior Court Judge David Bauman — an independent and a Republican, respectively — have been stonewalled by Democrats for more than a year without a hearing in the Judiciary Committee. Democrats have said they want those two seats to remain in Democratic hands.

At the time of the bridge closure, there was an epic battle over judicial appointments that culminated in Christie yanking a Republican nominee after it was clear she would be filibustered. In a press conference, he called Senate Democrats "animals" and said he would not subject his friend the judge to them
.



Loretta is an animal? Really Governor? After you played games with the court? Red State Governors who have had natural disasters should be kissing President Obama's ass right now. He didn't cause it to happen - yet ran to help our fellow citizens and well us in NJ - in spite of the vindictive s.o.b.s holding up his judicial appointments and the outright ruthless nastiness from that side of the aisle.


This "theory" makes sense. It was right there in front of all of us. It just makes sense.
- See more at: http://crooksandliars.com/2014/01/maddow-did-christie-retaliate-over-supreme#sthash.9ju8M3jC.dpuf
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If this was retaliation for the NJ SCOTUS battles . . . (Original Post) JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 OP
true... tulsakatz Jan 2014 #1

tulsakatz

(3,122 posts)
1. true...
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 06:43 AM
Jan 2014

it makes more sense than retaliating against a democratic Mayor who refused to endorse his bid!!

He can say he's not a bully if he wants to but none of us really believe that he's not...

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»New Jersey»If this was retaliation f...